FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2296026004> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2296026004 endingPage "e2892" @default.
• W2296026004 startingPage "e2892" @default.
• W2296026004 abstract "The quality of collateral circulation affects the severity and prognosis of stroke patients. The effect of the circle of Willis, which is the primary collateral circulation, on ischemic stroke has attracted significant attention. This study was designed to investigate the effect of different circles of Willis types on stroke severity and prognosis in patients with noncardiac stroke. A total of 376 patients with noncardiac ischemic stroke, who were treated by the specialty team of cerebrovascular diseases at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen Hospital, were successively enrolled in this study. The detailed clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded upon admission, including risk factors of vascular disease and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores. The patients were divided into groups of different circles of Willis types based on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) that was performed within 3 days of admission—type I: complete circle of Willis; type II: complete anterior half of the circle of Willis and incomplete posterior half of the circle of Willis; type III: incomplete anterior half of the circle of Willis and complete posterior half of the circle of Willis; and type IV: incomplete anterior and posterior halves of the circle of Willis. Patients were re-evaluated for NIHSS scores at discharge and after discharge. The modified Rankin score (mRS) was recorded for 90 days, and stroke recurrence and death after 90 days were also recorded until the end of the study. The 376 patients were divided into 4 groups based on the MRA—type I group: 92 patients (24.5%); type II group: 215 patients (57.2%); type III group: 12 patients (3.2%), and type IV group: 57 patients (15.2%). NIHSS scores at admission and discharge were significantly lower for the type I group compared with those for the type II and type IV groups (P < 0.05). NIHSS scores were higher in the groups with an incomplete circle of Willis compared with the group with a complete circle of Willis. A poor recovery rate was highest for the type IV group, whereas a good recovery rate was highest for the type I group. The logistic regression analysis showed that a complete circle of Willis was one of the predictors of suitable recovery (odds ratio [OR] = 0.708, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.554–0.906). Circle of Willis type was associated with stroke severity and patient prognosis, whereas an incomplete circle of Willis was associated with more severe conditions and a higher 90-day poor diagnosis rate. A complete circle of Willis was an independent predictor of good prognosis." @default.
• W2296026004 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2296026004 creator A5015379431 @default.
• W2296026004 creator A5018229682 @default.
• W2296026004 creator A5026338064 @default.
• W2296026004 creator A5033274566 @default.
• W2296026004 creator A5045414239 @default.
• W2296026004 creator A5075558036 @default.
• W2296026004 creator A5080731377 @default.
• W2296026004 date "2016-03-01" @default.
• W2296026004 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2296026004 title "Correlation Between the Integrity of the Circle of Willis and the Severity of Initial Noncardiac Cerebral Infarction and Clinical Prognosis" @default.
• W2296026004 cites W1576664914 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W1606834445 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W1971989306 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W1979388461 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W1981288959 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W1981858608 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W1984408083 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2005723160 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2007723775 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2017678942 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2019013540 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2025209227 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2037315842 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2041466165 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2047693922 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2066931799 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2080504768 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2081383358 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2092629830 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2100991061 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2134208356 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2151593258 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2164193096 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2164763924 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W2321005553 @default.
• W2296026004 cites W4242649591 @default.
• W2296026004 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000002892" @default.
• W2296026004 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4998866" @default.
• W2296026004 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26962785" @default.
• W2296026004 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2296026004 type Work @default.
• W2296026004 sameAs 2296026004 @default.
• W2296026004 citedByCount "38" @default.
• W2296026004 countsByYear W22960260042017 @default.
• W2296026004 countsByYear W22960260042018 @default.
• W2296026004 countsByYear W22960260042019 @default.
• W2296026004 countsByYear W22960260042020 @default.
• W2296026004 countsByYear W22960260042021 @default.
• W2296026004 countsByYear W22960260042022 @default.
• W2296026004 countsByYear W22960260042023 @default.
• W2296026004 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2296026004 hasAuthorship W2296026004A5015379431 @default.
• W2296026004 hasAuthorship W2296026004A5018229682 @default.
• W2296026004 hasAuthorship W2296026004A5026338064 @default.
• W2296026004 hasAuthorship W2296026004A5033274566 @default.
• W2296026004 hasAuthorship W2296026004A5045414239 @default.
• W2296026004 hasAuthorship W2296026004A5075558036 @default.
• W2296026004 hasAuthorship W2296026004A5080731377 @default.
• W2296026004 hasBestOaLocation W22960260041 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C2776599846 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C2779450755 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C2780931571 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C2780944724 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C3020199598 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C541997718 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C126322002 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C127413603 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C141071460 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C164705383 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C2776599846 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C2779450755 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C2780645631 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C2780931571 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C2780944724 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C3020199598 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C541997718 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C71924100 @default.
• W2296026004 hasConceptScore W2296026004C78519656 @default.
• W2296026004 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2296026004 hasLocation W22960260041 @default.
• W2296026004 hasLocation W22960260042 @default.
• W2296026004 hasLocation W22960260043 @default.
• W2296026004 hasOpenAccess W2296026004 @default.
• W2296026004 hasPrimaryLocation W22960260041 @default.
• W2296026004 hasRelatedWork W2019677857 @default.
• W2296026004 hasRelatedWork W2296026004 @default.
• W2296026004 hasRelatedWork W2375778358 @default.
• W2296026004 hasRelatedWork W2388061226 @default.
• W2296026004 hasRelatedWork W2392715241 @default.

• next