FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2292186687> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2292186687 abstract "Many studies have explored the relationship between paranormal belief and religiosity. Some studies have shown that paranormal belief correlates with religiosity, yet many studies have not supported this association. The first goal of the present investigation therefore was to replicate previous findings. It is also of interest to explore the relationship between paranormal belief and religiosity in Chinese society, since it has not been studied so far. Another interesting correlate with paranormal belief is general cognitive ability. General cognitive ability was found negatively correlated with belief in the paranormal. However, general cognitive ability correlates with education, which might appear to be related to cognitive complexity. The relationship between paranormal belief, religiosity and cognitive complexity was explored in this study. Therefore, this study has two purposes. First, the Chinese version of the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale (RPBS) was constructed. Second, the relationship among paranormal belief, religiosity and cognitive complexity was examined. Cognitive complexity was measured by the repertory grid including an 8X8 grid. Eight personal roles, such as self, grandparent, father, mother, sibling, classmate, friend, and boyfriend or girlfriend, and four constructs, including religious belief, religious activities, virtue vs. evil, and afterlife were preset. Each participant provided the other four constructs during the test. The task was to decide the importance of each construct with regard to the relationship between the individual and each personal role by using a 9-point Likert scale. The task sequence was generated randomly according to the computer program. The score generated by the OMNIGRID called the variability of intensity was a measurement of cognitive complexity of the participant. It was obtained as follows: (a) for each pair of constructs, the correlation (COR) and its variance (VAR = COR 2 X 100%) were calculated, and (b) the variability of intensity was the standard deviation of all the VAR values obtained from each pair of constructs. Forty university students in Taiwan completed the RPBS, the Personal Religiosity Scale and the repertory grid individually. Results indicated that the Chinese version of the RPBS had a satisfactory reliability (Cronbach alpha = .88). The construct validity was confirmed from the correlation matrix between the factors of the RPBS and PRS as well. Paranormal belief and religiosity were two different constructs despite some possible overlap, such as scales of traditional religious belief, spiritualism, believing that nature/environment can affect individuals’ well-being and fortune, and afterlife (all these factors had five significant correlations with the other scale). There was a significant negative correlation between religious faithfulness and cognitive complexity. The limitations of this study include small sample size (N = 40) and lack of back-translation procedure of the Chinese version of the RPBS." @default.
• W2292186687 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2292186687 creator A5010967625 @default.
• W2292186687 creator A5025739200 @default.
• W2292186687 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W2292186687 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2292186687 title "PARANORMAL BELIEF, RELIGIOSITY AND COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY" @default.
• W2292186687 cites W153753470 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1919586704 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1939259067 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1965667659 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1976588178 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1977658320 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1978036655 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1978864291 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1987850562 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W1992974110 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2004735129 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2012177603 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2035099724 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2038568191 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2038636320 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2058495833 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2059206143 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2059636636 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2071715323 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2073938894 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2084201175 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2084392042 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2094880398 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2096064804 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2096105556 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2149355088 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2559500675 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W3046527691 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W349976111 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W623812323 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W69132457 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W96522957 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W2021484701 @default.
• W2292186687 cites W968538346 @default.
• W2292186687 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2292186687 type Work @default.
• W2292186687 sameAs 2292186687 @default.
• W2292186687 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2292186687 countsByYear W22921866872013 @default.
• W2292186687 countsByYear W22921866872015 @default.
• W2292186687 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2292186687 hasAuthorship W2292186687A5010967625 @default.
• W2292186687 hasAuthorship W2292186687A5025739200 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C15491014 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C2779793952 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C538439097 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C546668722 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C111472728 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C138885662 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C142724271 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C15491014 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C15744967 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C169760540 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C169900460 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C204787440 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C2779793952 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C538439097 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C546668722 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C71924100 @default.
• W2292186687 hasConceptScore W2292186687C77805123 @default.
• W2292186687 hasLocation W22921866871 @default.
• W2292186687 hasOpenAccess W2292186687 @default.
• W2292186687 hasPrimaryLocation W22921866871 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W1966661820 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W1986135026 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2024641493 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2047111189 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2079274116 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2117394722 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2133068744 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2154535011 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2162082901 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W257599703 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2583003408 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2900176209 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2901534409 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2905306790 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2942819361 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W3035729033 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W3094954722 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W3188006403 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W3214631229 @default.
• W2292186687 hasRelatedWork W2982311842 @default.
• W2292186687 isParatext "false" @default.

• next