FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2298223635> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2298223635 endingPage "2549" @default.
• W2298223635 startingPage "2538" @default.
• W2298223635 abstract "To explore patients' perspectives on surgical intervention for Dupuytren's disease (DD), focusing on patients' appraisal of results, involving previous experiences, expectations and patient characters.The participants were 21 men, mean age 66 years, scheduled for DD surgery. Qualitative interviews were conducted 2-4 weeks before surgery and 6-8 months after surgery. The model of the Patient Evaluation Process was used as theoretical framework. Data were analyzed using problem-driven content analysis.Five categories are described: previous experiences, expectations before surgery, appraisal of results, expectations of the future and patient character. Previous experiences influenced participants' expectations, and these were used along with other aspects as references for appraisal of results. Participants' appraisal of results concerned perceived changes in hand function, care process, competency and organization, and could vary in relation to patient character. The appraisal of results influenced participants' expectations of future hand function, health and care.Patients' appraisal of results involved multidimensional reasoning reflecting on hand function, interaction with staff and organizational matters. Thus, it is not enough to evaluate results after DD surgery only by health outcomes as this provides only a limited perspective. Rather, evaluation of results should also cover process and structure aspects of care. Implications for Rehabilitation To improve health care services, it is important to be aware of the role played by patient's previous experiences, expectations as well as staff and organizational aspects of care. Knowledge about patients' experience and view of the results from surgery and rehabilitation should be established by assessment of care effects on health as well as structure and process aspects of care. Evaluation of structure and process aspects of care can be done by using questions about if the patient felt listened to, received clear information and explanations, was included in decision-making, and their view of waiting time or continuity of care. Improving health care services means not only providing the best treatment method available but also developing individualized care by ensuring good interaction with the patient, providing accurate information, and working to improve the structure of the care process. Before treatment, health care providers should have a dialogue with the patient and consider previous experiences and expectations in order to ensure the patient has balanced expectations of the outcome." @default.
• W2298223635 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2298223635 creator A5036395896 @default.
• W2298223635 creator A5048716331 @default.
• W2298223635 creator A5049339598 @default.
• W2298223635 date "2016-02-15" @default.
• W2298223635 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2298223635 title "Patients’ perspective on surgical intervention for Dupuytren’s disease – experiences, expectations and appraisal of results" @default.
• W2298223635 cites W1969172495 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W1969328092 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W1969792556 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W1972674253 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W1975694001 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W1977112095 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2000021110 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2000473044 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2001550453 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2004119480 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2007439531 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2012344152 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2019832420 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2041529707 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W204804345 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2057239407 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2062806164 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2066436633 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2080435768 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2081336719 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2083986388 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2089417889 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2090305710 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2097395449 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2104477420 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2109909955 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2112802609 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2113701343 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2126694806 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2136472564 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2143540592 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2146801652 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2149860758 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2168467581 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W2168958399 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W4256578005 @default.
• W2298223635 cites W53866696 @default.
• W2298223635 doi "https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1137981" @default.
• W2298223635 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26878688" @default.
• W2298223635 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2298223635 type Work @default.
• W2298223635 sameAs 2298223635 @default.
• W2298223635 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2298223635 countsByYear W22982236352017 @default.
• W2298223635 countsByYear W22982236352018 @default.
• W2298223635 countsByYear W22982236352020 @default.
• W2298223635 countsByYear W22982236352021 @default.
• W2298223635 countsByYear W22982236352022 @default.
• W2298223635 countsByYear W22982236352023 @default.
• W2298223635 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2298223635 hasAuthorship W2298223635A5036395896 @default.
• W2298223635 hasAuthorship W2298223635A5048716331 @default.
• W2298223635 hasAuthorship W2298223635A5049339598 @default.
• W2298223635 hasBestOaLocation W22982236352 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C14036430 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C12713177 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C14036430 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C142724271 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C154945302 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C15744967 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C159110408 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C160735492 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C162324750 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C1862650 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C2778818304 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C2779134260 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C2780665704 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C41008148 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C50522688 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C71924100 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C78458016 @default.
• W2298223635 hasConceptScore W2298223635C86803240 @default.
• W2298223635 hasIssue "26" @default.
• W2298223635 hasLocation W22982236351 @default.

• next