Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2318806192> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W2318806192 endingPage "921" @default.
- W2318806192 startingPage "921" @default.
- W2318806192 abstract "Aerial censuses of large mammals are inaccurate because the observer misses a significant number of animals on the transect. The accuracy deteriorates progressively with increasing width of transect, cruising speed, and altitude. Methods of eliminating bias by refining techniques are discussed and rejected; there seems to be no technical solution. An alternative strategy is to measure the bias and correct the estimates accordingly. A method is suggested for estimating bias during an aerial census, the subsequent analysis returning an unbiased estimate of density. No direct measure of true density is needed and little extra effort is involved over that required for a standard aerial survey. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 38(4):927-933 This paper examines the effect of visibility bias, discusses the means by which the bias arises, and suggests methods by which it might be eliminated from aerial survey estimates of density and population size. Aerial survey is, at best, a rough method of estimating the size of a population. Most efforts at refinement have been aimed at raising the precision of the estimate by combining impeccable survey design, high sampling intensity, intricate stratification, and powerful methods of analysis. This trend can be traced back to Siniff and Skoog's (1964) superb paper on an aerial census of caribou (Rangifer tarandus). Their use of stratified random sampling, with sampling effort allocated proportional to density, contrasted markedly with the crudity of previously reported surveys. Subsequently, Jolly's (1969a) paper on designs and analyses appropriate to aerial survey has encouraged a rigorous and disciplined application of the method. Recent papers following this lead have tended to treat the difficulties of estimating population size from the air largely as constituting a sampling problem, a survey being rated successful or otherwise according to the size of the estimate's standard error. Tacitly, the standard error was treated as a measure of the estimate's accuracy rather than of its repeatability. Underlying the preoccupation with precision there often lurked an implicit assumption that the estimate is free of bias, that the observers counted all animals on each sampled" @default.
- W2318806192 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2318806192 creator A5080338427 @default.
- W2318806192 date "1974-10-01" @default.
- W2318806192 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W2318806192 title "Bias in Aerial Survey" @default.
- W2318806192 cites W1977214830 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2000710969 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2027838950 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2033631513 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2034391208 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2036447878 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2038007050 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2312610983 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2315356739 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2318377862 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2322896520 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2326403187 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2329908445 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2742051407 @default.
- W2318806192 cites W2795822591 @default.
- W2318806192 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3800067" @default.
- W2318806192 hasPublicationYear "1974" @default.
- W2318806192 type Work @default.
- W2318806192 sameAs 2318806192 @default.
- W2318806192 citedByCount "349" @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922012 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922013 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922014 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922015 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922016 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922017 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922018 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922019 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922020 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922021 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922022 @default.
- W2318806192 countsByYear W23188061922023 @default.
- W2318806192 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2318806192 hasAuthorship W2318806192A5080338427 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConcept C176262533 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConcept C3018193623 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConcept C62649853 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConceptScore W2318806192C176262533 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConceptScore W2318806192C205649164 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConceptScore W2318806192C3018193623 @default.
- W2318806192 hasConceptScore W2318806192C62649853 @default.
- W2318806192 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2318806192 hasLocation W23188061921 @default.
- W2318806192 hasOpenAccess W2318806192 @default.
- W2318806192 hasPrimaryLocation W23188061921 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2009049642 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2014456679 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W21097156 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2347352478 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2362961657 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2372510838 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2552247882 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2792120979 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W2987386801 @default.
- W2318806192 hasRelatedWork W1597666750 @default.
- W2318806192 hasVolume "38" @default.
- W2318806192 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2318806192 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2318806192 magId "2318806192" @default.
- W2318806192 workType "article" @default.