FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2316441710> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2316441710 endingPage "169" @default.
• W2316441710 startingPage "169" @default.
• W2316441710 abstract "The pollination biology of Combretum farinosum, a hummingbird-pollinated, outcrossing liana of the dry forest in Costa Rica, was investigated in order to determine the evolutionary interactions between nectar rewards and pollinator foraging behavior. Plants generally produced many flowers, arranged in dense inflorescences which were highly synchronized in development, and with large nectar output per flower. Inflorescences change color from green on the first day, to greenorange (day 2), orange (day 3), and red (days 4 and 5). Only green, first-day inflorescences secrete nectar, and these were visited preferentially by all hummingbirds. Red inflorescences contained little nectar, were rarely visited (2% of all visits), and probably serve as flags to attract pollinators. The hummingbirds Chlorostilbon canivetii and Archilochus colubris foraged as transients, moving primarily between plants, while Amazilia saucerottei and A. rutila foraged as tenants at single plants and periodically defended small sections of large plants. The visitation rate per inflorescence increased with effective plant size (= number of nectar-producing inflorescences) for tenants, but not transients. Mean seed set per inflorescence decreased with effective plant size, but seed production per plant increased. Seed set was not limited by hummingbird visitation rate per se, as expected seed set per inflorescence (calculated from visitation rate and the number of flowers probed per visit) increased with plant size. Despite the higher visitation rate of tenants to large plants, seed set per infloresconce did not increase due to the low outcrossing potential of tenants as compared to transients, and the occasional removal of transients by territorial tenants. I suggest that the large nectar production of Combretum has evolved to satiate potentially territorial species and reduce the advantages of patch defense-increasing the number of outcrossing visits per plant. This pollinator-satiation strategy is an evolutionarv parallel of that found in seed-dispersal systems; in both cases foraging behavior is altered through resource abundance. PLANT REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS result fronm selection operating on life history and breeding system in the context of maximizing reproductive success. The evolutionary advantages of sex (Maynard Smith 1971, 1978; Williams 1975) have effected an astonishing diversity of floral characters designed to manipulate the pattern and process of pollen movement. With the exception of autogamy, all forms of sexual reproduction in angiosperms require the intraspecific movement of pollen to a receptive stigma via some external agent. When animal vectors perform this transfer a reward is required, except in cases of dupery in which plants trap pollinators (Proctor and Yeo 1973) or induce pseudocopulation (Kullenberg 1961). The strategies and tactics utilized by plants in the evolutionary development of their floral attractiveness to pollinators are largely functions of the pollinators' nutritional and energetic demands (Heinrich and Raven 1972, Baker and Baker 1975). The level of reward offered can markedly affect pollinator movement patterns and, as a result, plant reproductive success (Willson and Rathcke 1974, Frankie et al. 1976, Carpenter 1976). Thus, plants will evolutionarily manipulate the spatial distribution, quantity, and quality of reward to optimize pollinator movement (Janzen 1977). This can be achieved by varying floral distribution on an individual and by regulating reward level through variations in the 1) numbers of flowers/plant, 2 ) nectar volume/flower, 3) nectar composition, and 4) the rate and duration of nectar flow. The extent to which resource abundance and distribution affect reproductive success is highly dependent on breeding system, with self-incompatible species most affected by sedentary pollin-" @default.
• W2316441710 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2316441710 creator A5069787458 @default.
• W2316441710 date "1980-09-01" @default.
• W2316441710 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2316441710 title "Floral Ecology and Hummingbird Pollination of Combretum farinosum in Costa Rica" @default.
• W2316441710 cites W1971621848 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W1975244667 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W1976898305 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W1988011643 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W1990425857 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W1995718763 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2000871817 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2001891226 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2012621037 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2012690501 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2014863347 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2026214848 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2026412915 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2027444949 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2038368437 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2052710730 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2059041259 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2073152080 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2092035563 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2093289928 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2094523549 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2106029969 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2113065784 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2171299208 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2312990301 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2313996670 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2318127223 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2327911850 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2333873677 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2334508873 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W2944891254 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W3212579148 @default.
• W2316441710 cites W659228288 @default.
• W2316441710 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/2387968" @default.
• W2316441710 hasPublicationYear "1980" @default.
• W2316441710 type Work @default.
• W2316441710 sameAs 2316441710 @default.
• W2316441710 citedByCount "83" @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102012 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102014 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102015 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102016 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102017 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102018 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102019 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102021 @default.
• W2316441710 countsByYear W23164417102022 @default.
• W2316441710 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2316441710 hasAuthorship W2316441710A5069787458 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConcept C168197293 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConcept C2780610420 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConcept C2780618852 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConceptScore W2316441710C168197293 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConceptScore W2316441710C18903297 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConceptScore W2316441710C205649164 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConceptScore W2316441710C2780610420 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConceptScore W2316441710C2780618852 @default.
• W2316441710 hasConceptScore W2316441710C86803240 @default.
• W2316441710 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2316441710 hasLocation W23164417101 @default.
• W2316441710 hasOpenAccess W2316441710 @default.
• W2316441710 hasPrimaryLocation W23164417101 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W2005973363 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W2012907084 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W2025147726 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W2121464126 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W2297786205 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W2605262889 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W2903928877 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W4213062028 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W4221066800 @default.
• W2316441710 hasRelatedWork W4294921392 @default.
• W2316441710 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W2316441710 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2316441710 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2316441710 magId "2316441710" @default.
• W2316441710 workType "article" @default.