FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2310607324> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2310607324 endingPage "653" @default.
• W2310607324 startingPage "644" @default.
• W2310607324 abstract "<b><i>Background:</i></b> Robotic rollators enhance the basic functions of established devices by technically advanced physical, cognitive, or sensory support to increase autonomy in persons with severe impairment. In the evaluation of such ambient assisted living solutions, both the technical and user perspectives are important to prove usability, effectiveness and safety, and to ensure adequate device application. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the methodology of studies evaluating robotic rollators with focus on the user perspective and to give recommendations for future evaluation studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A systematic literature search up to December 31, 2014, was conducted based on the Cochrane Review methodology using the electronic databases PubMed and IEEE Xplore. Articles were selected according to the following inclusion criteria: evaluation studies of robotic rollators documenting human-robot interaction, no case reports, published in English language. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-eight studies were identified that met the predefined inclusion criteria. Large heterogeneity in the definitions of the target user group, study populations, study designs and assessment methods was found across the included studies. No generic methodology to evaluate robotic rollators could be identified. We found major methodological shortcomings related to insufficient sample descriptions and sample sizes, and lack of appropriate, standardized and validated assessment methods. Long-term use in habitual environment was also not evaluated. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Apart from the heterogeneity, methodological deficits in most of the identified studies became apparent. Recommendations for future evaluation studies include: clear definition of target user group, adequate selection of subjects, inclusion of other assistive mobility devices for comparison, evaluation of the habitual use of advanced prototypes, adequate assessment strategy with established, standardized and validated methods, and statistical analysis of study results. Assessment strategies may additionally focus on specific functionalities of the robotic rollators allowing an individually tailored assessment of innovative features to document their added value." @default.
• W2310607324 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2310607324 creator A5004948999 @default.
• W2310607324 creator A5011608504 @default.
• W2310607324 creator A5012129693 @default.
• W2310607324 creator A5076509870 @default.
• W2310607324 creator A5083668298 @default.
• W2310607324 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2310607324 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2310607324 title "Evaluation Studies of Robotic Rollators by the User Perspective: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1501390635 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1523779020 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1525849288 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1570306703 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1572957632 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1763775273 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1970030681 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1985472051 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1987020153 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1994252528 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1995083258 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1995212779 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W1995219715 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2004008756 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2018755431 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2029640771 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2032568497 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2045063968 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2060531350 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2064439690 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2070071650 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2084254617 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2097914614 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2101358012 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2105391345 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2136156303 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2140043731 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2146421658 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2149304427 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2157484716 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2158812661 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2162904986 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2163772921 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2167661483 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2167791418 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2170419980 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2178720948 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2322084628 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W2324077891 @default.
• W2310607324 cites W4246174018 @default.
• W2310607324 doi "https://doi.org/10.1159/000444878" @default.
• W2310607324 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27008089" @default.
• W2310607324 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2310607324 type Work @default.
• W2310607324 sameAs 2310607324 @default.
• W2310607324 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2310607324 countsByYear W23106073242017 @default.
• W2310607324 countsByYear W23106073242020 @default.
• W2310607324 countsByYear W23106073242021 @default.
• W2310607324 countsByYear W23106073242022 @default.
• W2310607324 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2310607324 hasAuthorship W2310607324A5004948999 @default.
• W2310607324 hasAuthorship W2310607324A5011608504 @default.
• W2310607324 hasAuthorship W2310607324A5012129693 @default.
• W2310607324 hasAuthorship W2310607324A5076509870 @default.
• W2310607324 hasAuthorship W2310607324A5083668298 @default.
• W2310607324 hasBestOaLocation W23106073241 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C107457646 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C109359841 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C15744967 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C170130773 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C17744445 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C189708586 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C199539241 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C2779473830 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C41008148 @default.
• W2310607324 hasConceptScore W2310607324C77805123 @default.
• W2310607324 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2310607324 hasLocation W23106073241 @default.
• W2310607324 hasLocation W23106073242 @default.
• W2310607324 hasLocation W23106073243 @default.
• W2310607324 hasOpenAccess W2310607324 @default.
• W2310607324 hasPrimaryLocation W23106073241 @default.
• W2310607324 hasRelatedWork W1558850179 @default.
• W2310607324 hasRelatedWork W1578529736 @default.
• W2310607324 hasRelatedWork W1987608637 @default.
• W2310607324 hasRelatedWork W2374256025 @default.
• W2310607324 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.

• next