FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W229147135> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W229147135 startingPage "493" @default.
• W229147135 abstract "Tobacco Litigation: Manufacturers Required to Disclose Ingredients Under State Disclosure Law-Philip Morris, Inc. v. Reilly1-The U.S. Court of Appeals for First Circuit held that Massachusetts Tobacco Ingredients and Nicotine Yield Act (Disclosure Act)2 did not effect a taking of trade secrets or violate Dormant Commerce Clause.3 Massachusetts legislature passed Disclosure Act in 1996 with the purpose of protecting public health.4 Disclosure Act requires manufacturers of tobacco products to submit an annual report to Department of Public Health (DPH). For every brand of products sold within Massachusetts, report must include a list of identity and quantity of all ingredients, along with standardized nicotine intake ratings.5 Under Disclosure Act, DPH shall make ingredients public record if disclosure of information could reduce risks to public health and if Massachusetts Attorney General determines that release of information will not constitute a taking of trade secrets. DPH is required to give manufacturer sixty days' written notice before releasing information to public. manufacturer may then cease sales in Massachusetts or remove product from Massachusetts market in order to reformulate it without constitutent(s) identified as problematic by DPH.6 plaintiffs, manufacturers of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, argued that because ingredients and quantities were trade secrets, Disclosure Act constituted an uncompensated taking and violated Commerce Clause. plaintiffs brought suit against Massachusetts Attorney General after bill passed in 1996. district court granted a permanent injunction in September 2000. Commonwealth appealed, arguing that case was not ripe for review and that Disclosure Act did not constitute a taking or violate Commerce Clause. Applying a two-part test to assess ripeness, court determined that facts were sufficiently developed for review and that plaintiffs would suffer undue hardship if decision were delayed.7 district court held that a taking was effected because Disclosure Act would deprive plaintiffs of their property interest in their trade secrets, thereby requiring just compensation by government.8 First Circuit disagreed, finding that manufacturers must bear burden of government regulation in order to enjoy benefit of marketing tobacco products in Massachusetts.9 court stated that The right of a manufacturer to maintain secrecy as to his compounds and processes must be held subject to right of state ... to require that nature of product be fairly set forth.10 As there are no explicit guarantees of confidentiality, Disclosure Act does not constitute a taking. …" @default.
• W229147135 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W229147135 creator A5016723189 @default.
• W229147135 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W229147135 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W229147135 title "Tobacco Litigation: Manufacturers Required to Disclose Ingredients under State Disclosure Law-Philip Morris, Inc. V. Reilly" @default.
• W229147135 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W229147135 type Work @default.
• W229147135 sameAs 229147135 @default.
• W229147135 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W229147135 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W229147135 hasAuthorship W229147135A5016723189 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C2776305056 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C2777134139 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C2779913896 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C2781145028 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W229147135 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C127413603 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C144133560 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C17744445 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C199539241 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C2776305056 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C2777134139 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C2779913896 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C2781145028 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C78519656 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C83009810 @default.
• W229147135 hasConceptScore W229147135C97460637 @default.
• W229147135 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W229147135 hasLocation W2291471351 @default.
• W229147135 hasOpenAccess W229147135 @default.
• W229147135 hasPrimaryLocation W2291471351 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W10776614 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W137586339 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W140140066 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W1482586495 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W1582683681 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W180015790 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W225236535 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W226509852 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W254770490 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W273164909 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W282867686 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W294867726 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W3124142713 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W3157951340 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W317387153 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W3205772011 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W324850452 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W75066834 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W2136890069 @default.
• W229147135 hasRelatedWork W217403387 @default.
• W229147135 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W229147135 isParatext "false" @default.
• W229147135 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W229147135 magId "229147135" @default.
• W229147135 workType "article" @default.