FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2313492067> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2313492067 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyMale Voiding Dysfunction (BPH & Incontinence) & Infection1 Apr 2012V1028 ROBOTIC SUPRAPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR SEVERE BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA Wesley White, James Bienvenu, Eric Brewer, W. Bedford Waters, and Frederick Klein Wesley WhiteWesley White Knoxville, TN More articles by this author , James BienvenuJames Bienvenu Knoxville, TN More articles by this author , Eric BrewerEric Brewer Birmingham, AL More articles by this author , W. Bedford WatersW. Bedford Waters Knoxville, TN More articles by this author , and Frederick KleinFrederick Klein Knoxville, TN More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1132AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Conventional treatment of BPH includes α-1 adrenergic antagonists, 5 α reductase inhibitors, and minimally invasive procedures including TUMT and TUNA. Men with urinary retention, recurrent UTIs, prostate hemorrhage, bladder calculi, renal insufficiency, and/or symptoms unresponsive to medical therapy may be appropriate candidates for TURP or open prostatectomy. Compared to TURP, open prostatectomy offers a lower retreatment rate, more complete removal of the prostatic adenoma under direct vision, and avoids the potential for TURP syndrome. However, open prostatectomy is associated with an increased risk of perioperative hemorrhage and the need for a longer hospitalization and convalescence. Many of the aforementioned disadvantages with open prostatectomy were likewise common with radical retropubic prostatectomy before the advent of robotics. We present our experience with robotic suprapubic prostatectomy for the treatment of severe BPH. METHODS A 66 year old male presented with BPH refractory to medical therapy. Preoperative AUA symptom score was 26 and postvoid residual volume was 375cc. Maximum voiding flow rate preoperatively was 7.2mL/sec. The patient underwent transrectal ultrasound with a calculated volume of 175g. Treatment options were discussed with the patient in detail. Following informed consent, robotic suprapubic prostatectomy was performed. With the patient in the lithotomy position, a conventional 5 port configuration was employed. The bladder was dropped and the space of Retzius developed. The bladder was filled and a cystotomy created. The adenoma was circumferentially enucleated using blunt and sharp dissection. The enucleation bed was rendered hemostatic with pinpoint cautery. The incised mucosa of the posterior bladder neck was tacked to the prostate capsule using a running 3-0 Vicryl suture. The cystotomy was closed in multiple layers using absorbable suture. RESULTS Operative time was 123 minutes. Estimated blood loss was 50cc. There were no acute intraoperative or postoperative complications. Postoperative postvoid residual volume was 23cc. Postoperative AUA symptom score was 3. CONCLUSIONS Based on our experience, robotic simple prostatectomy is safe, effective, and minimizes many of the disadvantages traditionally associated with the open approach. The decision to approach the prostate through a suprapubic or retropubic approach is predicated on patient factors and the discretion of the operating surgeon. Further study is needed to determine the appropriate patient selection, efficacy and/or superiority as compared to TURP. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e418 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Wesley White Knoxville, TN More articles by this author James Bienvenu Knoxville, TN More articles by this author Eric Brewer Birmingham, AL More articles by this author W. Bedford Waters Knoxville, TN More articles by this author Frederick Klein Knoxville, TN More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2313492067 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2313492067 creator A5025011922 @default.
• W2313492067 creator A5037906042 @default.
• W2313492067 creator A5041373377 @default.
• W2313492067 creator A5055576821 @default.
• W2313492067 creator A5065793600 @default.
• W2313492067 date "2012-04-01" @default.
• W2313492067 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2313492067 title "V1028 ROBOTIC SUPRAPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR SEVERE BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA" @default.
• W2313492067 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1132" @default.
• W2313492067 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2313492067 type Work @default.
• W2313492067 sameAs 2313492067 @default.
• W2313492067 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2313492067 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2313492067 hasAuthorship W2313492067A5025011922 @default.
• W2313492067 hasAuthorship W2313492067A5037906042 @default.
• W2313492067 hasAuthorship W2313492067A5041373377 @default.
• W2313492067 hasAuthorship W2313492067A5055576821 @default.
• W2313492067 hasAuthorship W2313492067A5065793600 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C2777428134 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C2777562237 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C2910468371 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C121608353 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C126322002 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C126894567 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C2776235491 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C2777428134 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C2777562237 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C2779466945 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C2910468371 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C61434518 @default.
• W2313492067 hasConceptScore W2313492067C71924100 @default.
• W2313492067 hasIssue "4S" @default.
• W2313492067 hasLocation W23134920671 @default.
• W2313492067 hasOpenAccess W2313492067 @default.
• W2313492067 hasPrimaryLocation W23134920671 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W1989730849 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2011171617 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2063570436 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2110027505 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2149018136 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2283498514 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2371954747 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2385318692 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W4205608629 @default.
• W2313492067 hasRelatedWork W2187004699 @default.
• W2313492067 hasVolume "187" @default.
• W2313492067 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2313492067 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2313492067 magId "2313492067" @default.
• W2313492067 workType "article" @default.