FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2313270873> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2313270873 abstract "Lewis Caroll's ‘The Hunting of the Snark’ – subtitled ‘An Agony in Eight Fits’ – was a nonsense poem. Its use in the title of this essay1 is, in itself, very fitting. The objections to a national drug chart, made by Barber et al.1 in this issue of the JRSM, lack credibility.First, there is substantial evidence from the Australia, that a National Drugs Chart can reduce errors. Barber et al.1 have misinterpreted the study by Coombes et al.2, showing a reduction in prescribing errors, by adopting a National Drugs Chart. Whether some of the error reduction was due to an improved prescription form is hardly a reason for challenging its overall generalizability. On the contrary, it demonstrates what can be achieved. Moreover, Coombes et al.2 not only showed a substantial reduction in overall prescribing errors but also reduced rates in each of 11 out of 12 individual types of error. For example, re-prescription of drugs to which patients had previously had an adverse reaction to a product in the same class, fell by over 50%. And there was a significant decrease in the potential risks associated with warfarin therapy.Secondly Barber et al.1 believe that undergraduate and postgraduate medical and nursing student need more, and better, education on the use of Drug Charts. I am sure they are right. But ensuring the availability of adequate training materials, across every National Health survey (NHS) Trust each with its own Drug Chart, is fanciful and unnecessary. Much better to draw up a National Drug Chart, with associated training materials, available to all.Thirdly, a National Drugs Chart, together with an online training package can be delivered and accepted in a UK environment.3 The claim that, because Wales is relatively small and homogeneous, it is a poor example for England is disingenuous. We, in England, should be prepared to adopt good practice that leads to an improved quality care, irrespective of its provenance.Fourthly Barber et al.1 claim that it is fallacious to think one chart is sufficient. Of course it is not enough. Eventually we need to standardize all of our hospital charts but – in the meantime – let us get the most widely used one sorted out. Barber et al.1 also seem to believe that local charts are needed to meet local CQUIN targets. That is sheer nonsense and indicates a lack of understanding about the various schemes now in place to encourage high quality of care.Finally the argument that, because electronic prescribing is increasingly prevalent in UK hospitals, standardized drug charts will soon be defunct is yet more nonsense. Only a minority of hospitals have e-prescribing available for inpatients; and it will be years before this is common across the NHS. In the meantime we should stop messing around and introduce a National Drugs Chart – for inpatients – and have done with it.It is curious that, at a time when hospital doctors who prescribe drugs and nurses who administer them, are all clamouring for a National Drugs Chart, it is opposed by a coterie of pharmacists. The Royal College of Physicians of London have developed a National Drugs Chart and are asking their fellows to press for its introduction in their own NHS institutions in England. I hope that their local hospital pharmacists back them." @default.
• W2313270873 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2313270873 creator A5001026228 @default.
• W2313270873 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2313270873 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2313270873 title "Article Commentary: Of snarks, boojums and national drug charts" @default.
• W2313270873 cites W1500246797 @default.
• W2313270873 cites W2118456474 @default.
• W2313270873 doi "https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2012.12k084" @default.
• W2313270873 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3556803" @default.
• W2313270873 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23358273" @default.
• W2313270873 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2313270873 type Work @default.
• W2313270873 sameAs 2313270873 @default.
• W2313270873 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2313270873 countsByYear W23132708732015 @default.
• W2313270873 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2313270873 hasAuthorship W2313270873A5001026228 @default.
• W2313270873 hasBestOaLocation W23132708731 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C190812933 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C105795698 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C159110408 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C17744445 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C190812933 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C199539241 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C2426938 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C2780224610 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C33923547 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C41008148 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C42475967 @default.
• W2313270873 hasConceptScore W2313270873C71924100 @default.
• W2313270873 hasLocation W23132708731 @default.
• W2313270873 hasLocation W23132708732 @default.
• W2313270873 hasLocation W23132708733 @default.
• W2313270873 hasLocation W23132708734 @default.
• W2313270873 hasOpenAccess W2313270873 @default.
• W2313270873 hasPrimaryLocation W23132708731 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W126110005 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W1553761100 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W1563667313 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W184369365 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W1966175551 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W1974624636 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W1985152220 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W1999828917 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2008006775 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2039987271 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W206593897 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2078960488 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2092815772 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2152222192 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2413177091 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2468823140 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W317747196 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W37965913 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W3966157 @default.
• W2313270873 hasRelatedWork W2974765892 @default.
• W2313270873 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2313270873 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2313270873 magId "2313270873" @default.
• W2313270873 workType "article" @default.