FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2296751489> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2296751489 endingPage "980" @default.
• W2296751489 startingPage "972" @default.
• W2296751489 abstract "Background: The recovery of muscle strength after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on the preoperative tear size has not yet been well described. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the recovery period of muscle strength by a serial assessment of isometric strength after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on the preoperative tear size. The hypothesis was that muscle strength in patients with small and medium tears would recover faster than that in those with large-to-massive tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 164 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were included. Isometric strength in forward flexion (FF), internal rotation (IR), and external rotation (ER) was evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were assessed to evaluate the quality of the rotator cuff muscle, including fatty infiltration, occupation ratio, and tangent sign. Patient satisfaction as well as visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant scores were assessed at every follow-up. Results: Muscle strength demonstrated the slowest recovery in pain relief and the restoration of shoulder function. To reach the strength of the uninjured contralateral shoulder in all 3 planes of motion, recovery took 6 months in patients with small tears and 18 months in patients with medium tears. Patients with large-to-massive tears showed continuous improvement in strength up to 18 months; however, they did not reach the strength of the contralateral shoulder at final follow-up. At final follow-up, mean strength in FF, IR, and ER was 113.0%, 118.0%, and 112.6% of the contralateral shoulder in patients with small tears, respectively; 105.0%, 112.1%, and 102.6% in patients with medium tears, respectively; and 87.6%, 89.5%, and 85.2% in patients with large-to-massive tears, respectively. Muscle strength in any direction did not significantly correlate with postoperative patient satisfaction ( P = .374, .515, and .692 for FF, IR, and ER, respectively), whereas it highly correlated with preoperative quality of the muscle. Conclusion: The recovery of muscle strength after arthroscopic repair was poorly correlated with patient satisfaction. This study recommends that regardless of pain relief and improved shoulder function, patients with larger than medium tears should be encouraged to continue with rehabilitation for the maximal restoration of muscle strength beyond 1 year postoperatively." @default.
• W2296751489 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2296751489 creator A5012517831 @default.
• W2296751489 creator A5058448759 @default.
• W2296751489 creator A5058708642 @default.
• W2296751489 creator A5082922460 @default.
• W2296751489 date "2016-02-05" @default.
• W2296751489 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2296751489 title "Recovery of Muscle Strength After Intact Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair According to Preoperative Rotator Cuff Tear Size" @default.
• W2296751489 cites W1953727567 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W1968952154 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W1975831811 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W1977180115 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W1981145722 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W1985424670 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W1993515038 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2015312712 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2019231568 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2033104850 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2042891562 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2043037985 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2052040624 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2058507600 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2078840080 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2079844832 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2083707598 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2113827841 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2128531208 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2128678190 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2137536074 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2158162206 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2158194225 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2253671877 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W2302002190 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W4229841226 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W4232781087 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W4248934149 @default.
• W2296751489 cites W4320300814 @default.
• W2296751489 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515625043" @default.
• W2296751489 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26851272" @default.
• W2296751489 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2296751489 type Work @default.
• W2296751489 sameAs 2296751489 @default.
• W2296751489 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2296751489 countsByYear W22967514892017 @default.
• W2296751489 countsByYear W22967514892018 @default.
• W2296751489 countsByYear W22967514892019 @default.
• W2296751489 countsByYear W22967514892020 @default.
• W2296751489 countsByYear W22967514892021 @default.
• W2296751489 countsByYear W22967514892022 @default.
• W2296751489 countsByYear W22967514892023 @default.
• W2296751489 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2296751489 hasAuthorship W2296751489A5012517831 @default.
• W2296751489 hasAuthorship W2296751489A5058448759 @default.
• W2296751489 hasAuthorship W2296751489A5058708642 @default.
• W2296751489 hasAuthorship W2296751489A5082922460 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C103486182 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C2775885956 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C2776030733 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C103486182 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C126838900 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C141071460 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C14184104 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C143409427 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C1862650 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C2775885956 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C2776030733 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C2776511800 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C2778275304 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C2779162959 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C2780017030 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C2781184374 @default.
• W2296751489 hasConceptScore W2296751489C71924100 @default.
• W2296751489 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2296751489 hasLocation W22967514891 @default.
• W2296751489 hasLocation W22967514892 @default.
• W2296751489 hasOpenAccess W2296751489 @default.
• W2296751489 hasPrimaryLocation W22967514891 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W1924755017 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W2008460476 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W2019231568 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W2055566411 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W2140174911 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W2317274353 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W2354469296 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W2414372671 @default.
• W2296751489 hasRelatedWork W3217198355 @default.

• next