FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2320791885> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2320791885 endingPage "305" @default.
• W2320791885 startingPage "295" @default.
• W2320791885 abstract "Background. Concerns about quality of care are increasing as hospitals struggle to lower costs. Hospital report cards are controversial, but little is known about their impact. Objectives. To determine whether recent hospital report cards are viewed more favorably than pioneering federal efforts; whether a report based on clinical data is viewed more favorably than one based on administrative data; and whether attitudes toward report cards are related to hospital characteristics. Design. Mailed survey of chief executives at 374 California hospitals and 31 New York hospitals listed in report cards on myocardial infarction and coronary bypass mortality. Subjects. Two-hundred-and-seventy-four hospitals in California (73.3% response) and 27 in New York (87.1% response). California hospitals were categorized on ownership, size, occupancy, risk-adjusted mortality, teaching status, patient volume, and surgical capability. Measures. Number of hospital units that received or discussed the report card, ratings of its quality, perceptions of its usefulness, and knowledge of its methods. Results. In both states, report cards were widely disseminated within hospitals. The mean quality rating was higher (P = 0.0074) in New York than in California; New York respondents appeared to be more knowledgeable about key methods. One or more hospital characteristics was associated with each outcome measure. Leaders at high-mortality hospitals were especially critical and did not find the report useful, despite limited understanding of its methods. Conclusions. Recent hospital report cards were rated better than pioneering federal efforts. A report based on clinical data was rated better, understood better, and disseminated more often to key staff than one that was based on administrative data. Barriers to constructive use of outcomes data persist, especially at high mortality hospitals." @default.
• W2320791885 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2320791885 creator A5007567679 @default.
• W2320791885 creator A5066468283 @default.
• W2320791885 creator A5008805605 @default.
• W2320791885 date "1999-03-01" @default.
• W2320791885 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2320791885 title "Grading the Graders" @default.
• W2320791885 cites W1990667948 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2027496414 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2028664096 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2032035920 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2035998922 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2052255184 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2080585630 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2091123211 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2413831883 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W2461544021 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W4232530397 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W4250118339 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W4251192517 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W4254768814 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W4256538069 @default.
• W2320791885 cites W650163 @default.
• W2320791885 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199903000-00009" @default.
• W2320791885 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10098573" @default.
• W2320791885 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2320791885 type Work @default.
• W2320791885 sameAs 2320791885 @default.
• W2320791885 citedByCount "59" @default.
• W2320791885 countsByYear W23207918852012 @default.
• W2320791885 countsByYear W23207918852013 @default.
• W2320791885 countsByYear W23207918852014 @default.
• W2320791885 countsByYear W23207918852015 @default.
• W2320791885 countsByYear W23207918852017 @default.
• W2320791885 countsByYear W23207918852020 @default.
• W2320791885 countsByYear W23207918852023 @default.
• W2320791885 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2320791885 hasAuthorship W2320791885A5007567679 @default.
• W2320791885 hasAuthorship W2320791885A5008805605 @default.
• W2320791885 hasAuthorship W2320791885A5066468283 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C2781256697 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C127413603 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C147176958 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C15744967 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C19417346 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C2777286243 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C2781256697 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C512399662 @default.
• W2320791885 hasConceptScore W2320791885C71924100 @default.
• W2320791885 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2320791885 hasLocation W23207918851 @default.
• W2320791885 hasLocation W23207918852 @default.
• W2320791885 hasOpenAccess W2320791885 @default.
• W2320791885 hasPrimaryLocation W23207918851 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W1940278713 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W2095794948 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W2129672687 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W2134497575 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W2136593327 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W2157438050 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W2732301965 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W292856683 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W3062584 @default.
• W2320791885 hasRelatedWork W3216937666 @default.
• W2320791885 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W2320791885 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2320791885 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2320791885 magId "2320791885" @default.
• W2320791885 workType "article" @default.