Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2319755967> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W2319755967 endingPage "A48" @default.
- W2319755967 startingPage "A48.1" @default.
- W2319755967 abstract "Introduction Intravenous sedation for colonoscopy is associated with cardiorespiratory risk and delayed recovery. There is also the perception that patients tolerate the procedure better with sedation. Moreover some studies suggest that colonoscopy performance is compromised if patients do not tolerate the procedure well. This study aimed to compare inhaled nitrous oxide (entonox) with intravenous sedation during colonoscopy in terms of completions rates, patient comfort and changes in physiological status. Methods 288 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were included performed by a single endoscopist. Carbon dioxide was used for insufflation. Patients were offered a choice to have intravenous sedation or entonox. Vital signs were recorded before, during and after the procedure. Following the colonoscopy, patients completed a satisfaction survey questionnaire charting symptoms of pain and bloating (modified 10 mm Visual analogue score tool) and the endoscopist scored patient comfort. Results Out of the 288 participants, 143 (48 women and 95 men) chose entonox and 145 (66 women and 79 men) opted for sedation. Of those who received entonox intially, 25 were converted to sedation during their procedure (results not reported). For those who had sedation, the mean dose of Midazolam was 2.4 mg (SD 0.6) and Pethidine was 28.5 mg (SD 9.0). The most common indications for colonoscopy in both groups were altered bowel habit, chronic diarrhoea and inflammatory bowel disease surveillance. Conclusion Entonox is as effective as intravenous sedation in relieving pain and bloating during colonoscopy without compromising performance. Entonox had less effect on systolic blood pressure suggesting it may be more appropriate in the elderly or those with cardio-pulmonary compromise. Disclosure of Interest None Declared" @default.
- W2319755967 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2319755967 creator A5012963964 @default.
- W2319755967 creator A5058397631 @default.
- W2319755967 creator A5066370423 @default.
- W2319755967 creator A5066998795 @default.
- W2319755967 creator A5076256333 @default.
- W2319755967 creator A5090373282 @default.
- W2319755967 date "2013-06-01" @default.
- W2319755967 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2319755967 title "PTU-016 Entonox vs Sedation in Colonoscopy: a Prospective Cohort Study: Abstract PTU-016 Table" @default.
- W2319755967 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304907.109" @default.
- W2319755967 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2319755967 type Work @default.
- W2319755967 sameAs 2319755967 @default.
- W2319755967 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2319755967 countsByYear W23197559672014 @default.
- W2319755967 countsByYear W23197559672021 @default.
- W2319755967 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2319755967 hasAuthorship W2319755967A5012963964 @default.
- W2319755967 hasAuthorship W2319755967A5058397631 @default.
- W2319755967 hasAuthorship W2319755967A5066370423 @default.
- W2319755967 hasAuthorship W2319755967A5066998795 @default.
- W2319755967 hasAuthorship W2319755967A5076256333 @default.
- W2319755967 hasAuthorship W2319755967A5090373282 @default.
- W2319755967 hasBestOaLocation W23197559671 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C2776814716 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C121608353 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C126322002 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C188816634 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C2776814716 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C2778435480 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C42219234 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C526805850 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C71924100 @default.
- W2319755967 hasConceptScore W2319755967C72563966 @default.
- W2319755967 hasIssue "Suppl 1" @default.
- W2319755967 hasLocation W23197559671 @default.
- W2319755967 hasOpenAccess W2319755967 @default.
- W2319755967 hasPrimaryLocation W23197559671 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2021156218 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2025702513 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2075002168 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2107370715 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2133957093 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2263160176 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2294336269 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2409581964 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2914514183 @default.
- W2319755967 hasRelatedWork W2953199224 @default.
- W2319755967 hasVolume "62" @default.
- W2319755967 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2319755967 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2319755967 magId "2319755967" @default.
- W2319755967 workType "article" @default.