FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2316365002> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2316365002 endingPage "931" @default.
• W2316365002 startingPage "925" @default.
• W2316365002 abstract "BACKGROUND: Rectal endometriosis can cause debilitating symptoms. Rectal resection in this setting has been shown to improve symptoms; however, there remain some reservations about this intervention because of the risk of complications such as anastomotic leak and rectovaginal fistula. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to review our experience with rectal resection in patients with rectal endometriosis. DATA SOURCES: Hospital records and prospectively maintained electronic databases of an endogynecologist and colorectal surgeon were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent rectal resection for endometriosis from 2001 to 2010. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent either disc or segmental resection of the rectum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes of interest were operative complications and recurrence requiring surgical reintervention. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients underwent 92 resections for endometriosis. Sixty-five (71%) were disc resections, 25 (27%) were segmental resections, and 1 patient underwent both disc and segmental resections. Eighty-one (88%) procedures were completed laparoscopically. Patients requiring segmental resection had more extensive disease, and this was associated with open conversion (p ≤ 0.0001). Average duration of procedure was 209 minutes. Three patients (3%) required defunctioning ileostomies. Intramural endometriosis was confirmed in 96.7% of specimens. Complications occurred in 13 patients (15%); 4 were minor. Three patients had small pelvic collections treated with antibiotics, 5 patients required transfusion for bleeding (3 intraoperative, 2 anastomotic bleeds that settled conservatively), and 1 patient sustained ureteric injury that was reimplanted with no sequelae. None had anastomotic leak or rectovaginal fistula. Ten patients (11%) required reintervention for recurrent symptoms. Of these, 8 (8.8%) patients were found to have recurrent endometriosis. No correlation could be found between involved margins on pathology and need for redo surgery. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectal resection for deeply infiltrative endometriosis is feasible and safe, and it provides durable symptom control with acceptable recurrence rates." @default.
• W2316365002 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2316365002 creator A5025931700 @default.
• W2316365002 creator A5060274786 @default.
• W2316365002 creator A5064209866 @default.
• W2316365002 creator A5065114566 @default.
• W2316365002 date "2012-09-01" @default.
• W2316365002 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2316365002 title "Management of Deeply Infiltrating Endometriosis Involving the Rectum" @default.
• W2316365002 cites W1966376095 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W1968179713 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W1973638124 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W1974504863 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W1997788043 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2001368341 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2003711731 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2027244513 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2028228566 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2031634048 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2033846781 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2034406012 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2061958315 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2066166226 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2076216210 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2086717603 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2090473586 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2093673714 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2095516592 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2115780546 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2129021024 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2132577372 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2144173184 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2157215492 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2162317615 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W2162901477 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W289019410 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W4252948720 @default.
• W2316365002 cites W4366445915 @default.
• W2316365002 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0b013e31825f3092" @default.
• W2316365002 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23044684" @default.
• W2316365002 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2316365002 type Work @default.
• W2316365002 sameAs 2316365002 @default.
• W2316365002 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022012 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022013 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022014 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022015 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022016 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022017 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022018 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022019 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022020 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022021 @default.
• W2316365002 countsByYear W23163650022022 @default.
• W2316365002 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2316365002 hasAuthorship W2316365002A5025931700 @default.
• W2316365002 hasAuthorship W2316365002A5060274786 @default.
• W2316365002 hasAuthorship W2316365002A5064209866 @default.
• W2316365002 hasAuthorship W2316365002A5065114566 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C159110652 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C2776341189 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C2777589833 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C2778773085 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C2779522080 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C2779686005 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C2781074409 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C126322002 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C141071460 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C159110652 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C167135981 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C2776341189 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C2777589833 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C2778773085 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C2779522080 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C2779686005 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C2780120127 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C2781074409 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C523026621 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C71924100 @default.
• W2316365002 hasConceptScore W2316365002C8443397 @default.
• W2316365002 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2316365002 hasLocation W23163650021 @default.
• W2316365002 hasLocation W23163650022 @default.
• W2316365002 hasOpenAccess W2316365002 @default.
• W2316365002 hasPrimaryLocation W23163650021 @default.
• W2316365002 hasRelatedWork W1988645453 @default.
• W2316365002 hasRelatedWork W2003635697 @default.
• W2316365002 hasRelatedWork W2180694574 @default.
• W2316365002 hasRelatedWork W2414729050 @default.

• next