FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2288576504> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2288576504 abstract "To date, much of the business groups(BGs) literature has focused on mature and/or economically more important types of groups in their respective markets such as the chaebol (jae-bul) in South Korea, the quanxi qiye in Taiwan, the konglomerat in Indonesia, the family business groups in India, the family holdings in Turkey, the grupos economicos in Latin America, the twenty-two families of Pakistan, financial-industrial groups or FIGs (semibankirschchina) in Russia, and the qiye jituan in China. Yet, more recent analyses of BGs recognize distinct types of BGs which emerge in the same markets but differ in terms of their performances and a variety of organizational characteristics such as age, size, scope, ownership status, financial resources, and relations with the state business groups. Alliances composed of small and medium sized firms, which are often loosely connected through joint production, joint marketing, and knowledge sharing networks, are identified as regional networks in Turkey (Karademir, 2004; Yaprak, Karademir and Osborn, 2007). Member firms of these networks seek benefits such as gaining access to more advance technological and marketing knowledge. In most cases, member firms of these networks establish relatively stronger social and economic ties to policy makers at the local and national levels compared to their stand alone counterparts. Some of them appear to be networks of second-tier and third-tier suppliers. Some others evolve into hybrid structures which would be known as multiownership holding company structure in Turkey. For the purposes of this study, we review the literature on regional networks and examine institutional factors affecting their evolutionary dynamics. BGs are often conceptualized as groups of firms which are legally independent but connected through economic, social, and legal ties. Yet, it should be considered that BGs may vary according to some organizational characteristics such as such as age, size, scope, status of ownership, axes of solidarity, administrative structure, and network characteristics. A review of current literature illustrates that these complex entities which emerge in different institutional and economic settings considerably vary from each other (Yaprak, Karademir and Osborn, 2007). While we are relatively more informed about the varying characteristics of BGs in different emerging markets, we are not informed as well about whether different types of BGs exist in these markets, and on what basis and to what extent do they differ from each other. More recent analyses of BGs recognize distinct types of BGs which emerge in the same markets but differ in terms of their performances and a variety of organizational characteristics. For example, Karademir (2004) identifies four types of BGs in Turkey; (a) Dominant Business Groups-DBGs, (b) Emergent Business Groups EBGs, (c) Encouraged Networks-ENs, and (d) Regional Networks-RNs. The first two of these are family owned and controlled BGs which emerged in different institutional and economic periods of Turkey. With a few exceptions initial investments of DBGs date back to 1950s. These BGs evolved along with the “roller coaster” economy and political climate of the country. Today, they dominate key industrial sectors, are likely alliance partners for multinationals, and favorable participants of the big privatization projects. EBGs, on the other hand, are" @default.
• W2288576504 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2288576504 creator A5023497055 @default.
• W2288576504 creator A5067687073 @default.
• W2288576504 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2288576504 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2288576504 title "Neden Bazi İşletme Gruplari Diğerlerinin Gerisinde Kalmaktadir? Türkiye'deki Bölgesel Şebeke Örgütleri Örneği Why Some Types of Business Groups Fall Behind Others? The Case of Regional Networks in Turkey" @default.
• W2288576504 cites W1518929531 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W1520734368 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W1555315399 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W1977282070 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W1994059462 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W1999177967 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2008608333 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2040469599 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2042842606 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2062875326 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2100105048 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2138195915 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2170410583 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W2416841715 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W3124836373 @default.
• W2288576504 cites W601903121 @default.
• W2288576504 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2288576504 type Work @default.
• W2288576504 sameAs 2288576504 @default.
• W2288576504 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2288576504 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2288576504 hasAuthorship W2288576504A5023497055 @default.
• W2288576504 hasAuthorship W2288576504A5067687073 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C136264566 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C26271046 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C2780568316 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConcept C90287048 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C10138342 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C136264566 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C144133560 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C162324750 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C166957645 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C191935318 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C205649164 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C26271046 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C2780568316 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C39389867 @default.
• W2288576504 hasConceptScore W2288576504C90287048 @default.
• W2288576504 hasLocation W22885765041 @default.
• W2288576504 hasOpenAccess W2288576504 @default.
• W2288576504 hasPrimaryLocation W22885765041 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W1526650167 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W1553073421 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W1786739537 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W1997562673 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2065785947 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2074220159 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2115414594 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2281034869 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2292741944 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2401233193 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2421115553 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2980306644 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W3023010573 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W3121517203 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W3123530146 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W3125157208 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W3126341909 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W321355370 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W2514377536 @default.
• W2288576504 hasRelatedWork W3014898947 @default.
• W2288576504 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2288576504 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2288576504 magId "2288576504" @default.
• W2288576504 workType "article" @default.