FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2314477673> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2314477673 endingPage "66" @default.
• W2314477673 startingPage "63" @default.
• W2314477673 abstract "A real leachate sample, taken from a Kuala Lumpur suburban area, was used in order to investigate the efficiency of electrocoagulation using Fe electrodes as both cathodes and anodes to reduce chemical oxygen demand (COD) and color of the sample. The effects of pH value and current density on the efficiency of the leachate treatment were investigated. Meanwhile, it was well understood that using this approach for the treatment of the studied leachate could successfully lower the COD value and color of the leachate wastewater by 81% and 72%, respectively. To the knowledge of the authors, to date, no real leachate samples have been treated by electrocoagulation methods elsewhere. Reference (2) has extensively covered the advantages and drawbacks of various contemporary approaches in landfill leachate treatments. Compared to current treatment processes available today, electrocoagulation can benefit from equipment simplicity; potable, clear, colorless and odorless treated product (6); much larger and stable flocs containing less bound water showing sufficient acid resistance compared to chemical flocs which enables them to be filtered by means of membranes; production of effluents with less total dissolved solids (TDS) content compared to chemical treatments which results in lower water recovery cost in case of water reuse (8); the capability of removing the smallest colloidal particles due to the facilitated coagulation by means of applied electric field (5 ); the absence of chemicals and as a result no secondary pollution which is common in membrane cleaning processes and many other treatment systems. Reference (6) investigated the use of electrocoagulation to treat landfill leachate using surface response methodology. They studied the effects of current density, pH, time and fluid conductivity and the interaction between them to get an optimal turbidity removal. Reference (7) used aluminium plates to electrocoagulate a leachate which had showed low biodegradability and high concentration of macromolecules and then made a quantitative comparison with classical coagulation-flocculation with aluminium ions and also electrolysis alone. This article investigates the application of electrocoagulation in the treatment of a real sample of landfill leachate. The experiments in this study were all carried out in a batch mode in order to evaluate the effects of different operational variables including leachate pH and current density and their effects on the COD and color removal of the leachate wastewater." @default.
• W2314477673 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2314477673 creator A5017593708 @default.
• W2314477673 creator A5024398566 @default.
• W2314477673 creator A5060341879 @default.
• W2314477673 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2314477673 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2314477673 title "Treatment of a Malaysian Leachate Sample Using Electrocoagulation" @default.
• W2314477673 cites W1974989426 @default.
• W2314477673 cites W1992792582 @default.
• W2314477673 cites W2023685949 @default.
• W2314477673 cites W2027531877 @default.
• W2314477673 cites W2122095533 @default.
• W2314477673 cites W2185451834 @default.
• W2314477673 cites W2613524102 @default.
• W2314477673 doi "https://doi.org/10.7763/ijcea.2012.v3.161" @default.
• W2314477673 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2314477673 type Work @default.
• W2314477673 sameAs 2314477673 @default.
• W2314477673 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2314477673 countsByYear W23144776732013 @default.
• W2314477673 countsByYear W23144776732015 @default.
• W2314477673 countsByYear W23144776732016 @default.
• W2314477673 countsByYear W23144776732018 @default.
• W2314477673 countsByYear W23144776732019 @default.
• W2314477673 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2314477673 hasAuthorship W2314477673A5017593708 @default.
• W2314477673 hasAuthorship W2314477673A5024398566 @default.
• W2314477673 hasAuthorship W2314477673A5060341879 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C107872376 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C16925390 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C2777828583 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConcept C87717796 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C107872376 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C16925390 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C185592680 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C198531522 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C2777828583 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C39432304 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C43617362 @default.
• W2314477673 hasConceptScore W2314477673C87717796 @default.
• W2314477673 hasLocation W23144776731 @default.
• W2314477673 hasOpenAccess W2314477673 @default.
• W2314477673 hasPrimaryLocation W23144776731 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2080997825 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2085899587 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2348688942 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2382917850 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2745784522 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2951299169 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2971056747 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W2992168714 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W3014436549 @default.
• W2314477673 hasRelatedWork W3133732957 @default.
• W2314477673 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2314477673 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2314477673 magId "2314477673" @default.
• W2314477673 workType "article" @default.