Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2307785925> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W2307785925 endingPage "93" @default.
- W2307785925 startingPage "89" @default.
- W2307785925 abstract "In the domain of the Ukrainian history of philosophy one can clearly observe symptoms of eclecticism, contamination, and methodological ambiguity. Such situation is rooted in continuous insufficiency of the methodological framework of Ukrainian philosophy, split by competing ideological structures. Critical condition of humanitarian epistemology is aggravated by the urgent need to overtake foreign studies in the corresponding field, which constantly increase in number and evolve in character. The article aims at critical assessment of methodological approaches to historical philosophical analysis within the light of current philosophical studies. Analysis of the relevant literature on the problem of how to identify the character of interference between the target philosophical discourse and the discourse of the historical reconstruction allowed revealing the critical lines of relativist archeology and traditional historiography. Relativist approach is averted from the dimension of concrete texts to logical anachronistic speculations over seemingly evident contextual links. Such strategy is legitimate to sustain logical descriptions of the categories exempted from the certain paradigm but it is useless to reveal factual genealogical links between the discourses of the two philosophers. Descriptive studies seem to fall prey to hermeneutic ambiguity in referring to a set of ideas forming the canon of perennial philosophy. It is proved that historiographical approach enables to objectively examine genetic relations between various corpora of philosophical texts.Nowadays the Ukrainian historico-philosophical science is going through a harsh crisis of methodology, caused by distortion of universal coordinates of scientific thinking allegedly providing the condition of the so-called methodological pluralism. Numerous discussions focus on the question about the very scientific nature of history of philosophy as a branch of knowledge. The tendency which appears to prevail in such disputes defines history of philosophy as philosophy in contrast to the opinion that history of philosophy should be rather seen as approximate to social history." @default.
- W2307785925 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2307785925 creator A5038904243 @default.
- W2307785925 creator A5041876468 @default.
- W2307785925 date "2016-03-27" @default.
- W2307785925 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2307785925 title "Methodology of historical philosophical research within the context of current philosophical process" @default.
- W2307785925 doi "https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2016.1(141).64821" @default.
- W2307785925 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2307785925 type Work @default.
- W2307785925 sameAs 2307785925 @default.
- W2307785925 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2307785925 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2307785925 hasAuthorship W2307785925A5038904243 @default.
- W2307785925 hasAuthorship W2307785925A5041876468 @default.
- W2307785925 hasBestOaLocation W23077859251 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C139172840 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C146079980 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C185305159 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C2777560498 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C49831778 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C111472728 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C138885662 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C139172840 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C144024400 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C146079980 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C158071213 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C166957645 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C17744445 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C185305159 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C199539241 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C2777560498 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C2779343474 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C29598333 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C49831778 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C94625758 @default.
- W2307785925 hasConceptScore W2307785925C95457728 @default.
- W2307785925 hasIssue "1(141)" @default.
- W2307785925 hasLocation W23077859251 @default.
- W2307785925 hasOpenAccess W2307785925 @default.
- W2307785925 hasPrimaryLocation W23077859251 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W1546304166 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W155428411 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W1881194362 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W2008114134 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W2116901976 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W2334405670 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W2498140480 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W2605197710 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W2963359828 @default.
- W2307785925 hasRelatedWork W2184884863 @default.
- W2307785925 hasVolume "0" @default.
- W2307785925 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2307785925 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2307785925 magId "2307785925" @default.
- W2307785925 workType "article" @default.