FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2289269286> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2289269286 endingPage "57" @default.
• W2289269286 startingPage "47" @default.
• W2289269286 abstract "The aim of this study was to understand the benefit of diet mixing for Creole goats grazing native forage species in the central Monte desert of Argentina and the drivers of preference in the mixed diet. To achieve this goal, cafeteria-style experiments were conducted with thirty female Creole goats (2 years old; 44 ± 1.4 kg) and forage species that are typically ingested by goats in this region: Two tanniniferous (Tricomaria usillo, Mimosa ephedroides) and three non-tanniniferous shrubs (Prosopis flexuosa, Capparis atamisquea, Atriplex lampa). In Experiment 1, goats were assigned to three groups (n = 10); two groups were offered single tannin-containing shrubs as their basal diet (T. usillo; SDTU or M. ephedroides, SDME), whereas the third group received a combination of all five forages (Mixed diet of forages, MD). After a fifteen-day adaptation period, half the animals in each group (n = 5) were dosed with polyethylene glycol (PEG), a polymer that neutralizes the negative effects of tannins, whereas the other half (Control) were not dosed (CG). Daily dry matter intake (DMI), in vivo apparent digestibility of the diet (ADD) and nitrogen (ADN) were determined. For goats fed MD, preference was estimated based on the DMI of each of the forages offered. Jugular blood samples were collected on the first and last days of the experiment to determine concentrations of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum metabolites indicative of liver damage. In experiment 2, intake rates (IR) of the five forage species were estimated. No significant differences in DMI were detected among treatments. However, goats offered a choice of forages (MD) in the CG treatment had greater diet digestibility and lower BUN than animals fed the single shrubs, showing evidence of a nutritional benefit with dietary diversity. Goats changed their foraging preferences in response to PEG supplementation. Animals in the CG treatment preferred M. ephedroides whereas animals in the PEGG treatment preferred A. lampa. There was a positive correlation between forage preference and IR of crude protein (r = 0.65; P < 0.001) in PEGG goats, and between forage preference and IR of total tannins (r = 0.77, P < 0.001) in CG goats. When PEG attenuated biological effects of condensed tannins, goats switched their preference from forages that offered the greatest IR of total tannins (i.e., M. ephedroides) to those that led to the greatest IR of crude protein (i.e., A. lampa). In summary, a mixed diet led to greater nutritional benefits than single diets, which contribute to explain the diverse array of food items goats typically show when browsing in the central Monte desert of Argentina. Our results also show that CP, tannins and plant structure (which offer variable intake rates) play significant roles in goats’ foraging preferences in this environment." @default.
• W2289269286 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2289269286 creator A5007871577 @default.
• W2289269286 creator A5039523543 @default.
• W2289269286 creator A5041980074 @default.
• W2289269286 creator A5046041814 @default.
• W2289269286 creator A5078254324 @default.
• W2289269286 creator A5083331292 @default.
• W2289269286 creator A5085220557 @default.
• W2289269286 date "2016-05-01" @default.
• W2289269286 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2289269286 title "Diet mixing and condensed tannins help explain foraging preferences by Creole goats facing the physical and chemical diversity of native woody plants in the central Monte desert (Argentina)" @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1513215086 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1565999409 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1602808306 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1867955960 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1906104920 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1964332487 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1965800097 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1966478679 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1970103212 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1976691596 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1977270203 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1984259554 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1991363715 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W1999081076 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2000922268 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2006223968 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2009331601 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2012228530 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2015788681 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2021140521 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2027426244 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2028771046 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2030763168 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2034665308 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2035360261 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2037375396 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2038224696 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2042735979 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2045202091 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2046855662 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2047145008 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2047925258 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2050125624 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2050344033 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2054910903 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2066564600 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2067682372 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2075988694 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2076707978 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2091777803 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2093934318 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2094770584 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2100861254 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2103203469 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2104114696 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2108717703 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2114775886 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2123758838 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2127543094 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2127871677 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2129319925 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2136231083 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2149132995 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2158927317 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2164876114 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2165194456 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2171716446 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2332499916 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2399909408 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2437513015 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W2479325095 @default.
• W2289269286 cites W4253093943 @default.
• W2289269286 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.02.021" @default.
• W2289269286 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2289269286 type Work @default.
• W2289269286 sameAs 2289269286 @default.
• W2289269286 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2289269286 countsByYear W22892692862016 @default.
• W2289269286 countsByYear W22892692862018 @default.
• W2289269286 countsByYear W22892692862020 @default.
• W2289269286 countsByYear W22892692862021 @default.
• W2289269286 countsByYear W22892692862022 @default.
• W2289269286 countsByYear W22892692862023 @default.
• W2289269286 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2289269286 hasAuthorship W2289269286A5007871577 @default.
• W2289269286 hasAuthorship W2289269286A5039523543 @default.
• W2289269286 hasAuthorship W2289269286A5041980074 @default.
• W2289269286 hasAuthorship W2289269286A5046041814 @default.
• W2289269286 hasAuthorship W2289269286A5078254324 @default.
• W2289269286 hasAuthorship W2289269286A5083331292 @default.
• W2289269286 hasAuthorship W2289269286A5085220557 @default.
• W2289269286 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2289269286 hasConcept C2777904157 @default.
• W2289269286 hasConcept C2778004101 @default.
• W2289269286 hasConcept C2778091200 @default.
• W2289269286 hasConcept C2779039770 @default.

• next