Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2317294783> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2317294783 endingPage "718" @default.
- W2317294783 startingPage "707" @default.
- W2317294783 abstract "With the publication of the updated US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) communication in 2011 on the use of transvaginal placement of mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) it is appropriate to now review recent studies of good quality on POP to assess the safety and effectiveness of treatment options and determine their place in management.A systematic search for studies on the conservative and surgical management of POP published in the English literature between January 2002 and October 2012 was performed. Studies included were review articles, randomized controlled trials, prospective and relevant retrospective studies as well as conference abstracts. Selected articles were appraised by the authors regarding clinical relevance.Prospective comparative studies show that vaginal pessaries constitute an effective and safe treatment for POP and should be offered as first treatment of choice in women with symptomatic POP. However, a pessary will have to be used for the patient's lifetime. Abdominal sacral colpopexy is effective in treating apical prolapse with an acceptable benefit-risk ratio. This procedure should be balanced against the low but non-negligible risk of serious complications. The results of native tissue vaginal POP repair are better than previously thought with high patient satisfaction and acceptable reoperation rates. The insertion of mesh at the time of anterior vaginal wall repair reduces the awareness of prolapse as well as the risk of recurrent anterior prolapse. There is no difference in anatomic and subjective outcome when native tissue vaginal repairs are compared with multicompartment vaginal mesh. Mesh exposure is still a significant problem requiring surgical excision in approximately ≥ 10 % of cases. The ideal mesh has not yet been found necessitating more basic research into mesh properties and host response. Several studies indicate that greater surgical experience is correlated with fewer mesh complications. In women with uterovaginal prolapse uterine preservation is a feasible option which women should be offered. Randomized studies with long-term follow-up are advisable to establish the place of uterine preservation in POP surgery.Over the last decade treatment of POP has been dominated by the use of mesh. Conservative treatment is the first option in women with POP. Surgical repair with or without mesh generally results in good short-term objective and functional outcomes. However, basic research into mesh properties with host response and comparative studies with long-term follow-up are urgently needed." @default.
- W2317294783 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2317294783 creator A5020515864 @default.
- W2317294783 creator A5027291919 @default.
- W2317294783 date "2013-01-10" @default.
- W2317294783 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2317294783 title "Where to for pelvic organ prolapse treatment after the FDA pronouncements?" @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1484272970 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1493923267 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1512494205 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1609232880 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1911075250 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1963660569 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1966175052 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1966643367 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1967057830 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1969028944 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1970191328 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1971405540 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1971815773 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1975244392 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1977276811 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1978913233 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1980453087 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1980470456 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1987221763 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1988359429 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1995232346 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1996641385 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W1998918881 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2000124109 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2009950682 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2010147786 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2015635389 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2016343516 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2016769800 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2017253396 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2019046406 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2020075249 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2020255488 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2020328163 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2024422045 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2025660903 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2036969130 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2038225835 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2038380246 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2038461503 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2043942260 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2044050544 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2050405310 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2051986570 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2052622255 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2054247944 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2055839962 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2058157151 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2063862388 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2071491884 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2073129216 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2076895828 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2082978597 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2086943545 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2091903888 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2092370043 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2093185571 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2096342393 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2099716058 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2104043444 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2116357936 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2116679770 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2136367469 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2141315776 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2141373581 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2144390171 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2149815829 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2152198468 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2156587161 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2158623340 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2328973603 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W2949370727 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W3041820159 @default.
- W2317294783 cites W4231501274 @default.
- W2317294783 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-2025-3" @default.
- W2317294783 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23306770" @default.
- W2317294783 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2317294783 type Work @default.
- W2317294783 sameAs 2317294783 @default.
- W2317294783 citedByCount "46" @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832013 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832014 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832015 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832016 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832017 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832018 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832019 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832020 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832021 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832022 @default.
- W2317294783 countsByYear W23172947832023 @default.