FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2308098548> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2308098548 abstract "Unsurprisingly, concerns have been raised ‘about the capacity of law to be flexible and manage for the dynamics of linked social-ecological systems.’ Indeed, it has been pointed out that ‘[a] legal system that is linear and largely static is ill-suited for the nonlinear dynamics of linked social-ecological systems.’ This concern has also been raised in relation to the international legal system. An important segment of each legal system, also at the international level, is decision-making by (quasi-)judicial bodies, such as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) or the World Bank Inspection Panel (WBIP, IP). (Quasi-)judicial bodies play an integral role in the interpretation (and thus the making) of international law, given that ‘[t]he meaning of norms is the product of legal practice.’ This particular role of (quasi-)judicial bodies then raises the question whether and to what extent the above-mentioned concerns are applicable to them. Are they able and capable to bring flexibility into the legal system, and thus be resilience-supportive? It is often argued that law, and in particular (quasi-)judicial bodies, are often seen as ‘deterrents to implementing adaptive management’. Indeed, (quasi-)judicial bodies aim to ensure legal certainty and make a final assessment of the legal dispute, both of which seem to contradict the requirement of flexibility. Accordingly, this apparent controversy leads to the question whether and to what extent international (quasi-)judicial bodies are able and capable to balance the arguments from a resilience-driven perspective when they assess (potential) harm relating to natural resources. In order to answer this question, the chapter relies on a case study: it will analyse the extent of resilience-friendliness of international (quasi-)judicial practices in water-related disputes. Due to the transboundary nature of many water resources, international law and management at the international or global level play an important role in maintaining their resilience. The analysis scrutinizes some of the water-related cases of the WBIP, the Arbitral Tribunals of the International Centre for Settlement of Disputes (ICSID) and the ICJ. While the first is a quasi-judicial body, the last two can certainly be qualified as judicial entities. The analysis is extended to the WBIP in order to be able to assess any possible differences between judicial and (quasi-)judicial practices." @default.
• W2308098548 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2308098548 creator A5072385776 @default.
• W2308098548 date "2014-08-31" @default.
• W2308098548 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2308098548 title "Resilience and International (Quasi-)Judicial Bodies: An Uneasy Relationship?" @default.
• W2308098548 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2308098548 type Work @default.
• W2308098548 sameAs 2308098548 @default.
• W2308098548 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2308098548 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2308098548 hasAuthorship W2308098548A5072385776 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C185436325 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C2776968495 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C2779029474 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C2780598303 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C144024400 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C162324750 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C17744445 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C185436325 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C187736073 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C190253527 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C199539241 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C2776968495 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C2777363581 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C2779029474 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C2780598303 @default.
• W2308098548 hasConceptScore W2308098548C55447825 @default.
• W2308098548 hasLocation W23080985481 @default.
• W2308098548 hasOpenAccess W2308098548 @default.
• W2308098548 hasPrimaryLocation W23080985481 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W1870830917 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W1980281174 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2326051572 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2534823135 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2752695662 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2889540889 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2911267287 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2919358215 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2954344122 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W2965128088 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3010199606 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3011871569 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3121187826 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3121844199 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3122032989 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3122435436 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3123710594 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W3200662413 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W362581736 @default.
• W2308098548 hasRelatedWork W830967514 @default.
• W2308098548 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2308098548 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2308098548 magId "2308098548" @default.
• W2308098548 workType "article" @default.