FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2313062005> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2313062005 endingPage "910" @default.
• W2313062005 startingPage "906" @default.
• W2313062005 abstract "BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of severe maternal morbidity, cardiac arrest, and death during the hospitalization for childbirth. Protocol-driven care has been associated with improved outcomes in many settings; the National Partnership for Maternal Safety now recommends that PPH protocols be implemented in every labor and delivery unit in the United States. In this study, we sought to identify the level of PPH protocol availability in academic United States obstetric units. We hypothesized that the majority (>80%) of academic obstetric anesthesia units would have a PPH protocol in place. METHODS: A survey was developed by an expert panel. Domains included hospital characteristics, availability of PPH protocol or plans to develop such a protocol, and protocol components included in the upcoming National Partnership for Maternal Safety obstetric hemorrhage safety bundle initiative. The electronic survey was emailed to the 104 directors of United States academic obstetric anesthesia units. Responses were stratified by PPH protocol availability as appropriate. Univariate statistics were used to characterize survey responses and the probability distribution for PPH protocol availability was estimated using the binomial distribution. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 58%. The percentage of responding units with a PPH protocol was lower than hypothesized (P = 0.03); there was a PPH protocol in 67% of responding units (N = 40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 53%–78%). The median annual delivery volume for responding units with PPH protocol was 3900 vs 2300 for units without PPH protocol (P = 0.002), with no difference in cesarean delivery rate (P = 0.73) or observed PPH rate (P = 0.69). There was no difference in annual delivery volume between responding and nonresponding hospitals (P = 0.06), suggesting that academic centers with delivery volume >3200 births per year are more likely than smaller volume hospitals to have a PPH protocol in place (odds ratio 3.16 (95% CI: 1.01–9.90). Adjusting for delivery volume among nonresponding hospitals, we estimate that 67% (95% CI: 55%–77%) of all academic obstetric anesthesia units had a PPH protocol in place at the time of this survey. Institutional processes for escalation do not correlate with the presence of a PPH protocol. There was a massive transfusion protocol in 95% of units with a PPH protocol and in 90% of units without (95% CI of difference: −7% to 7%). A PPH code team or rapid response team was available in 57% of responding institutions, with no difference between units with or without a PPH protocol [mean difference 4%, 95% CI (−24% to 32%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing emphasis on national quality improvement in patient safety, there are no PPH protocols in at least 20% of U.S. academic obstetric anesthesia units. Delivery volume is the most important variable predicting the presence of a PPH protocol. National efforts to ensure universal presence of a PPH protocol in all academic centers will achieve the greatest impact by focusing on small-volume facilities. Future work is needed to evaluate and facilitate PPH implementation in nonacademic obstetric units." @default.
• W2313062005 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2313062005 creator A5032772303 @default.
• W2313062005 creator A5038528618 @default.
• W2313062005 creator A5065387249 @default.
• W2313062005 creator A5066110283 @default.
• W2313062005 creator A5076029952 @default.
• W2313062005 date "2014-10-01" @default.
• W2313062005 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2313062005 title "The Use of Postpartum Hemorrhage Protocols in United States Academic Obstetric Anesthesia Units" @default.
• W2313062005 cites W1548167734 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W1995100991 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2028646029 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2033605703 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2058927033 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2077768343 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2109222523 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2148274435 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2171743519 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2316746280 @default.
• W2313062005 cites W2400126132 @default.
• W2313062005 doi "https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000000399" @default.
• W2313062005 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25238236" @default.
• W2313062005 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2313062005 type Work @default.
• W2313062005 sameAs 2313062005 @default.
• W2313062005 citedByCount "54" @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052015 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052016 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052017 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052018 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052019 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052020 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052021 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052022 @default.
• W2313062005 countsByYear W23130620052023 @default.
• W2313062005 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2313062005 hasAuthorship W2313062005A5032772303 @default.
• W2313062005 hasAuthorship W2313062005A5038528618 @default.
• W2313062005 hasAuthorship W2313062005A5065387249 @default.
• W2313062005 hasAuthorship W2313062005A5066110283 @default.
• W2313062005 hasAuthorship W2313062005A5076029952 @default.
• W2313062005 hasBestOaLocation W23130620051 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C2779703513 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C2780385302 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C3020366425 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C126322002 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C131872663 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C142724271 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C194828623 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C204787440 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C2779234561 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C2779703513 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C2780385302 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C3020366425 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C44249647 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C54355233 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C71924100 @default.
• W2313062005 hasConceptScore W2313062005C86803240 @default.
• W2313062005 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2313062005 hasLocation W23130620051 @default.
• W2313062005 hasLocation W23130620052 @default.
• W2313062005 hasLocation W23130620053 @default.
• W2313062005 hasOpenAccess W2313062005 @default.
• W2313062005 hasPrimaryLocation W23130620051 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W1988643756 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W2418172017 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W295153296 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W2979685668 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W3032132160 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W3139108370 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W3165304143 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W4242102030 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W4293231123 @default.
• W2313062005 hasRelatedWork W4319999316 @default.
• W2313062005 hasVolume "119" @default.
• W2313062005 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2313062005 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2313062005 magId "2313062005" @default.
• W2313062005 workType "article" @default.