FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2288157239> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2288157239 endingPage "893" @default.
• W2288157239 startingPage "877" @default.
• W2288157239 abstract "BackgroundAmerican College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) clinical practice guidelines on the evaluation of pulmonary nodules may have low adoption among clinicians in Asian countries. Unique patient characteristics of Asian patients affect the diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary nodules. The objective of these clinical practice guidelines was to adapt those of CHEST to provide consensus-based recommendations relevant to practitioners in Asia.MethodsA modified ADAPTE process was used by a multidisciplinary group of pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons in Asia. An initial panel meeting analyzed all CHEST recommendations to achieve consensus on recommendations and identify areas that required further investigation before consensus could be achieved. Revised recommendations were circulated to panel members for iterative review and redrafting to develop the final guidelines.ResultsEvaluation of pulmonary nodules in Asia broadly follows those of the CHEST guidelines with important caveats. Practitioners should be aware of the risk of lung cancer caused by high levels of indoor and outdoor air pollution, as well as the high incidence of adenocarcinoma in female nonsmokers. Furthermore, the high prevalence of granulomatous disease and other infectious causes of pulmonary nodules need to be considered. Therefore, diagnostic risk calculators developed in non-Asian patients may not be applicable. Overall, longer surveillance of nodules than those recommended by CHEST should be considered.ConclusionsTB in Asia favors lesser reliance on PET scanning and greater use of nonsurgical biopsy over surgical diagnosis or surveillance. Practitioners in Asia are encouraged to use these adapted consensus guidelines to facilitate consistent evaluation of pulmonary nodules. American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) clinical practice guidelines on the evaluation of pulmonary nodules may have low adoption among clinicians in Asian countries. Unique patient characteristics of Asian patients affect the diagnostic evaluation of pulmonary nodules. The objective of these clinical practice guidelines was to adapt those of CHEST to provide consensus-based recommendations relevant to practitioners in Asia. A modified ADAPTE process was used by a multidisciplinary group of pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons in Asia. An initial panel meeting analyzed all CHEST recommendations to achieve consensus on recommendations and identify areas that required further investigation before consensus could be achieved. Revised recommendations were circulated to panel members for iterative review and redrafting to develop the final guidelines. Evaluation of pulmonary nodules in Asia broadly follows those of the CHEST guidelines with important caveats. Practitioners should be aware of the risk of lung cancer caused by high levels of indoor and outdoor air pollution, as well as the high incidence of adenocarcinoma in female nonsmokers. Furthermore, the high prevalence of granulomatous disease and other infectious causes of pulmonary nodules need to be considered. Therefore, diagnostic risk calculators developed in non-Asian patients may not be applicable. Overall, longer surveillance of nodules than those recommended by CHEST should be considered. TB in Asia favors lesser reliance on PET scanning and greater use of nonsurgical biopsy over surgical diagnosis or surveillance. Practitioners in Asia are encouraged to use these adapted consensus guidelines to facilitate consistent evaluation of pulmonary nodules." @default.
• W2288157239 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5028525443 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5029278719 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5030417585 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5034097034 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5041035234 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5049564307 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5065438503 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5074439380 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5075862015 @default.
• W2288157239 creator A5088357606 @default.
• W2288157239 date "2016-10-01" @default.
• W2288157239 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2288157239 title "Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules" @default.
• W2288157239 cites W1789605498 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W1975127186 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W1980353330 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W1985010463 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2015084400 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2017103032 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2020089990 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2021902526 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2028962885 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2030607993 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2049013464 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2049330354 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2056527544 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2058735415 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2067831513 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2075304239 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2081709636 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2083754176 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2084645564 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2089278989 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2102986816 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2107456698 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2112971584 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2113245435 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2119805230 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2126945850 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2127357802 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2130073421 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2141817705 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2142085990 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2150536965 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2152501249 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2158794355 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2167814438 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2313039124 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2325861048 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W2626788793 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W3123596654 @default.
• W2288157239 cites W4376848671 @default.
• W2288157239 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.650" @default.
• W2288157239 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26923625" @default.
• W2288157239 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2288157239 type Work @default.
• W2288157239 sameAs 2288157239 @default.
• W2288157239 citedByCount "127" @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392016 @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392017 @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392018 @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392019 @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392020 @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392021 @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392022 @default.
• W2288157239 countsByYear W22881572392023 @default.
• W2288157239 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5028525443 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5029278719 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5030417585 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5034097034 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5041035234 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5049564307 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5065438503 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5074439380 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5075862015 @default.
• W2288157239 hasAuthorship W2288157239A5088357606 @default.
• W2288157239 hasBestOaLocation W22881572391 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C2779974597 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C2908861384 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C126838900 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C142724271 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C177713679 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C2776256026 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C2779974597 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C2908861384 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C512399662 @default.
• W2288157239 hasConceptScore W2288157239C71924100 @default.
• W2288157239 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2288157239 hasLocation W22881572391 @default.

• next