FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2313448546> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2313448546 endingPage "S331" @default.
• W2313448546 startingPage "S328" @default.
• W2313448546 abstract "Introduction Multiple techniques exist for reduction mammoplasty, but no singular consensus exists as to which method is the most effective in providing an aesthetically pleasing breast. We reviewed our institution's reduction mammoplasty experience over a 2-year period to evaluate aesthetic and surgical outcomes comparing superiorly based pedicles with skin excisions resulting in either an inverted T or vertical scar. Methods An IRB-approved retrospective review of our institution's surgical database identified patient characteristics and outcomes of all breast reductions performed over a 2-year period (n = 104). A subgroup analysis of patients with complete preoperative and postoperative photographs (n = 56) evaluated postoperative aesthetics on a scale of 1 to 5 (1, poor; 5, excellent). Results Techniques included a superomedial pedicle with an inverted T-pattern skin excision (n = 81) and pure vertical reduction (n = 23). There was no significant difference in complications between techniques. Common patient risk factors (age, body mass index [BMI], and smoking status) did not correlate with postoperative complications. In the photograph analysis subgroup, inverted T scar pattern reductions had a significantly better scar quality score (3.5 vs 3.2, P < 0.05). In analysis of all subjects, volume of tissue resected was a significant factor in determining overall aesthetic score, with resections of less than 1300 g being significantly associated with an overall aesthetic score of 4 or higher. Logistic regression demonstrated patient age younger than 40 years was a significant contributor to aesthetic score of 4 or higher (P < 0.05). Discussion We reviewed our institution's experience with 2 common breast reduction techniques. Better scarring was associated with inverted T scar pattern versus vertical pattern. Additionally, rather than pedicle type or skin excision pattern, patient age and weight of tissue resected were the most important contributors to an aesthetically optimal outcome. This study suggests that a single superlative technique does not exist. Rather, inherent patient characteristics are most important in provision of the best aesthetic outcome." @default.
• W2313448546 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2313448546 creator A5003045379 @default.
• W2313448546 creator A5040428756 @default.
• W2313448546 creator A5048250137 @default.
• W2313448546 creator A5067228444 @default.
• W2313448546 creator A5087805172 @default.
• W2313448546 date "2016-06-01" @default.
• W2313448546 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2313448546 title "Comparative Outcomes and Quality Analysis of Inverted-T and Pure Vertical Scar Techniques in Superomedial Pedicle Reduction Mammaplasty" @default.
• W2313448546 cites W1984391343 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2024008512 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2028251064 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2039167180 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2040745156 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2071995419 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2073971402 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2076349649 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2092197287 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2092477906 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2094288770 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2094530741 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2101139002 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2101816876 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2121619707 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W2262616197 @default.
• W2313448546 cites W4300075084 @default.
• W2313448546 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000000732" @default.
• W2313448546 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27015329" @default.
• W2313448546 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2313448546 type Work @default.
• W2313448546 sameAs 2313448546 @default.
• W2313448546 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2313448546 countsByYear W23134485462017 @default.
• W2313448546 countsByYear W23134485462018 @default.
• W2313448546 countsByYear W23134485462019 @default.
• W2313448546 countsByYear W23134485462021 @default.
• W2313448546 countsByYear W23134485462022 @default.
• W2313448546 countsByYear W23134485462023 @default.
• W2313448546 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2313448546 hasAuthorship W2313448546A5003045379 @default.
• W2313448546 hasAuthorship W2313448546A5040428756 @default.
• W2313448546 hasAuthorship W2313448546A5048250137 @default.
• W2313448546 hasAuthorship W2313448546A5067228444 @default.
• W2313448546 hasAuthorship W2313448546A5087805172 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C2778579461 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C2781037480 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C2910018596 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C111335779 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C121608353 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C126322002 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C141071460 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C151956035 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C167135981 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C187960798 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C2524010 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C2778579461 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C2780221984 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C2781037480 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C2910018596 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C33923547 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C530470458 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C71924100 @default.
• W2313448546 hasConceptScore W2313448546C95190672 @default.
• W2313448546 hasIssue "Supplement 4" @default.
• W2313448546 hasLocation W23134485461 @default.
• W2313448546 hasLocation W23134485462 @default.
• W2313448546 hasOpenAccess W2313448546 @default.
• W2313448546 hasPrimaryLocation W23134485461 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W141594980 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W1911590278 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W1968261579 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W2049593331 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W2062521683 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W2410015965 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W2442498019 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W2789434087 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W2977676222 @default.
• W2313448546 hasRelatedWork W2096390714 @default.
• W2313448546 hasVolume "76" @default.
• W2313448546 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2313448546 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2313448546 magId "2313448546" @default.
• W2313448546 workType "article" @default.