FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2313884327> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2313884327 endingPage "29" @default.
• W2313884327 startingPage "29" @default.
• W2313884327 abstract "This paper examines the spatial segregation of immigrants from the provincial departments within the city of Paris in 1911 and attempts to relate similarities in internal distributions to similarities in regional origins. Data are examined from the 1911 census which gives for each of 88 departments the location of their emigrants within each of the twenty arrondissements of the city. The evidence is that the migrants from certain departments were spatially segregated and that there was a general inverse relationship between the degree of segregation and the number of migrants involved. Classification of origins on the basis of internal similarities produced distinct regional groupings of sending departments. THE study of patterns of migration to cities is a subject of considerable contemporary relevance, for in most of the countries of the developed world the nineteenth and twentieth centuries have been characterized by a rapid redistribution of population in favour of urban areas. This process has attracted much attention, but one of the more neglected aspects, particularly in an historical context, has been the actual destinations of provincial migrants within the city and the degree to which these immigrant groups are segregated both residentially and socially within the growing city. In the general field of contemporary urban studies, however, much interest has been focused upon the spatial and social circumstances of migrant and minority groups in the city. Particular attention has been directed towards their social standing and in both human ecology and urban social geography the rationale adopted has stressed the spatial evidence for social acceptance and success. Much of the empirical evidence is found in the American literature (Jackle, 1967), but here immigrant status is often combined with colour to exaggerate segregation and prohibit integration. The Australian literature (e.g. Burnley, 1972; Stimpson, I970) is perhaps more relevant to the present theme, but has concentrated on moves from the rural to the urban environment which have involved a change of country as well. Within Western Europe much of the work on urban immigrants has been contemporary and little attention has been devoted in an historical context to the migrants themselves. The growth of Paris has attracted much scholarly attention, but, when the location of the origins and destinations of the immigrant population has been the concern, only one or two groups have been considered. More wide-ranging studies have been precluded by the great volume of the available data. Very important studies of the development of the city's population have been contributed by Chevalier (I950, I957, 1958),' Bertillon (1895), Chombart de Lauwe (I952), Pourcher (1964) and Pouthas (I953). Several papers (e.g., Chatelain, I97I; Pinkney, I953) have concentrated in part on similar sources and situations to those reviewed in this paper, whilst the nature of a particular regional group, for example the Auvergnats, has attracted the attention of many a novelist or contemporary writer (Chevalier, I950, p. 205)." @default.
• W2313884327 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2313884327 creator A5031135128 @default.
• W2313884327 creator A5074430611 @default.
• W2313884327 date "1975-07-01" @default.
• W2313884327 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2313884327 title "The Residential Segregation of Provincial Migrants in Paris in 1911" @default.
• W2313884327 cites W1537911641 @default.
• W2313884327 cites W2048097816 @default.
• W2313884327 cites W2071568369 @default.
• W2313884327 cites W2335011138 @default.
• W2313884327 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/621608" @default.
• W2313884327 hasPublicationYear "1975" @default.
• W2313884327 type Work @default.
• W2313884327 sameAs 2313884327 @default.
• W2313884327 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2313884327 countsByYear W23138843272012 @default.
• W2313884327 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2313884327 hasAuthorship W2313884327A5031135128 @default.
• W2313884327 hasAuthorship W2313884327A5074430611 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConcept C4249254 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConceptScore W2313884327C144024400 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConceptScore W2313884327C149923435 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConceptScore W2313884327C162324750 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConceptScore W2313884327C205649164 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConceptScore W2313884327C4249254 @default.
• W2313884327 hasConceptScore W2313884327C45355965 @default.
• W2313884327 hasIssue "65" @default.
• W2313884327 hasLocation W23138843271 @default.
• W2313884327 hasOpenAccess W2313884327 @default.
• W2313884327 hasPrimaryLocation W23138843271 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W2324742297 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W2744942970 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W2994325242 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W3016466710 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W4226205744 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W4249348840 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W4283802390 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W2184455756 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W2291893536 @default.
• W2313884327 hasRelatedWork W2611497786 @default.
• W2313884327 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2313884327 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2313884327 magId "2313884327" @default.
• W2313884327 workType "article" @default.