FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2319330644> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2319330644 abstract "This study examines when and where residential context and communicative factors help and hurt Asian Americans’ political participation both within and beyond coethnic boundaries. Using multilevel analyses, this paper found that living in ethnically homogeneous residential areas and using ethnic media increase Asian-related political awareness. However, these coethnic features in their communicative structure did not directly bridge Asian communities to the political participation. Instead, coethnic features indirectly galvanize Asian Americans’ political participation, which may spill over to more general domains of political participation. Ethnic minorities’ participation in political processes is essential for a functioning democracy whose constituents consist of a variety of racial and ethnic origins. Recent conceptualization of multicultural democracy suggests ethnic minorities should be engaged in politics both as members of ‘‘large’’ general publics and ‘‘small’’ ethnically bounded publics. The large general publics address issues and concerns that face the whole population in a nation-state. The small publics articulate and advance group interests that could be neglected by the dominant ethnic groups (Jacobs & Tillie, 2004; Marri, 2003). Despite these normative expectations about minority-group participation, ethnic minorities have been reported to be less likely to engage in politics relative to dominant ethnic groups. In addition, studies found that existing theoretical models of political participation have not adequately explained this participation gap between the dominant and minority groups. Existing theories of ethnic minority participation lack consideration of an integrative communication aspect that might either facilitate or hinder ethnic All correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Mihye Seo, Room 331, Social Science Building, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA. E-mail: mseo@albany.edu minorities’ participation in general and ethnic specific arenas. Political communication research has noted that communicative configuration and processes, both interpersonal and mediated, affect people’s political participation (Ball-Rokeach, Kim, & Matei, 2001; McLeod, Scheufele, & Moy, 1999). An ethnic civic community perspective also highlights key roles of communication in ethnic minority groups’ political participation. This perspective suggests that ‘‘communication fabrics’’ (Kim & Ball-Rokeach, 2006, p. 173) of ethnic community—communicative ties among and across ethnic group members and ethnic media use—affect the level of ethnic groups’ political participation and trust (Fennema, 2004; Fennema & Tillie, 1999; Jacobs & Tille, 2004). Concurring with the importance of the communicative approach to explain ethnic minorities’ political participation, this study is particularly interested in the Asian American population. Asian Americans are one of the fastest growing ethnic minorities in the United States, yet their level of political participation is not proportionate to their population growth (Lai, Cho, Kim, & Takeda, 2001; Tam, 1995). Their political participation level, as well as the number of political elites who represent them, is lower than that of other ethnic groups. Studies show that among situations where ethnic minority groups are not highly participatory, in spite of high social economic status (SES), Asian Americans are a typical example of this anomaly (e.g., Cain, Kiewiet, & Uhlaner, 1991; Tam, 1995). Therefore, using a sample of Asian Americans, this study examines the political implications of ethnically homogeneous residential areas and ethnic media reliance: Whether or not the coethnic features of communicative factors encourage or inhibit ethnic minorities’ political participation. Ethnic Minority and Political Participation The task of including ethnic minorities and their voices into the mainstream public sphere is a priority in most democratic societies. Theoretical models developed to explain general political participation have been tested in order to explicate ethnic minorities’ political participation. For instance, the most prominent and widely supported model of political participation is based on SES, which argues that higher status individuals, relative to lower status individuals, are more likely to have better tools enabling them to be politically engaged (Conway, 1991; Gimpel, Lay, & Schuknecht, 2003; Rosenstone & Hansen, 1993). In addition, those with higher SES are believed to obtain greater benefits from political involvement than those of lower status (Campbell, Converse, Miller, & Stokes, 1960; Key, 1964). While the general importance of SES for explaining participation is clear, SES is a less robust predictor for minority group political participation. In fact, the B E Y O N D C O E T H N I C B O U N D A R I E S 339" @default.
• W2319330644 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2319330644 creator A5011868607 @default.
• W2319330644 date "2011-07-29" @default.
• W2319330644 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2319330644 title "Beyond Coethnic Boundaries: Coethnic Residential Context, Communication, and Asian Americans' Political Participation" @default.
• W2319330644 cites W1964586637 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W1972581370 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W1993661650 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2004279575 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2004328395 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2005011082 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2005968416 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2008884873 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2014223857 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2017024689 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2021350837 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2024913622 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2031540131 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2033871526 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2036990101 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2038318916 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2048727984 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2048854689 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2051883074 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2053457254 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2061479494 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2062452954 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2065762765 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2066890996 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2077015662 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2113677323 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2128188170 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2138585937 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2143749847 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2144956506 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2145334861 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2157800636 @default.
• W2319330644 cites W2329894076 @default.
• W2319330644 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr019" @default.
• W2319330644 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2319330644 type Work @default.
• W2319330644 sameAs 2319330644 @default.
• W2319330644 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2319330644 countsByYear W23193306442012 @default.
• W2319330644 countsByYear W23193306442013 @default.
• W2319330644 countsByYear W23193306442014 @default.
• W2319330644 countsByYear W23193306442017 @default.
• W2319330644 countsByYear W23193306442021 @default.
• W2319330644 countsByYear W23193306442023 @default.
• W2319330644 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2319330644 hasAuthorship W2319330644A5011868607 @default.
• W2319330644 hasBestOaLocation W23193306441 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C137403100 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C542530943 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C107993555 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C137403100 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C144024400 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C149923435 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C166957645 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C17744445 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C199539241 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C205649164 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C2779343474 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C2908647359 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C542530943 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C555826173 @default.
• W2319330644 hasConceptScore W2319330644C94625758 @default.
• W2319330644 hasLocation W23193306441 @default.
• W2319330644 hasOpenAccess W2319330644 @default.
• W2319330644 hasPrimaryLocation W23193306441 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W118268595 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W1528558174 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W1972581370 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W1985917965 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2020449296 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2031340404 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2048854689 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2059204769 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2069685998 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2070490848 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2083574008 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2113470356 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2113911291 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2171319537 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2184424574 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2287268507 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2369817937 @default.
• W2319330644 hasRelatedWork W2394363085 @default.

• next