Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2286157070> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W2286157070 endingPage "16" @default.
- W2286157070 startingPage "16" @default.
- W2286157070 abstract "As a physician-investigator, I have participated as an ad hoc reviewer for a number of years in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Oncology Study Section, one of many chartered Initial Review Groups that reviews applications to fund cancer clinical trials and studies of biological materials derived from cooperative group clinical trials. This group is unique because of its charge and the members who comprise its body of reviewers. Every proposal is reviewed by at least three clinical investigators (usually physicians) with backgrounds in radiation oncology, medical or pediatric oncology, pathology, and a variety of other biomedical science disciplines. Additionally, a biostatician reviews each proposal to determine the validity of the method of design and of the data analysis plan. Even when a study is sufficiently important to conduct and its hypothesis is sound, one might expect that a review committee would disapprove a study that is poorly designed and that will not produce statistically significant results. All too often, however, protocols that are creative and important but flawed methodologically receive a positive review for a variety of reasons: the study is a great idea, it's a truly innovative approach, or the disease under study is terrible and without any effective treatment, so anything in this area would help. Yet is it ethical to conduct methodologically flawed clinical trials? More specifically, can we justify conducting studies with few participants, known as underpowered clinical trials, if these trials are unlikely to produce statistically significant results?" @default.
- W2286157070 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2286157070 creator A5037263452 @default.
- W2286157070 date "2004-05-01" @default.
- W2286157070 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2286157070 title "Can Underpowered Clinical Trials Be Justified?" @default.
- W2286157070 cites W1562387252 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W1942361359 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W1973560717 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W1974642960 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W1998496751 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2017874571 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2018956363 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2031825421 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2050647720 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2051710274 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2052421758 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2065646678 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2067927349 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2069025263 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2078857092 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2081550122 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2106708607 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2108669956 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2133152089 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2138161474 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2168802445 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2185945096 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2400501555 @default.
- W2286157070 cites W2491700527 @default.
- W2286157070 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3563753" @default.
- W2286157070 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15281196" @default.
- W2286157070 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2286157070 type Work @default.
- W2286157070 sameAs 2286157070 @default.
- W2286157070 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W2286157070 countsByYear W22861570702014 @default.
- W2286157070 countsByYear W22861570702015 @default.
- W2286157070 countsByYear W22861570702017 @default.
- W2286157070 countsByYear W22861570702018 @default.
- W2286157070 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2286157070 hasAuthorship W2286157070A5037263452 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConceptScore W2286157070C126322002 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConceptScore W2286157070C15744967 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConceptScore W2286157070C535046627 @default.
- W2286157070 hasConceptScore W2286157070C71924100 @default.
- W2286157070 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2286157070 hasLocation W22861570701 @default.
- W2286157070 hasLocation W22861570702 @default.
- W2286157070 hasOpenAccess W2286157070 @default.
- W2286157070 hasPrimaryLocation W22861570701 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
- W2286157070 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
- W2286157070 hasVolume "26" @default.
- W2286157070 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2286157070 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2286157070 magId "2286157070" @default.
- W2286157070 workType "article" @default.