FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2317891010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2317891010 endingPage "693" @default.
• W2317891010 startingPage "693" @default.
• W2317891010 abstract "ANY AMERICAN CRITICS have begun to view history as a way out of the impasses of epistemology. They point out that theoretical reflection has not been able to devise clear, indisputable procedures for producing correct interpretations. Conflict still rages about such basic issues as whether literary works have an autonomous existence or depend radically in their very meaning and structure on how we construe them. These undecidable questions can be bypassed if not resolved, it is thought, by turning to history. The argument for replacing epistemological reflection with historical analysis takes several forms. If, for example, a theoretical issue like that of the relation between a writer's intention and the meaning of his work cannot be conclusively settled, then we can at least explain how this dilemma arose by analyzing the development of the concept of the author.' Perhaps studying the history of a problem will show us how to avoid traps others have fallen into. Or, if the inability of epistemology to legislate hermeneutic correctness means that different communities can regard different kinds of argumentation as persuasive, then perhaps we should study the various rhetorical practices in which interpreters have engaged instead of attempting to define absolutely what a right reading must look like. This maneuver would turn epistemology into a historical issue by asking how ways of seeing are institutionalized in discursive practices.2 Or perhaps we should abandon theoretical reflection altogether and devote ourselves to practical research in the conviction that some problems can be solved concretely, case by case, even if they resist a global, philosophical attack.3 For all of these arguments, historical study seems to offer a means of avoiding irreconcilable epistemological disputes. This hope, however, is mistaken. does not provide a neutral ground outside the theory of knowledge. History itself is a hermeneutic construct, and all the quarrels about validity in interpretation return in the question of how to constitute it. Instead of escaping the epistemological issues which have vexed contemporary literary theory, the move to history is destined to repeat them. Epistemology is necessarily implicated in history in a number of ways. Disinterest-" @default.
• W2317891010 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2317891010 creator A5046139859 @default.
• W2317891010 date "1988-01-01" @default.
• W2317891010 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2317891010 title "History and Epistemology: The Example of The Turn of the Screw" @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2007249831 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2017155489 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2062358789 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2071182327 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2071575840 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2101949838 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2322547167 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2322555838 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2795761305 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2795938027 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2796102188 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2799573282 @default.
• W2317891010 cites W2799963947 @default.
• W2317891010 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/469096" @default.
• W2317891010 hasPublicationYear "1988" @default.
• W2317891010 type Work @default.
• W2317891010 sameAs 2317891010 @default.
• W2317891010 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2317891010 countsByYear W23178910102018 @default.
• W2317891010 countsByYear W23178910102020 @default.
• W2317891010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2317891010 hasAuthorship W2317891010A5046139859 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConcept C2779960602 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConcept C85641259 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConceptScore W2317891010C111472728 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConceptScore W2317891010C138885662 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConceptScore W2317891010C185592680 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConceptScore W2317891010C2779960602 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConceptScore W2317891010C55493867 @default.
• W2317891010 hasConceptScore W2317891010C85641259 @default.
• W2317891010 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2317891010 hasLocation W23178910101 @default.
• W2317891010 hasOpenAccess W2317891010 @default.
• W2317891010 hasPrimaryLocation W23178910101 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W194874970 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W1987346758 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2059300995 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2070051673 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2070720935 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2108611755 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2119673953 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2755678161 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2900127165 @default.
• W2317891010 hasRelatedWork W2970383086 @default.
• W2317891010 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2317891010 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2317891010 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2317891010 magId "2317891010" @default.
• W2317891010 workType "article" @default.