FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2314278815> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2314278815 abstract "In this paper, by using the method of questionnaire, teaching experiment,logical analysis and mathematical statistics, the process evaluation of our 4 Boys Junior tennis classes was studied. The experimental results show that, the process of evaluation in the teaching of tennis transfer from the focus on students' learning results to pay more attention to students' learning process, evaluation of student learning is more objective, comprehensive and timely. It can not only give full play to students' personality, cultivate students' Autonomous Learning ability, and make students form the cooperative learning atmosphere, establish cooperation relationship, more conducive to improving teaching effect. Compared with the control group at the end of the semester, students in the experimental group can significantly enhance students’ the short distance sprint ability, lower extremity bouncing, upper body strength and flexibility, but also in the 50 meter dash and pull-up are increased more significantly; the level of tennis technique is better than that of the control group; there are significant differences in learning attitude and the spirit of cooperation, affective performance level. KEYWORD: colleges; tennis teaching; process evaluation; difference International Conference on Social Science, Education Management and Sports Education (SSEMSE 2015) © 2015. The authors Published by Atlantis Press 2001 education evaluation, evaluation of sports and tennis teaching evaluation and other related articles, books, understand this topic research present situation and tendency, and the related data collection and analysis. 1.2.2 Questionnaire investigation According to the research purpose and content, this paper design “the ordinary university tennis teaching process evaluation index screening questionnaire”. Beijing is engaged in the research of tennis teaching physical education teachers in university, to determine the content of student achievement evaluation of different dimensions. 1.2.3 Teaching experimental method Test time: March to June in 2013. Experimental control: randomly selected two classes as experimental group with 68 people; 2 class for the control group with 64 people. Before the trial was carried out on the experimental group and the control-group students body quality initial level testing, to eliminate the influence of the independent variables. According to the result of expert evaluation, the first set experimental procedural student performance evaluation system: including three parts: selfevaluation of students, students mutual, teacher evaluation. Design “the college tennis special class students learning attitude, affective expression and cooperation spirit questionnaire”. In order to ensure the validity of the questionnaire, once again to Beijing colleges and universities sports education expert questionnaire, according to the opinions of the experts to modify the problem of the questionnaire and finishing, questionnaire items listed and classified structure has high validity. Then issue the revised questionnaire for the experimental group and the control group students. Questionnaire after recovery, 15 students in the experimental group and control group randomly, retest reliability inspection with the result of the two related inspection, correlation coefficient r = 0.87. Teachers guide and supervise to the students' selfevaluation, mutual process and methods. Every 5 weeks on a periodic evaluation, phased evaluation content, evaluation study manner, the cordiality performance and the cooperation spirit, technology evaluation, a total of 2 times. The teacher wants to in a timely manner will result feedback and evaluation to the students, let students immediately understand their own learning situation, the result of the According to the evaluation of student performance to evaluate content again at the end of the semester. Student achievement evaluation content: basic physical fitness test, tennis technical test, learning attitude and cordiality cooperation performance evaluation, and formulate the corresponding evaluation criteria at the end of the semester. Control group with the traditional one-time summative evaluation. The experimental group and the control group at the end of the semester student achievement evaluation content exactly the same. 1.2.4 Logic analysis With the result of the experiment, experiment paper summarizes problems arising from the use of logic theory and contrastive analysis. 1.2.5 Data statistics Make use of Excel XP and SPSS17.0 statistical analysis and process for the experimental data. 2 THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY AND ANALYSIS Process evaluation is since the 1980s, gradually formed a kind of evaluation model, the evaluation is to point to in the process of curriculum implementation way to evaluate students' learning, evaluation and more flexible way, its basic idea is to implement evaluation in learning, to promote learning in the evaluation, provide feedback of teaching, so as to continuously improve and perfect teaching. It argues that evaluation process and the teaching process of crossover and integration, take aim and process of value orientation, to student's learning process, effects, and closely related to learning non-intelligence factors comprehensive evaluation, is a kind of internal and external combination, open a way of evaluation. Compared with the traditional summative evaluation, process evaluation on the evaluation function and the core of all significant changes have taken place, is not only pay attention to the result of evaluation, and more attention to students' learning process evaluation, and emphasizing the goals and process. 2.1 Do physical fitness index tests and statistical tests at the beginning of the semester for the experimental group and the control group students The beginning of the semester, five of the experimental group and the control group students physical fitness index and learning attitude and cooperation of affection index test, T test was carried out on the test scores (see table 1, 2), the results showed that four class of students' physique level and learning attitude an d cordiality spirit of cooperation, there was no significant difference on statistics can be thought of from the same overall, conform to the requirements of the teaching experiment statistical grouping." @default.
• W2314278815 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2314278815 creator A5090423817 @default.
• W2314278815 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2314278815 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2314278815 title "Experimental Study on the Process of Evaluation in University Tennis Teaching" @default.
• W2314278815 doi "https://doi.org/10.2991/ssemse-15.2015.507" @default.
• W2314278815 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2314278815 type Work @default.
• W2314278815 sameAs 2314278815 @default.
• W2314278815 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2314278815 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2314278815 hasAuthorship W2314278815A5090423817 @default.
• W2314278815 hasBestOaLocation W23142788151 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C2776090536 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C2776868573 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C2780598303 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C59364581 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C71406770 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C105795698 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C111919701 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C115903868 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C127413603 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C133462117 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C145420912 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C154945302 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C15744967 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C2775924081 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C2776090536 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C2776868573 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C2780598303 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C33923547 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C41008148 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C59364581 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C71406770 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C88610354 @default.
• W2314278815 hasConceptScore W2314278815C98045186 @default.
• W2314278815 hasLocation W23142788151 @default.
• W2314278815 hasOpenAccess W2314278815 @default.
• W2314278815 hasPrimaryLocation W23142788151 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W1543397940 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2349284881 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2354489671 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2358590598 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2359507167 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2360268400 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2364631333 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2366590068 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2368621080 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2370940934 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2376180913 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2385065838 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2385789946 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2388098352 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2388295412 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2389041816 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2391275337 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2887060776 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W2898946132 @default.
• W2314278815 hasRelatedWork W3035235326 @default.
• W2314278815 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2314278815 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2314278815 magId "2314278815" @default.
• W2314278815 workType "article" @default.