FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2315702995> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2315702995 endingPage "352" @default.
• W2315702995 startingPage "351" @default.
• W2315702995 abstract "Background: Composite filling materials have been increasingly used for the restoration of posterior teeth in recent years as a tooth coloured alternative to amalgam. As with any filling material composites have a finite life-span. Traditionally, replacement was the ideal approach to treat defective composite restorations, however, repairing composites offers an alternative more conservative approach where restorations are partly still serviceable. Repairing the restoration has the potential of taking less time and may sometimes be performed without the use of local anaesthesia hence it may be less distressing for a patient when compared with replacement. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of replacement (with resin composite) versus repair (with resin composite) in the management of defective resin composite dental restorations in permanent molar and premolar teeth. Search strategy: For the identification of studies relevant to this review we searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register (to 23rd September 2009); CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 4); MEDLINE (1950 to 23rd September 2009); EMBASE (1980 to 23rd September 2009); ISI Web of Science (SCIE, SSCI) (1981 to 22nd December 2009); ISI Web of Science Conference Proceedings (1990 to 22nd December 2009); BIOSIS (1985 to 22nd December 2009); and OpenSIGLE (1980 to 2005). Researchers, experts and organizations known to be involved in this field were contacted in order to trace unpublished or ongoing studies. There were no language limitations. Selection criteria: Trials were selected if they met the following criteria: randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trial, involving replacement and repair of resin composite restorations. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed titles and abstracts for each article identified by the searches in order to decide whether the article was likely to be relevant. Full papers were obtained for relevant articles and both review authors studied these. The Cochrane Collaboration statistical guidelines were to be followed for data synthesis. Main results: The search strategy retrieved 279 potentially eligible studies, after de-duplication and examination of the titles and abstracts all but four studies were deemed irrelevant. After further analysis of the full texts of the four studies identified, none of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria and all were excluded from this review. Authors’ conclusions: There are no published randomised controlled clinical trials relevant to this review question. There is therefore a need for methodologically sound randomised controlled clinical trials that are reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement (http://www.consort-statement.org/). Further research also needs to explore qualitatively the views of patients on repairing versus replacement and investigate themes around pain, anxiety and distress, time and costs." @default.
• W2315702995 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2315702995 creator A5003754560 @default.
• W2315702995 creator A5004413045 @default.
• W2315702995 creator A5028477336 @default.
• W2315702995 creator A5031943476 @default.
• W2315702995 creator A5077214779 @default.
• W2315702995 creator A5082679187 @default.
• W2315702995 creator A5089966807 @default.
• W2315702995 date "2010-09-01" @default.
• W2315702995 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2315702995 title "Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite" @default.
• W2315702995 cites W2015873852 @default.
• W2315702995 cites W2064788953 @default.
• W2315702995 cites W2069426592 @default.
• W2315702995 cites W2082218908 @default.
• W2315702995 cites W2109495812 @default.
• W2315702995 cites W2131693856 @default.
• W2315702995 cites W2137150203 @default.
• W2315702995 cites W27900330 @default.
• W2315702995 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01249.x" @default.
• W2315702995 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2315702995 type Work @default.
• W2315702995 sameAs 2315702995 @default.
• W2315702995 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2315702995 countsByYear W23157029952015 @default.
• W2315702995 countsByYear W23157029952017 @default.
• W2315702995 countsByYear W23157029952019 @default.
• W2315702995 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2315702995 hasAuthorship W2315702995A5003754560 @default.
• W2315702995 hasAuthorship W2315702995A5004413045 @default.
• W2315702995 hasAuthorship W2315702995A5028477336 @default.
• W2315702995 hasAuthorship W2315702995A5031943476 @default.
• W2315702995 hasAuthorship W2315702995A5077214779 @default.
• W2315702995 hasAuthorship W2315702995A5082679187 @default.
• W2315702995 hasAuthorship W2315702995A5089966807 @default.
• W2315702995 hasBestOaLocation W23157029951 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C130907195 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C147789679 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C17525397 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C2780641865 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C2781431781 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C3019280483 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C51795115 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C104779481 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C130907195 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C141071460 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C147789679 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C159985019 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C168563851 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C17525397 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C17744445 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C185592680 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C192562407 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C199343813 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C199539241 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C202271784 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C2776478404 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C2779473830 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C2780641865 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C2781431781 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C3019280483 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C51795115 @default.
• W2315702995 hasConceptScore W2315702995C71924100 @default.
• W2315702995 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2315702995 hasLocation W23157029951 @default.
• W2315702995 hasOpenAccess W2315702995 @default.
• W2315702995 hasPrimaryLocation W23157029951 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W1884522976 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W189992772 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2006924008 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2050459293 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2060136995 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2112149326 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2390685863 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2412797292 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2414196490 @default.
• W2315702995 hasRelatedWork W2519476213 @default.
• W2315702995 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W2315702995 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2315702995 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2315702995 magId "2315702995" @default.
• W2315702995 workType "article" @default.