Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W231656178> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- W231656178 endingPage "292" @default.
- W231656178 startingPage "292" @default.
- W231656178 abstract "Some years ago, Gila Hanna offered the very insightful and useful distinction between mathematical proofs that prove and those that also explain (Hanna, 1989). Proofs that explain not only state the deductive logic that justifies their mathematical claims, they lay bare the mechanisms and structures that underlie that logic, making content and logic more properly align. In so doing, they more effectively teach mathematics than do proofs that only prove. I wish to argue for a related perspective on the nature and importance of reviews of submissions to JRME.' As reviewers, we can choose between preparing reviews that primarily evaluate and reviews that also teach, and we should try-whenever submissions call for it-to submit reviews that teach. I see this proposal as being quite consistent with Ed Silver's recent distinction between the evaluative and functions of reviews (Silver, 2003). But writing reviews that teach may be a more demanding standard than preparing educative reviews. At least, choosing the right teaching stance can provide a useful context for preparing reviews. My thesis is that all who review JRME submissions should be willing-when needed-to conceptualize their task as one of mentoring authors. Taking this perspective shifts the focus in reviewing from evaluation to teaching. Evaluation is certainly a necessary dimension, as summary recommendations (e.g., accept, reject, reject but invite revision) are required for the editor to make and support final judgments about publication. But as proofs that explain do not stop at flawless logic, reviews that teach do not stop at stating and justifying a reviewer's recommendation. Instead, reviews that teach-and do so sensitively-clearly articulate the main reasons why authors' current arguments are inadequate and also present strategies they might pursue in correcting those deficiencies. Before I develop this proposal a bit further, I want to be clear. I do not think that JRME's review process is deficient; it is just the opposite. Because there is" @default.
- W231656178 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W231656178 creator A5053166159 @default.
- W231656178 date "2004-07-01" @default.
- W231656178 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W231656178 title "Reviews That Teach" @default.
- W231656178 cites W2005626691 @default.
- W231656178 cites W2043030805 @default.
- W231656178 cites W3210503713 @default.
- W231656178 cites W3215332786 @default.
- W231656178 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/30034811" @default.
- W231656178 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W231656178 type Work @default.
- W231656178 sameAs 231656178 @default.
- W231656178 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W231656178 countsByYear W2316561782015 @default.
- W231656178 countsByYear W2316561782022 @default.
- W231656178 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W231656178 hasAuthorship W231656178A5053166159 @default.
- W231656178 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
- W231656178 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W231656178 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W231656178 hasConceptScore W231656178C145420912 @default.
- W231656178 hasConceptScore W231656178C15744967 @default.
- W231656178 hasConceptScore W231656178C19417346 @default.
- W231656178 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W231656178 hasLocation W2316561781 @default.
- W231656178 hasOpenAccess W231656178 @default.
- W231656178 hasPrimaryLocation W2316561781 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W1710126152 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W2053487507 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W2077865380 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W2134894512 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W2765597752 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W2931662336 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W3049356719 @default.
- W231656178 hasRelatedWork W3347015 @default.
- W231656178 hasVolume "35" @default.
- W231656178 isParatext "false" @default.
- W231656178 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W231656178 magId "231656178" @default.
- W231656178 workType "article" @default.