Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2321767537> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 82 of
82
with 100 items per page.
- W2321767537 endingPage "125" @default.
- W2321767537 startingPage "116" @default.
- W2321767537 abstract "-Although many biologists acknowledge a fundamental relationship between species concepts and the processes thought to give rise to species, there is less agreement on the extent and desirability of this relationship. While some advocate species concepts explicitly linked to particular mechanisms of speciation, others believe that concepts will function best when they are independent of particular notions of process. The existence of a diversity of interpretations of has hampered a clear view of the concept-process link. Although there are general reciprocal constraints between concepts and processes, we suggest that it is profitable to maintain species concepts logically distinct from particular mechanisms of speciation. We analyze an example (from the work of Hugh Paterson) in which such a logical distinction between concept and process has not been maintained. Paterson makes the validity of the biological species concept contingent upon a particular process of speciation (reinforcement). However, such a link occurs only if biologists impose the requirement that a species criterion be a functional trait. We argue that what qualifies the members or parts of evolving populations as different species is not a function of the particular mechanism that drives the divergence. [Species concepts; speciation; mate recognition.] Two of the most fundamental problems in evolutionary biology are the proper definition of species (species concepts) and the origin of species (speciation). Because the voluminous literature devoted to these topics has tended to treat these problems separately, there has been relatively little explicit attention to the logical nexus between a species concept and possible processes of speciation. Nevertheless, those who have discussed the concept-process relationship (e.g,. Sokal, 1973; Wiley, 1978; Cracraft, 1983, 1987; Rosenberg, 1985; Templeton, 1989) suggest that an explicit analysis of this relationship may be crucial to further progress in both areas. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the issues and discussions surrounding the link between concept and process and to analyze a specific example from the recent literature. We suggest that biologists hold differing (sometimes implicit) views of this relationship, that some ambiguity remains concerning the nature of the relationship, and that species concepts which are not linked to particular theories of speciation will be most fruitful. We do not attempt to provide an exhaustive review or a definitive solution to the issues raised, but rather to bring the questions into sharper focus." @default.
- W2321767537 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2321767537 creator A5066293832 @default.
- W2321767537 creator A5091305192 @default.
- W2321767537 date "1989-06-01" @default.
- W2321767537 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2321767537 title "On the Relationship Between Species Concepts and Speciation Processes" @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1493529132 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1596710757 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1599192329 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1966329389 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1978796180 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1980001312 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1983520080 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1984306711 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1988308488 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W1992738114 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2003879785 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2004109788 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2004778468 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2007993714 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2010177277 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2020289104 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2038017122 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2041812115 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2047727977 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2072810112 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2086604107 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2087971633 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2088665077 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2101830402 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2139135174 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2172760571 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2316318369 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2319122186 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2321476499 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2324852289 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2327653460 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2330719889 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2334768822 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2335384032 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2939920900 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W2954663393 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W3011017011 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W3180751057 @default.
- W2321767537 cites W590591381 @default.
- W2321767537 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/38.2.116" @default.
- W2321767537 hasPublicationYear "1989" @default.
- W2321767537 type Work @default.
- W2321767537 sameAs 2321767537 @default.
- W2321767537 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W2321767537 countsByYear W23217675372013 @default.
- W2321767537 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2321767537 hasAuthorship W2321767537A5066293832 @default.
- W2321767537 hasAuthorship W2321767537A5091305192 @default.
- W2321767537 hasConcept C2776838516 @default.
- W2321767537 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
- W2321767537 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2321767537 hasConceptScore W2321767537C2776838516 @default.
- W2321767537 hasConceptScore W2321767537C78458016 @default.
- W2321767537 hasConceptScore W2321767537C86803240 @default.
- W2321767537 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2321767537 hasLocation W23217675371 @default.
- W2321767537 hasOpenAccess W2321767537 @default.
- W2321767537 hasPrimaryLocation W23217675371 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W1917673492 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W2096830084 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W2100456219 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W2150430807 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W2321356823 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W4243082633 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W4248377049 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W4254171234 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W4255036636 @default.
- W2321767537 hasRelatedWork W636730320 @default.
- W2321767537 hasVolume "38" @default.
- W2321767537 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2321767537 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2321767537 magId "2321767537" @default.
- W2321767537 workType "article" @default.