Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2290820404> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- W2290820404 abstract "Comparative costs of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery Background: In Chile, laparoscopic surgery is not universally used for colorectal diseases due to its learning curve and high costs. However this last drawback may not be true if all hospitalization costs are considered. Aim: To compare the costs of open and laparoscopic colonic excision surgery. Material and Methods: Data for all elective colectomies performed during 2005 and 2006 were retrieved from hospital records. Procedures were classified as open or laparoscopic and the total costs associated to the hospital stay of each group of procedures was obtained from the accounting office of the hospital. Results: Twenty nine patients aged 31 to 88 years (16 males), were subjected to laparoscopic surgery and 39, aged 38 to 87 years (20 females), to open surgery. Seventy six percent of patients in the group of laparoscopic surgery were subjected to a left hemicolectomy and 54% of those in the group of open surgery, to a right hemicolectomy. Operative times were 188 ± 14 and 174 ± 44 min for open and laparoscopic surgery, respectively (NS). The item with higher costs for both groups was consumables, followed by hospitalization days. No differences in the total hospitalization costs were observed between the two groups of patients. Conclusions: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery does not have a higher economical cost than traditional open surgery." @default.
- W2290820404 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2290820404 creator A5002692039 @default.
- W2290820404 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W2290820404 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2290820404 title "Costo comparativo entre abordaje abierto y laparoscópico en cirugía resectiva de colon" @default.
- W2290820404 cites W1986395580 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W1999831073 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2065138958 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2069050162 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2090900179 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2097273540 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2110365616 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2138898868 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2166854483 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2411407197 @default.
- W2290820404 cites W2415826837 @default.
- W2290820404 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2290820404 type Work @default.
- W2290820404 sameAs 2290820404 @default.
- W2290820404 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2290820404 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2290820404 hasAuthorship W2290820404A5002692039 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C3018900477 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C141071460 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C2776111594 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C2780047204 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C2780120127 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C3018900477 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C523026621 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C61434518 @default.
- W2290820404 hasConceptScore W2290820404C71924100 @default.
- W2290820404 hasLocation W22908204041 @default.
- W2290820404 hasOpenAccess W2290820404 @default.
- W2290820404 hasPrimaryLocation W22908204041 @default.
- W2290820404 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2290820404 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2290820404 magId "2290820404" @default.
- W2290820404 workType "article" @default.