FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2291712494> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2291712494 endingPage "309" @default.
• W2291712494 startingPage "309" @default.
• W2291712494 abstract "Objective An advantage of surgical treatment over conservative treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is controversial. Recent reports suggest that contrast extravasations on CT angiography (CTA) might serve as a crucial predictor of hematoma expansion and mortality. The purpose of this study was aimed at investigating the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with spot sign positive ICH. Methods We used our institutional medical data search system to identify all adult patients who admitted for treatment of ICH between January 1, 2007 and January 31, 2012. Patients were classified two groups into a surgical group (n=27) and a conservative treatment group (n=28). Admission criteria were the following: age 20-79 years, spontaneous supratentorial ICH, Glasgow Coma Score Ranging from 9 to 14, ICH volume ≥20 mL, and treatment within 24 hours. Results Fifty-five patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the ICU stay between the conservative treatment group (7.36±3.66 days) and the surgical treatment group (6.93±2.20 days; p=0.950). There was a significant difference in the in-hospital stay between the conservative treatment group (13.93±8.87 days) and the surgical treatment group (20.33±6.37 days; p=0.001). Overall mortality at day 90 after ICH was 36.4%; this included 16 of 28 patients (57.1%) in the conservative group and 4 of 27 patients (14.8%) in the surgical group. In univariate analysis, there was a positive effect of the surgical treatment in reducing mortality at 90 days (p=0.002), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 90-day (p=0.006), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90-day (p=0.023). In multivariate logistic analysis, there was a significant difference in mortality (odds ratio, 0.211; 95% confidence interval, 0.049-0.906; p=0.036) between the groups at 90-day follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in GOS (odds ratio, 0.371; 95% confidence interval, 0.031-4.446; p=0.434) and mRS (odds ratio, 1.041; 95% confidence interval, 0.086-12.637; p=0.975) between the groups at 90-day follow-up. Conclusion In this study of surgical treatment of supratentorial ICH in patients with spot sign positive in CTA was associated with less mortality despite of long duration of in-hospital stay. We failed to show that clinical outcome benefit of surgical treatment compared with conservative treatment in patients with spot sign positive ICH. Key Words: Intracerebral hemorrhage · Spot sign · Surgery · Conservative treatment." @default.
• W2291712494 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2291712494 creator A5047315694 @default.
• W2291712494 creator A5062747715 @default.
• W2291712494 creator A5074809438 @default.
• W2291712494 creator A5076223935 @default.
• W2291712494 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2291712494 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2291712494 title "Surgery versus Conservative Treatment for Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Spot Sign Positive Patients" @default.
• W2291712494 cites W1981194197 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W1983429041 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W1989226643 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2003059320 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2039415880 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2043146840 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2052524744 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2053568672 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2070507194 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2072355696 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2075849746 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2086672983 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2094585602 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2106313510 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2106447397 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2107281754 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2108012929 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2115466183 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2116057538 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2121609412 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2142640478 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2147967952 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2148534328 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2151432761 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2152510270 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2155070090 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2155074770 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2162974493 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2317766098 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W2355654874 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W4210987237 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W4235543847 @default.
• W2291712494 cites W4249987133 @default.
• W2291712494 doi "https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.4.309" @default.
• W2291712494 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4651989" @default.
• W2291712494 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26587182" @default.
• W2291712494 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2291712494 type Work @default.
• W2291712494 sameAs 2291712494 @default.
• W2291712494 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2291712494 countsByYear W22917124942016 @default.
• W2291712494 countsByYear W22917124942018 @default.
• W2291712494 countsByYear W22917124942019 @default.
• W2291712494 countsByYear W22917124942020 @default.
• W2291712494 countsByYear W22917124942021 @default.
• W2291712494 countsByYear W22917124942022 @default.
• W2291712494 countsByYear W22917124942023 @default.
• W2291712494 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2291712494 hasAuthorship W2291712494A5047315694 @default.
• W2291712494 hasAuthorship W2291712494A5062747715 @default.
• W2291712494 hasAuthorship W2291712494A5074809438 @default.
• W2291712494 hasAuthorship W2291712494A5076223935 @default.
• W2291712494 hasBestOaLocation W22917124941 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C144301174 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C17624336 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C2777094939 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C2779662492 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C2993107136 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C3019396726 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C126322002 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C141071460 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C144301174 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C17624336 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C2777094939 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C2779662492 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C2993107136 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C3019396726 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C38180746 @default.
• W2291712494 hasConceptScore W2291712494C71924100 @default.
• W2291712494 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2291712494 hasLocation W22917124941 @default.
• W2291712494 hasLocation W22917124942 @default.
• W2291712494 hasLocation W22917124943 @default.
• W2291712494 hasLocation W22917124944 @default.
• W2291712494 hasOpenAccess W2291712494 @default.
• W2291712494 hasPrimaryLocation W22917124941 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W1968727802 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W2068405009 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W2185962805 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W2363036762 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W2373172825 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W2385082563 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W2887790854 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W3125802064 @default.
• W2291712494 hasRelatedWork W4285536747 @default.

• next