FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2308294788> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2308294788 endingPage "942" @default.
• W2308294788 startingPage "941" @default.
• W2308294788 abstract "In a retrospective analysis classical radial nephrolithotomy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for symptomatic small nonobstructive caliceal stones were compared to evaluate morbidity. Size (less than 1 cm.) and location of the stone (caliceal and nonobstructive) did not explain the severity of the symptoms nor would they have been an indication for an operation. In 8 patients treated by an open operation, 16 treated percutaneously and 6 who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the procedure time, success rate, complication rate and length of hospitalization were analyzed. Followup consisted of ultrasound and/or a plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder 1 day and 3 months postoperatively. A nephrotomogram was included in group 3 patients. Of 30 patients 3 had persistent stone fragments for more than 3 months: 2 underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy and 1 was treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. A total of 28 patients (93.3 per cent) achieved complete or significant relief of pain. In the percutaneous group both patients with persistent fragments were symptomatic in contrast with the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy group, in which 1 patient presented with stone fragments but was free of pain. The group treated percutaneously had a shorter procedure time (60 minutes) and the shock wave group had a shorter hospitalization. On the other hand, the open operation group had a better success rate as well as relief of pain. These observations showed that small, nonobstructive caliceal stones can be responsible for persistent, severe flank pain. Since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is an effective noninvasive procedure that does not require routine anesthesia and hospitalization, with prompt return of the patient to normal life, it must be considered the method of choice in these particular patients." @default.
• W2308294788 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2308294788 creator A5002629084 @default.
• W2308294788 creator A5002673587 @default.
• W2308294788 creator A5039726565 @default.
• W2308294788 creator A5052247872 @default.
• W2308294788 date "1989-10-01" @default.
• W2308294788 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2308294788 title "Small Caliceal Stones: What is the Best Method of Treatment?" @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2019814371 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2041012770 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2059951352 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2114120745 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2133359418 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2404760506 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2412284127 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2418860958 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2418946426 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W2468524590 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W33121467 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W4249379504 @default.
• W2308294788 cites W90902458 @default.
• W2308294788 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38947-4" @default.
• W2308294788 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2795747" @default.
• W2308294788 hasPublicationYear "1989" @default.
• W2308294788 type Work @default.
• W2308294788 sameAs 2308294788 @default.
• W2308294788 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2308294788 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2308294788 hasAuthorship W2308294788A5002629084 @default.
• W2308294788 hasAuthorship W2308294788A5002673587 @default.
• W2308294788 hasAuthorship W2308294788A5039726565 @default.
• W2308294788 hasAuthorship W2308294788A5052247872 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C2777756408 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C2777950166 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C2779915274 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C2780885103 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C126838900 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C141071460 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C143753070 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C2777756408 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C2777950166 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C2779915274 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C2780813298 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C2780885103 @default.
• W2308294788 hasConceptScore W2308294788C71924100 @default.
• W2308294788 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2308294788 hasLocation W23082947881 @default.
• W2308294788 hasLocation W23082947882 @default.
• W2308294788 hasOpenAccess W2308294788 @default.
• W2308294788 hasPrimaryLocation W23082947881 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2014376910 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2071521729 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2074907747 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2142123265 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2168781296 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2416880773 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2419433539 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W2905470517 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W4246280736 @default.
• W2308294788 hasRelatedWork W4300518785 @default.
• W2308294788 hasVolume "142" @default.
• W2308294788 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2308294788 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2308294788 magId "2308294788" @default.
• W2308294788 workType "article" @default.