FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2287642010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2287642010 endingPage "74" @default.
• W2287642010 startingPage "69" @default.
• W2287642010 abstract "Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in dermatology provide high-level evidence for clinicians and policy makers that influence clinical decision making and treatment guidelines. One methodological problem with systematic reviews is the under representation of unpublished studies. This problem is due in part to publication bias. Omission of statistically non-significant data from meta-analyses may result in overestimation of treatment effect sizes which may lead to clinical consequences. Our goal was to assess whether systematic reviewers in dermatology evaluate and report publication bias. Further, we wanted to conduct our own evaluation of publication bias on meta-analyses that failed to do so. Our study considered systematic reviews and meta-analyses from ten dermatology journals from 2006 to 2016. A PubMed search was conducted, and all full-text articles that met our inclusion criteria were retrieved and coded by the primary author. 293 articles were included in our analysis. Additionally, we formally evaluated publication bias in meta-analyses that failed to do so using trim and fill and cumulative meta-analysis by precision methods. Publication bias was mentioned in 107 articles (36.5%) and was formally evaluated in 64 articles (21.8%). Visual inspection of a funnel plot was the most common method of evaluating publication bias. Publication bias was present in 45 articles (15.3%), not present in 57 articles (19.5%) and not determined in 191 articles (65.2%). Using the trim and fill method, 7 meta-analyses (33.33%) showed evidence of publication bias. Although the trim and fill method only found evidence of publication bias in 7 meta-analyses, the cumulative meta-analysis by precision method found evidence of publication bias in 15 meta-analyses (71.4%). Many of the reviews in our study did not mention or evaluate publication bias. Further, of the 42 articles that stated following PRISMA reporting guidelines, 19 (45.2%) evaluated for publication bias. In comparison to other studies, we found that systematic reviews in dermatology were less likely to evaluate for publication bias. Evaluating and reporting the likelihood of publication bias should be standard practice in systematic reviews when appropriate." @default.
• W2287642010 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2287642010 creator A5070232542 @default.
• W2287642010 creator A5070252386 @default.
• W2287642010 date "2016-05-01" @default.
• W2287642010 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2287642010 title "Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses" @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1521074138 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1622531671 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1922692046 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1970374211 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1972936145 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1979423827 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1979501715 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1983686777 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1986803564 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1991727170 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W1992074138 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2005501262 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2008635283 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2024565900 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2033585778 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2052963462 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2057620391 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2079011310 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2092160073 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2098274145 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2112339576 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2113235638 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2115806808 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2121849463 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2129838362 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2137349687 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2145626843 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2149179336 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2153121082 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2164093802 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2164569333 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2167290760 @default.
• W2287642010 cites W2185309897 @default.
• W2287642010 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.02.005" @default.
• W2287642010 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26925817" @default.
• W2287642010 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2287642010 type Work @default.
• W2287642010 sameAs 2287642010 @default.
• W2287642010 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102016 @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102017 @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102018 @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102019 @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102020 @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102021 @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102022 @default.
• W2287642010 countsByYear W22876420102023 @default.
• W2287642010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2287642010 hasAuthorship W2287642010A5070232542 @default.
• W2287642010 hasAuthorship W2287642010A5070252386 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C136206449 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C82605166 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C136206449 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C142724271 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C15744967 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C17744445 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C189708586 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C19648533 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C199539241 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C204787440 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C2779473830 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C2780439572 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C71924100 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C82605166 @default.
• W2287642010 hasConceptScore W2287642010C95190672 @default.
• W2287642010 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2287642010 hasLocation W22876420101 @default.
• W2287642010 hasLocation W22876420102 @default.
• W2287642010 hasOpenAccess W2287642010 @default.
• W2287642010 hasPrimaryLocation W22876420101 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W2101326548 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W2168764238 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W2288287031 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W2791602881 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W3020484663 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W3030530398 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W3198189088 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W4251984183 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W4280594415 @default.
• W2287642010 hasRelatedWork W4288184803 @default.

• next