FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2320569759> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2320569759 endingPage "864" @default.
• W2320569759 startingPage "857" @default.
• W2320569759 abstract "In Brief Study Design. A systematic review of published trials in orthopedic spine literature. Objective. To determine the quality of reporting in open spine surgery randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 2005 and 2010 with special focus on the reporting of surgical skill or expertise. Summary of Background Data. In technically demanding procedures such as spine surgery, a surgeon's skill and expertise is expected to play an important role in the outcome of the procedure. To appraise the reported treatment effect of spine surgery related RCTs adequately, any potential skill or experience bias must be reported. Methods. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were systematically searched for open spine surgery RCTs published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2010. Percutaneous techniques were excluded. The quality of reporting of all eligible studies was determined using the checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial. The reporting of surgeons' skill and experience was scored additionally. Subsequently, all authors were surveyed to determine if any information on methodological safeguards was omitted from their reports. All data were analyzed in 2-year time frames. Results. Ninety-nine RCTs were included. Ten studies (10%) described surgical skill or experience, mostly as a description of the learning curve. The majority of publications were unclear about “concealment of treatment allocation” (77%), “blinding of participants” (68%), “blinding of outcome assessors” (77%), and “adhering to the intention-to-treat principle” (67%). Of the 99 surveys, we received 22 (22%) completed questionnaires. In these questionnaires, information about essential methodological safeguards was often available, although not reported in the primary publication. Conclusion. This study shows that in open spine surgery RCTs information on skill and experience is scarcely reported. Authors often fail to report essential methodological safeguards. These studies may therefore be prone to expertise bias. Surgeon's skill and experience may play a role in the outcome of demanding surgery. A review of open spine surgery randomized controlled trials was conducted to determine quality of reporting level of skill and experience. Analysis of 99 spine surgery randomized controlled trials shows that authors often fail to report essential methodological safeguards, including skill and experience." @default.
• W2320569759 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2320569759 creator A5021929276 @default.
• W2320569759 creator A5022106962 @default.
• W2320569759 creator A5030765772 @default.
• W2320569759 creator A5058391099 @default.
• W2320569759 creator A5073534215 @default.
• W2320569759 date "2013-05-01" @default.
• W2320569759 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2320569759 title "Do Authors Report Surgical Expertise in Open Spine Surgery Related Randomized Controlled Trials? A Systematic Review on Quality of Reporting" @default.
• W2320569759 cites W122122986 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W1529485074 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W1967839855 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W1971606990 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W1973873228 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W1992019735 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W1994065729 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2002261807 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2015260345 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2018946200 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2024558001 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2027395342 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2036072738 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2053603062 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2055618730 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2056772768 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2067925665 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2096968635 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2119409020 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2126808961 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2134120248 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2142960568 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2143382603 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2145944428 @default.
• W2320569759 cites W2147581820 @default.
• W2320569759 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31827ecb1c" @default.
• W2320569759 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23629454" @default.
• W2320569759 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2320569759 type Work @default.
• W2320569759 sameAs 2320569759 @default.
• W2320569759 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592013 @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592014 @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592015 @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592016 @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592017 @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592018 @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592019 @default.
• W2320569759 countsByYear W23205697592020 @default.
• W2320569759 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2320569759 hasAuthorship W2320569759A5021929276 @default.
• W2320569759 hasAuthorship W2320569759A5022106962 @default.
• W2320569759 hasAuthorship W2320569759A5030765772 @default.
• W2320569759 hasAuthorship W2320569759A5058391099 @default.
• W2320569759 hasAuthorship W2320569759A5073534215 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C2771230 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C141071460 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C142724271 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C15744967 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C168563851 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C17744445 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C180747234 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C1862650 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C189708586 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C19527891 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C19648533 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C199539241 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C204787440 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C2771230 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C2776478404 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C2779356329 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C2779473830 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C68312169 @default.
• W2320569759 hasConceptScore W2320569759C71924100 @default.
• W2320569759 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2320569759 hasLocation W23205697591 @default.
• W2320569759 hasLocation W23205697592 @default.
• W2320569759 hasOpenAccess W2320569759 @default.
• W2320569759 hasPrimaryLocation W23205697591 @default.
• W2320569759 hasRelatedWork W1996551696 @default.
• W2320569759 hasRelatedWork W2011976818 @default.

• next