Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2316693577> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W2316693577 endingPage "E592" @default.
- W2316693577 startingPage "E592" @default.
- W2316693577 abstract "To the Editor: Now that I am semiretired and no longer performing operative neurosurgery, I have been disappointed to find that some of my younger colleagues decline to perform cervical fusions for patients whom I refer to them if those patients have only neck pain and do not have severe radicular symptoms and/or neurological deficit. I am told that this is because of an impression of a universally poor outcome, although perhaps it is also in part a reaction to some of the excessive surgical zeal for doing cervical fusions that we all encounter in the community. My own recollection, based on more than 40 years of performing cervical spine surgery, has not been so pessimistic, and I believe that it is a disservice to my patients for them not to be able to undergo potentially quite beneficial fusion surgery. Surgery for painful joints elsewhere in the body is certainly widely practiced and accepted, with large numbers of artificial hips, knees, and so on being used to treat painful joints as our population ages. Because the cervical disc is another joint that can be locally damaged, producing arthralgic pain, I fail to see the logic of not operating on a painful cervical disc when indicated. To reinforce my memory, I did a quick chart review of my own last 10 patients operated on for arthralgic cervicalgia during the years 1995 to 2002. Like most spinal neurosurgeons, the majority of the cervical operations that I performed were for disc ruptures with radiculitis, cervical fractures, spondylotic myelopathy, tumors, and other conditions. However, I did retrieve the records for 10 patients on whom I had operated for neck pain as their principal symptom. All these patients had severe 1- or 2-level cervical disc degeneration, and none had associated neurological deficits. All were incapacitated by intolerable pain despite aggressive and often prolonged therapy, including anti-inflammatory drugs, bracing, exercises, and often intradiscal steroid injections. There were 5 men and 5 women, 8 with single-level disease and 2 with adjacent 2-level disease. Their ages were younger than those of typical patients with degenerative spondylopathy (mean age 45.5 years, range 36-64 years), most having a history of remote neck injury of limited severity. All underwent anterior cervical fusion, 4 with a Cloward technique and 6 with instrumentation. Follow-up varied from 2 to 64 months (mean 8 months). Four patients reported excellent results (fully functional without medication), 3 good results (functional but requiring medication), and 2 fair results (decreased pain intensity but functionally limited), and only 1 reported a poor result (no pain relief). Undoubtedly the results that can be achieved with cervical fusion for cervicalgia will be determined chiefly by patient selection because most neurosurgeons and orthopedists are likely to be technically adept at such surgery. My patients were selected after I got to know them, all had severe and focal degenerative disc disease on imaging, and all had intolerable neck pain despite vigorous and varied alternative therapy. It should not be overly difficult for neurosurgeons to select patients likely to benefit from fusion surgery for cervicalgia, just as they select appropriate patients for surgery for other disorders. It seems to me that “the myth of poor outcome from fusion surgery for cervicalgia” is likely to become self-fulfilling if proper patient selection is not carried out, but these patients do exist, many suffer greatly, and many of them can benefit greatly from surgery to become grateful patients. Harold A. Wilkinson Boston, Massachusetts" @default.
- W2316693577 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2316693577 creator A5020389889 @default.
- W2316693577 date "2011-02-01" @default.
- W2316693577 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2316693577 title "Should Cervical Fusions Ever Be Done for Cervicalgia Alone?" @default.
- W2316693577 doi "https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0b013e31820208bf" @default.
- W2316693577 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21135723" @default.
- W2316693577 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W2316693577 type Work @default.
- W2316693577 sameAs 2316693577 @default.
- W2316693577 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2316693577 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2316693577 hasAuthorship W2316693577A5020389889 @default.
- W2316693577 hasBestOaLocation W23166935771 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2777044684 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2777604421 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2779785605 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2779978343 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2781038967 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2781298600 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2781430139 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C118552586 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C141071460 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C142724271 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C204787440 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2777044684 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2777604421 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2779785605 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2779978343 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2780775167 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2781038967 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2781298600 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2781430139 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C2985379065 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C44575665 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C61434518 @default.
- W2316693577 hasConceptScore W2316693577C71924100 @default.
- W2316693577 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2316693577 hasLocation W23166935771 @default.
- W2316693577 hasLocation W23166935772 @default.
- W2316693577 hasOpenAccess W2316693577 @default.
- W2316693577 hasPrimaryLocation W23166935771 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W1973643632 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W2024282325 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W2046438897 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W2084770513 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W2143657078 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W2770906484 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W4226020711 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W4237245117 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W4309514340 @default.
- W2316693577 hasRelatedWork W4385404120 @default.
- W2316693577 hasVolume "68" @default.
- W2316693577 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2316693577 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2316693577 magId "2316693577" @default.
- W2316693577 workType "article" @default.