FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2320199261> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2320199261 endingPage "2457" @default.
• W2320199261 startingPage "2447" @default.
• W2320199261 abstract "PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒 地上竞争对林下红松生物量分配的影响 DOI: 10.5846/stxb201103140312 作者: 作者单位: 北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室;北京林业大学理学院,北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室;北华大学林学院 作者简介: 通讯作者: 中图分类号: 基金项目: 国家林业行业科研专项(200904022, 20100400204) Effect of aboveground competition on biomass partitioning of understory Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) Author: Affiliation: The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University,The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University; College of Science, Beijing Forestry,The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University,The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University,The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education,Beijing Forestry University; College of Forestry, Beihua University, Jilin Fund Project: 摘要 | 图/表 | 访问统计 | 参考文献 | 相似文献 | 引证文献 | 资源附件 | 文章评论 摘要:采用整株收获法研究林下红松地上、地下生物量分配特征及地上竞争对其生物量分配和生物量相对生长的影响。结果表明,(1)将整个树冠划分为等长的上、中、下三层,活枝生物量从上层到下层逐渐增加,而针叶生物量主要集中在树冠中下层且在中下层的分布无显著差异(P>0.05),随着地下生物量逐渐增加,小细根(<2 mm)、粗细根(2-5 mm)的比例逐渐减小,而粗根(>5 mm)所占比例逐渐增大;(2)地上竞争强度与胸径、树高呈显著指数相关(P<0.001),随着竞争强度增大,胸径和树高均逐渐减小,树高胸径比与竞争强度呈显著线性相关(P<0.05),而树冠比率与竞争强度之间无显著相关性(P>0.05);(3)随着竞争强度增大,树干生物量占整株生物量的相对比例逐渐减小,而细根(小细根和粗细根)生物量相对比例逐渐增大,活枝、针叶及粗根生物量相对比例与竞争强度相关性并不显著(P>0.05);(4)红松根冠比均值为0.15且根冠比并不受地上竞争的影响,茎叶比与竞争强度的相关性亦不显著(P>0.05);(5)地上竞争显著影响红松地上各器官生物量的相对生长,且竞争强度与生物量呈显著负相关(P<0.001)。 Abstract:Competition is an important factor in biology and plant-plant interactions has inspired an increasing concern in recent years. In plant communities, competition is defined as the interaction between individuals, brought about by limited resources. Aboveground competition is usually size-asymmetric: the bigger individuals have a disproportionate advantage in competing for light than the smaller ones. This study deals with biomass allocation patterns and aboveground competition influences on biomass partitioning and allometric equations of understory Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis). The results will contribute to understanding the mechanisms of aboveground competition and provide a theoretical guide for effective utilization and protection of Korean pine. The results show that: (1) When dividing live crown into three equal layers (top, middle and bottom), live branch biomass increased from the top to the bottom layer, while needle biomass was highest in the middle and bottom layers of the crown. However, there was no significant difference between the needle biomass located at the middle and bottom layers (P>0.05). The relative proportion of coarse root (>5 mm) biomass increased while that of small fine root (<2 mm) and coarse fine root (2-5 mm) biomass both decreased with increasing total belowground biomass. (2) Stem diameter at breast height and tree height both showed a significantly exponential correlation with aboveground competition intensity (P<0.001). Breast-height diameter and tree height both decreased with increasing competition intensity. The ratio of tree height to breast-height diameter showed a significant linear relationship with competition intensity (P<0.05), whereas, there was no significant relationship (P>0.05) between competition intensity and crown ratio, which is defined as crown length divided by total tree height. (3) With increasing competition intensity, the relative proportion of stem biomass deceased while that of fine root (small fine root and coarse fine root) biomass increased. There was no significant relationship between competition intensity and the proportion of live branch, needle as well as coarse root biomass (P>0.05). (4) The average root to shoot ratio value was 0.15. This ratio was not affected by competition intensity (P>0.05). Similarly, the stem to needle biomass ratio also did not correlate with competition intensity (P>0.05). (5) Aboveground competition significantly affected the biomass allometry of aboveground biomass components and competition intensity showed a significant negative (P<0.001) correlation with biomass components. Thus, competition should not be disregarded in biomass studies. Regarding forest management, it is necessary to carry out tending operations to release the understory Korean pine trees from competition, in order to stimulate their growth, to obtain timber products and to protect the available germ plasm resource. 参考文献 相似文献 引证文献" @default.
• W2320199261 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2320199261 creator A5028691381 @default.
• W2320199261 creator A5069193138 @default.
• W2320199261 creator A5070559397 @default.
• W2320199261 creator A5084586199 @default.
• W2320199261 creator A5090449582 @default.
• W2320199261 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2320199261 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2320199261 title "Effect of aboveground competition on biomass partitioning of understory Korean pine (<i>Pinus koraiensis</i>)" @default.
• W2320199261 cites W1572166622 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W1968054382 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W1991634932 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2001661659 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2009047878 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2010099539 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2012273347 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2041670517 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2069013980 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2104328308 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2111559498 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2112726608 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2114473451 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2120827042 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2135584418 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2151950193 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2167991942 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2185347428 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2320186887 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2414440562 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2464417389 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2523353497 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W2898561895 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W3070193583 @default.
• W2320199261 cites W49461641 @default.
• W2320199261 doi "https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201103140312" @default.
• W2320199261 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2320199261 type Work @default.
• W2320199261 sameAs 2320199261 @default.
• W2320199261 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2320199261 countsByYear W23201992612017 @default.
• W2320199261 countsByYear W23201992612019 @default.
• W2320199261 countsByYear W23201992612020 @default.
• W2320199261 countsByYear W23201992612022 @default.
• W2320199261 countsByYear W23201992612023 @default.
• W2320199261 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2320199261 hasAuthorship W2320199261A5028691381 @default.
• W2320199261 hasAuthorship W2320199261A5069193138 @default.
• W2320199261 hasAuthorship W2320199261A5070559397 @default.
• W2320199261 hasAuthorship W2320199261A5084586199 @default.
• W2320199261 hasAuthorship W2320199261A5090449582 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C101000010 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C115540264 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C139669111 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C153279818 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C2775966360 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C2778304055 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C28631016 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C2993286701 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C521751864 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C54286561 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C101000010 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C115540264 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C139669111 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C153279818 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C166957645 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C17744445 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C18903297 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C191935318 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C199539241 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C205649164 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C2775966360 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C2778304055 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C28631016 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C2993286701 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C521751864 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C54286561 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C86803240 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C91306197 @default.
• W2320199261 hasConceptScore W2320199261C97137747 @default.
• W2320199261 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2320199261 hasLocation W23201992611 @default.
• W2320199261 hasOpenAccess W2320199261 @default.
• W2320199261 hasPrimaryLocation W23201992611 @default.
• W2320199261 hasRelatedWork W2183272167 @default.
• W2320199261 hasRelatedWork W2274406867 @default.
• W2320199261 hasRelatedWork W2400075722 @default.
• W2320199261 hasRelatedWork W2525524437 @default.
• W2320199261 hasRelatedWork W2776391638 @default.

• next