FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2284200344> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2284200344 endingPage "0" @default.
• W2284200344 startingPage "0" @default.
• W2284200344 abstract "An experimental program of steel panel shear walls is outlined and some results are presented. The tested specimens utilized low yield strength (LYS) steel infill panels and reduced beam sections (RBS) at the beam-ends. Two specimens make allowances for penetration of the panel by utilities, which would exist in a retrofit situation. The first, consisting of multiple holes, or perforations, in the steel panel, also has the characteristic of further reducing the corresponding solid panel strength (as compared with the use of traditional steel). The second such specimen utilizes quarter-circle cutouts in the panel corners, which are reinforced to transfer the panel forces to the adjacent framing. INTRODUCTION The selection of Steel Plate Shear Walls (SPSWs) as the primary lateral force resisting system in buildings has increased in recent years as design engineers discover the benefits of this option. Its use has matured since initial designs, which did not allow for utilization of the post-buckling strength, but only elastic and shear yield plate behavior. This design approach typically resulted in the selection of a relatively thick panel for the infill. A large plate thickness, while producing a stiff structure that would reduce displacement demand during a seismic event, would also induce relatively large forces on the surrounding frame members, which must be detailed accordingly to ensure adequate performance. Research conducted by Thorburn et al. (1983) supported the SPSW design philosophy that reduced plate thickness by allowing the occurrence of shear buckling. After buckling, lateral load is carried in the panel via the subsequently developed diagonal tension field action. Smaller panel thicknesses also reduce forces on adjacent members, resulting in more efficient framing designs. Research programs at various universities have furthered the understanding of thin plate SPSWs (e.g., Lubell et al., 2000; Driver et al., 1997; Caccese et al., 1993). However, some obstacles still exist that may impede further widespread acceptance of this system. For example, using the yield stress for typically available steel material, the panel thickness as required by a given design situation may often be much thinner than plate typically available from steel mills. In a case such as this, using the minimum available plate thickness would result in a large difference in panel forces from that required by calculations. Attempts at alleviating this problem were recently addressed by the use of light-gauge, cold-formed steel panels, in a new application by Berman and Bruneau (2003). Xue and Lu (1994) suggested additional means of reducing demand on framing adjacent to an SPSW, including the connection of the infill panel to only the beams in a 1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Email: vian@eng.buffalo.edu 2 Professor, Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Email: bruneau@mceermail.buffalo.edu moment frame. However, more work is required to ensure the viability of the SPSW system in a wide range of situations. The University at Buffalo (UB) and the Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER) initiated a co-operative experimental program with National Taiwan University (NTU) and the National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in order to further address the above issues with regards to SPSW performance. A description of the test program and presentation of results follows below. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM A total of three single bay, single story LYS SPSW specimens were designed by the researchers at UB, fabricated in Taiwan, and subjected to quasi-static cyclic testing in the NCREE laboratory at NTU. The frames measured 4000mm wide and 2000mm high between member centerlines, and consisted of 345MPa steel members. The infill panels produced by China Steel were 2.6mm thick, LYS steel plates with an initial yield stress of 165MPa, and ultimate strength of 300MPa, important properties that may aid in alleviating over-strength concerns mentioned above. All specimens also have a beam-to-column connection detail that includes reduced beam sections (RBS) at each end. This detail was designed to ensure all inelastic beam action would occur at these locations, with the intention of efficient anchoring of infill panel tension field forces, as required at the extremes (roof and basement level beams) of a multistory SPSW-retrofitted/designed steel frame. A solid panel specimen is shown schematically in Fig. 1. Figure 1. Typical specimen dimensions. Two specimens tested had solid panels while the remaining two provide utility access through the panels using cutouts. One specimen consisted of a panel with a total of twenty 200mm-diameter holes, or perforations, in an arrangement shown in Fig. 2. Roberts and Sabouri-Ghomi (1992) conducted research investigating the effects of a single perforation in an unstiffened shear panel, leading to some reduction factors that could be applied to the properties of a solid panel, conservatively reducing the stiffness and strength to account for the presence of the perforation. The multiple perforations present in the tested specimen share the common goal of utility access in order to make the SPSW system more acceptable, while also serving as a method of reducing the panel strength and therefore the demand on the surrounding framing. This latter characteristic may prove beneficial in markets that do not have LYS readily available for structural applications. Figure 2. Specimen P before testing. The other specimen allowing for utility penetration is a solid panel, with the top corners of the panel cutout and reinforced to transmit panel forces to the surrounding framing, as shown in Fig. 3 below. This specimen would allow utility access through the wall, while also transmitting forces near that of the solid panel counterpart. Figure 3. Specimen CR before testing. All specimens were tested using a cyclic, quasi-static loading protocol similar to ATC-24. In agreement with the typical testing procedure at NCREE, a displacement-controlled scheme was selected for the entire experimental program. Based on estimates of yield from SAP2000 pushover analyses, the displacement history shown in Fig. 4, was developed and applied horizontally to the center of the top beam using four actuators, as shown in the figures above. The same displacement loading history was used for actuator control of all the specimens tested. -160 -120 -80 -40 0 40 80 120 160 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 Number of Cycles, N In te rs to ry D is pl ac em en t ( m m ) -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% In te rs to ry D rif t ( % ) 2 cycles per amplitude 3 cycles per amplitude" @default.
• W2284200344 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2284200344 creator A5015903447 @default.
• W2284200344 creator A5047771731 @default.
• W2284200344 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W2284200344 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2284200344 title "TESTING OF SPECIAL LYS STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS" @default.
• W2284200344 cites W2051218311 @default.
• W2284200344 cites W2078586139 @default.
• W2284200344 cites W2112365496 @default.
• W2284200344 cites W2767153121 @default.
• W2284200344 cites W758295960 @default.
• W2284200344 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2284200344 type Work @default.
• W2284200344 sameAs 2284200344 @default.
• W2284200344 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2284200344 countsByYear W22842003442012 @default.
• W2284200344 countsByYear W22842003442013 @default.
• W2284200344 countsByYear W22842003442015 @default.
• W2284200344 countsByYear W22842003442016 @default.
• W2284200344 countsByYear W22842003442017 @default.
• W2284200344 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2284200344 hasAuthorship W2284200344A5015903447 @default.
• W2284200344 hasAuthorship W2284200344A5047771731 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C139700937 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C170901245 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConcept C96035792 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C127313418 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C127413603 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C139700937 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C159985019 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C170901245 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C192562407 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C66938386 @default.
• W2284200344 hasConceptScore W2284200344C96035792 @default.
• W2284200344 hasLocation W22842003441 @default.
• W2284200344 hasOpenAccess W2284200344 @default.
• W2284200344 hasPrimaryLocation W22842003441 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W1974185552 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W1992958314 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2009378567 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2014163273 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2042089727 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2058905222 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2063833734 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2064823112 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2078586139 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2104355441 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2112365496 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2115821600 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2124298865 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2127176101 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2147853186 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2185579058 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2767153121 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W758295960 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W837955341 @default.
• W2284200344 hasRelatedWork W2279660968 @default.
• W2284200344 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2284200344 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2284200344 magId "2284200344" @default.
• W2284200344 workType "article" @default.