FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2298652954> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2298652954 endingPage "171" @default.
• W2298652954 startingPage "139" @default.
• W2298652954 abstract "Shifting criminal justice practices away from sligmalization and toward rcintegration is no small challenge. The innovation of community conferences in New Zealand and Australia has two structural features that are conducive to reinlegralive shaming: (a) selection of the people who respect and care most about the offender as conference participants (conducing to rcintegration) ; and (b) confrontation with victims (conducing to shaming). Observation of some failures and successes of these conferences in reintegrating both offenders and victims is used to hypothesize 14 conditions of successful reinlegration ceremonies. The spectre of failure haunts modern criminology and penology. Deep down many feel what some say openly—that 'nothing works': that despite decades of study and debate, we are no nearer deterrence than we ever were and/or that more 'humane' forms of treatment are mere masquerades concealing a descent into Kafaesque bureaucracy where offenders suffer a slow and silent suffocation of the soul. Worse still, we fear that even when something does work, it is seen to do so only in the eyes of certain professionals, while 'outside' the system ordinary citizens are left without a role or voice in the criminal justice process. This paper takes a different view. Rejecting the pessimism that pervades discussions about crime and punishment, it offers an optimistic view of at least one area—the punishment of juvenile offenders. It argues that it is possible to develop practices that 'work'—both in the sense of reducing recidivism and reintegrating offenders into a wider web of community ties and support and, at the same time, in giving victims a 'voice' in a fashion that is both satisfying and also socially productive. Further, it links a theory (reintegrative shaming) and a practice (the reintegration ceremony) which explain how to understand and how to implement this success. While there are elements that are quite distinctive about both the theory and practice of reintegrative shaming, there is also a great deal in common with the theory and practice of 'making amends' (Wright 1982); restorative justice (Cragg 1992; Galaway and Hudson 1990; Zehr 1990); reconciliation (Dignan 1992; Marshall 1985; Umbreit 1985); peacemaking (Pepinsky and Quinney 1991); redress (de Haan 1990) and feminist abolitionism (Meima 1990). We differ from abolitionists, however, in believing that it is right to shame certain kinds of conduct as criminal in certain contexts. The rest of the paper has two sections. The second section outlines some fieldwork" @default.
• W2298652954 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2298652954 creator A5059754577 @default.
• W2298652954 creator A5090680632 @default.
• W2298652954 date "1994-01-01" @default.
• W2298652954 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2298652954 title "CONDITIONS OF SUCCESSFUL REINTEGRATION CEREMONIES: Dealing with Juvenile Offenders" @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1492279571 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1500019749 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1595566099 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W186330796 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1964134164 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1969622671 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1977818357 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1991528613 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W1991538335 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2024136902 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2038727141 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2045371085 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2052665521 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2066246233 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2069015912 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2070931422 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2081645656 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2093981945 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2094259270 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2098735287 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2108074986 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2129894931 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2132479938 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2148736113 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2153340349 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2157282578 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2312587895 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2318305200 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2318735428 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2333525222 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2336089169 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2470292832 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W2798350050 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W3128002535 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W40167145 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W578566196 @default.
• W2298652954 cites W581617344 @default.
• W2298652954 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a048400" @default.
• W2298652954 hasPublicationYear "1994" @default.
• W2298652954 type Work @default.
• W2298652954 sameAs 2298652954 @default.
• W2298652954 citedByCount "299" @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542012 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542013 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542014 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542015 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542016 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542017 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542018 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542019 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542020 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542021 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542022 @default.
• W2298652954 countsByYear W22986529542023 @default.
• W2298652954 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2298652954 hasAuthorship W2298652954A5059754577 @default.
• W2298652954 hasAuthorship W2298652954A5090680632 @default.
• W2298652954 hasBestOaLocation W22986529542 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C115961737 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C71376074 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C77595967 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C115961737 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C127413603 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C15744967 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C18903297 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C38652104 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C41008148 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C545542383 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C71376074 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C71924100 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C73484699 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C77595967 @default.
• W2298652954 hasConceptScore W2298652954C86803240 @default.
• W2298652954 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2298652954 hasLocation W22986529541 @default.
• W2298652954 hasLocation W22986529542 @default.
• W2298652954 hasOpenAccess W2298652954 @default.
• W2298652954 hasPrimaryLocation W22986529541 @default.
• W2298652954 hasRelatedWork W2187082439 @default.
• W2298652954 hasRelatedWork W2312866431 @default.
• W2298652954 hasRelatedWork W2364563168 @default.
• W2298652954 hasRelatedWork W2386937469 @default.

• next