FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2315441781> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2315441781 endingPage "e1685" @default.
• W2315441781 startingPage "e1685" @default.
• W2315441781 abstract "Impacted third molars are frequently encountered in clinical work. Surgical removal of impacted third molars is often required to prevent clinical symptoms. Traditional rotary cutting instruments are potentially injurious, and piezosurgery, as a new osteotomy technique, has been introduced in oral and maxillofacial surgery. No consistent conclusion has been reached regarding whether this new technique is associated with fewer or less severe postoperative sequelae after third molar extraction.The aim of this study was to compare piezosurgery with rotary osteotomy techniques, with regard to surgery time and the severity of postoperative sequelae, including pain, swelling, and trismus.We conducted a systematic literature search in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar.The eligibility criteria of this study included the following: the patients were clearly diagnosed as having impacted mandibular third molars; the patients underwent piezosurgery osteotomy, and in the control group rotary osteotomy techniques, for removing impacted third molars; the outcomes of interest include surgery time, trismus, swelling or pain; the studies are randomized controlled trials.We used random-effects models to calculate the difference in the outcomes, and the corresponding 95% confidence interval. We calculated the weighted mean difference if the trials used the same measurement, and a standardized mean difference if otherwise.A total of seven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. Compared with rotary osteotomy, patients undergoing piezosurgery experienced longer surgery time (mean difference 4.13 minutes, 95% confidence interval 2.75-5.52, P < 0.0001). Patients receiving the piezoelectric technique had less swelling at postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7 (all Ps ≤0.023). Additionally, there was a trend of less postoperative pain and trismus in the piezosurgery groups.The number of included randomized controlled trials and the sample size of each trial were relatively small, double blinding was not possible, and cost analysis was unavailable due to a lack of data.Our meta-analysis indicates that although patients undergoing piezosurgery experienced longer surgery time, they had less postoperative swelling, indicating that piezosurgery is a promising alternative technique for extraction of impacted third molars." @default.
• W2315441781 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2315441781 creator A5014715082 @default.
• W2315441781 creator A5020819058 @default.
• W2315441781 creator A5031973253 @default.
• W2315441781 creator A5053402281 @default.
• W2315441781 creator A5066344416 @default.
• W2315441781 creator A5067594179 @default.
• W2315441781 date "2015-10-01" @default.
• W2315441781 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W2315441781 title "Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction" @default.
• W2315441781 cites W1709885097 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W196770844 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W1970595241 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W1971570738 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W1985204428 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2000961396 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2001821607 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2012351267 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2026910843 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2029498199 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2033688532 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2034200659 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2039425961 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2049989018 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2064756559 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2068975212 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2074593393 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2097153205 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2098696168 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2111048668 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2148825009 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2156098321 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2182250472 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2209760454 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2400417361 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2413955101 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W2416544850 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W246286872 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W38372573 @default.
• W2315441781 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W2315441781 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000001685" @default.
• W2315441781 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4616780" @default.
• W2315441781 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26469902" @default.
• W2315441781 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2315441781 type Work @default.
• W2315441781 sameAs 2315441781 @default.
• W2315441781 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812016 @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812017 @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812018 @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812019 @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812020 @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812021 @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812022 @default.
• W2315441781 countsByYear W23154417812023 @default.
• W2315441781 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2315441781 hasAuthorship W2315441781A5014715082 @default.
• W2315441781 hasAuthorship W2315441781A5020819058 @default.
• W2315441781 hasAuthorship W2315441781A5031973253 @default.
• W2315441781 hasAuthorship W2315441781A5053402281 @default.
• W2315441781 hasAuthorship W2315441781A5066344416 @default.
• W2315441781 hasAuthorship W2315441781A5067594179 @default.
• W2315441781 hasBestOaLocation W23154417811 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C2776389721 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C2778838824 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C126322002 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C141071460 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C168563851 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C199343813 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C202271784 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C2776389721 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C2776478404 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C2778838824 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C29694066 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C44249647 @default.
• W2315441781 hasConceptScore W2315441781C71924100 @default.
• W2315441781 hasIssue "41" @default.
• W2315441781 hasLocation W23154417811 @default.
• W2315441781 hasLocation W23154417812 @default.
• W2315441781 hasLocation W23154417813 @default.
• W2315441781 hasLocation W23154417814 @default.
• W2315441781 hasLocation W23154417815 @default.
• W2315441781 hasOpenAccess W2315441781 @default.
• W2315441781 hasPrimaryLocation W23154417811 @default.
• W2315441781 hasRelatedWork W1970313476 @default.
• W2315441781 hasRelatedWork W1985604729 @default.
• W2315441781 hasRelatedWork W202161368 @default.
• W2315441781 hasRelatedWork W2170030662 @default.

• next