FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2316571012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2316571012 endingPage "140" @default.
• W2316571012 startingPage "100" @default.
• W2316571012 abstract "Designing effective pedagogical tasks has been of critical interest among second‐language (L2) researchers and teachers. Accordingly, several claims about how to classify pedagogic task characteristics in terms of their effectiveness in L2 learning have been made. One such example is the involvement load hypothesis ( Hulstijn & Laufer, 2001 ), which claims that learning new words during vocabulary‐focused tasks is dependent on the degree of cognitive processing required of an L2 learner by a given task. Building upon Hulstijn and Laufer's (2001) original research, which partially supported the hypothesis, the present study examined the hypothesis by exploring the interaction between task‐induced involvement and learners’ L2 proficiency on the initial learning and retention of target words. The study consisted of two experiments that were carried out with English‐as‐a‐second‐language learners at two different proficiency levels (i.e., matriculated undergraduate students vs. students in an Intensive English Program). Experiment 1 tested the hypothesis with three tasks imposing different levels of task‐induced involvement ( n = 64), whereas Experiment 2 included two tasks hypothesized to represent the same task‐induced involvement ( n = 20). In line with the predictions of the involvement load hypothesis, the findings of Experiment 1 indicated that a higher level of learner involvement during task performance promoted more effective initial learning and retention of target words. Additionally, Experiment 2 showed that different tasks with the same involvement load resulted in a similar amount of vocabulary learning. These results were generally consistent across different proficiency levels, suggesting no interaction effect between task‐induced involvement and L2 proficiency on vocabulary learning. The findings of the present study further the involvement load hypothesis by providing insights into how some individual differences—in this case L2 proficiency and cognitive involvement—might be more/less important to consider when implementing pedagogic tasks. Interestingly, the results indicated that as long as L2 learners’ cognitive and language abilities allow them to complete vocabulary tasks in a given time, a deeper level of processing of the new words, especially the evaluation component of task‐induced involvement during tasks, facilitates L2 vocabulary learning. Furthermore, the findings of Experiment 2 also provide insightful pedagogical implications demonstrating that it is possible to design different types of vocabulary tasks inducing similar amounts of involvement loads and that they can be equally beneficial for vocabulary learning. In task‐based language teaching, designing tasks involves a complex series of considerations such as understanding who the target learners are and what cognitive processes each task requires. The experiments presented in this article reexamined the involvement load hypothesis and utilized tasks designed with such considerations in mind in order to explore the effectiveness of various vocabulary learning tasks." @default.
• W2316571012 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2316571012 creator A5001849585 @default.
• W2316571012 date "2011-05-20" @default.
• W2316571012 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2316571012 title "The Role of Task-Induced Involvement and Learner Proficiency in L2 Vocabulary Acquisition" @default.
• W2316571012 cites W1508840472 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W1575716360 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W1657454031 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W1990451873 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W1996983305 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2018920219 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2020858146 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W203668661 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2037023969 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2045385178 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2063765880 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2082070244 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2103403153 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2106564889 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2112921747 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2114282361 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2128662234 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2130493104 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2153932817 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2154983645 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2160482209 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2161742772 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2163511437 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2163703049 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W2166562747 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W4252583063 @default.
• W2316571012 cites W773929776 @default.
• W2316571012 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00644.x" @default.
• W2316571012 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2316571012 type Work @default.
• W2316571012 sameAs 2316571012 @default.
• W2316571012 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122012 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122013 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122014 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122015 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122016 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122017 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122018 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122019 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122020 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122021 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122022 @default.
• W2316571012 countsByYear W23165710122023 @default.
• W2316571012 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2316571012 hasAuthorship W2316571012A5001849585 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C2777601683 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C2778883600 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C2991789358 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C138885662 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C145420912 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C15744967 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C162324750 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C169760540 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C169900460 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C180747234 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C187736073 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C2777601683 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C2778883600 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C2780451532 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C2991789358 @default.
• W2316571012 hasConceptScore W2316571012C41895202 @default.
• W2316571012 hasIssue "s1" @default.
• W2316571012 hasLocation W23165710121 @default.
• W2316571012 hasOpenAccess W2316571012 @default.
• W2316571012 hasPrimaryLocation W23165710121 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W1920293721 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W1981917736 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W1996983305 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W2012113433 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W2026621066 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W2042130734 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W2139977042 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W2364261441 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W3217175868 @default.
• W2316571012 hasRelatedWork W2189399625 @default.
• W2316571012 hasVolume "61" @default.
• W2316571012 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2316571012 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2316571012 magId "2316571012" @default.
• W2316571012 workType "article" @default.