FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2321013992> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2321013992 endingPage "337" @default.
• W2321013992 startingPage "335" @default.
• W2321013992 abstract "Mandates for pathology training are a topic sure to surface “hot button” issues whatever the venue or whatever the combination of viewpoints gathered around the water cooler. A national pathology fellowship match administered by the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) is the latest in a series of controversies affecting residents preparing for a future in our discipline and the programs entrusted with their education and professional development. Crawford and coauthors,1 representing the Association of Pathology Chairs (APC) and its program directors section (PRODS), argue in this issue of the Journal that a pan-pathology fellowship match is the best solution for problems exacerbated by changes in credentialing requirements for board certification in pathology. Other opinion leaders and organizations, including the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology (ADASP), are unconvinced.The primary rationale for a pan-pathology fellowship match offered by Crawford and colleagues1 is the perception of “widespread dissatisfaction” among affected residents driven primarily by a single event in 2007 at which only a small fraction of the national resident pool was present and fewer still accounted for the residents sufficiently motivated to “overrun” the microphone. More inclusive data drawn from American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Resident In-Service Examination surveys showed that, in fact, only a minority of pathology residents were in favor of a fellowship match when asked in 2007 (39%), 2008 (26%), and 2010 (47%).1 Paradoxically, the same survey results showed that a consistent majority supported having a uniform fellowship application timeline. In an independent survey targeting members of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Residents Forum and the ASCP Resident Liaison Network, only 43% of resident respondents were in favor of a match despite also identifying absence of clear and consistent application deadlines as an issue for fellowship applicants.2 These results resonate …" @default.
• W2321013992 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2321013992 creator A5027310466 @default.
• W2321013992 creator A5043019515 @default.
• W2321013992 creator A5049047912 @default.
• W2321013992 creator A5087572312 @default.
• W2321013992 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2321013992 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2321013992 title "Matching Residents to Pathology Fellowships" @default.
• W2321013992 cites W1964945921 @default.
• W2321013992 cites W2027752664 @default.
• W2321013992 cites W2048046471 @default.
• W2321013992 cites W2048255107 @default.
• W2321013992 cites W4256458068 @default.
• W2321013992 doi "https://doi.org/10.1309/ajcpza19tuvbxdjv" @default.
• W2321013992 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21350086" @default.
• W2321013992 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2321013992 type Work @default.
• W2321013992 sameAs 2321013992 @default.
• W2321013992 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W2321013992 countsByYear W23210139922012 @default.
• W2321013992 countsByYear W23210139922013 @default.
• W2321013992 countsByYear W23210139922014 @default.
• W2321013992 countsByYear W23210139922018 @default.
• W2321013992 countsByYear W23210139922019 @default.
• W2321013992 countsByYear W23210139922021 @default.
• W2321013992 countsByYear W23210139922022 @default.
• W2321013992 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2321013992 hasAuthorship W2321013992A5027310466 @default.
• W2321013992 hasAuthorship W2321013992A5043019515 @default.
• W2321013992 hasAuthorship W2321013992A5049047912 @default.
• W2321013992 hasAuthorship W2321013992A5087572312 @default.
• W2321013992 hasBestOaLocation W23210139921 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConcept C204232928 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConcept C549673821 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConceptScore W2321013992C142724271 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConceptScore W2321013992C19527891 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConceptScore W2321013992C204232928 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConceptScore W2321013992C549673821 @default.
• W2321013992 hasConceptScore W2321013992C71924100 @default.
• W2321013992 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2321013992 hasLocation W23210139921 @default.
• W2321013992 hasLocation W23210139922 @default.
• W2321013992 hasOpenAccess W2321013992 @default.
• W2321013992 hasPrimaryLocation W23210139921 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W2093743533 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W2106178927 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W2250936009 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W2416890529 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W2441472958 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W2944905252 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W3210667007 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W4239524255 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W4385516634 @default.
• W2321013992 hasRelatedWork W646344567 @default.
• W2321013992 hasVolume "135" @default.
• W2321013992 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2321013992 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2321013992 magId "2321013992" @default.
• W2321013992 workType "article" @default.