FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2293425596> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2293425596 abstract "One of the most active disputes in tax law today is the question of the proper tax consequences for a successful plaintiff, a portion of whose taxable damage award is paid to his or her attorney pursuant to a contingent fee arrangement. At issue is whether the plaintiff is taxable on the portion of the award that is payable to the attorney. One aspect of this problem was resolved prospectively by the adoption of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, but the problem continues to exist in other areas. The United States Supreme Court resolved a split in the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals with respect to the taxation of contingent attorney's fees in Commissioner v. Banks, but that decision provides no comfort for the plight of taxpayers because the government prevailed. Moreover, the attorney's fee dispute is only one small example of a much larger problem. Instead of dealing with the root cause of the problem, the focus (both in the courts and in Congress) has been on whether to provide a fix for the specific plight of the taxpayers who have raised issues in court. The courts and Congress, like the Little Dutch Boy, may be willing to plug one hole, but the broader problem is a structural fault in the dam of the tax law system - namely, the improper classification of a significant number of expenditures as itemized deductions. This Article argues that the current list of nonitemized deductions wrongly excludes a number of items, especially some that are directly connected to the production of income. This erroneous exclusion imposes an unwarranted and severe tax burden in far more circumstances than the attorney's fee problem on which Congress exclusively focused in the American Job Creation Act of 2004. The harsh consequences resulting from the misclassification of a number of items are exacerbated by the stringent limitations currently imposed on many itemized deductions; but even a repeal of those limitations, which is unlikely to occur, will not cure all of the harm that a wrongful classification causes. This author hopes that highlighting several examples of misclassification will induce Congress to implement a commission to study the entire classification system, rather than to rest on its laurels for solving one small part of the problem in the American Job Creation Act of 2004." @default.
• W2293425596 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2293425596 creator A5032641812 @default.
• W2293425596 date "2005-04-18" @default.
• W2293425596 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2293425596 title "Beyond the Little Dutch Boy: An Argument for Structural Change in Tax Deduction Classification" @default.
• W2293425596 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2293425596 type Work @default.
• W2293425596 sameAs 2293425596 @default.
• W2293425596 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2293425596 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2293425596 hasAuthorship W2293425596A5032641812 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C157263771 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C162078301 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C179576951 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C551662922 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C55674860 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C10138342 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C138885662 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C145097563 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C157263771 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C162078301 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C162324750 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C17744445 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C179576951 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C190253527 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C199539241 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C2778137410 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C2778272461 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C41895202 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C551662922 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C55674860 @default.
• W2293425596 hasConceptScore W2293425596C97460637 @default.
• W2293425596 hasOpenAccess W2293425596 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W1124898751 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W1518719824 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W1548626419 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W1573036263 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2199190441 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2261134527 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2267255153 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2270117501 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2312014370 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2339102167 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2462627977 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W255727316 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W298071798 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W3123009103 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W3123876985 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W3124515297 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W3205070435 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W38633399 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W50418982 @default.
• W2293425596 hasRelatedWork W2601231038 @default.
• W2293425596 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2293425596 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2293425596 magId "2293425596" @default.
• W2293425596 workType "article" @default.