FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2321825012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2321825012 endingPage "48" @default.
• W2321825012 startingPage "29" @default.
• W2321825012 abstract "Within modern liberal political philosophy, discussions on justice have been centered upon an individualism-based distributive justice and the ‘fair share’ due to each person. According to the liberal theory of justice, the individual is an entity of rational reason and moral autonomy and considers the interests of others and of the community from a viewpoint that is focused on one`s own interests. As practical principles of justice, the principle of desert has attempted to separate the individual`s natural and inherent abilities (merit) from the individual`s intentional efforts (desert); while the principle of needs has transmuted into a set of minimum exclusivity rights to protect the individual`s autonomy from serious harm and injury. Procedural justice theorists such as Rawls have attempted to invalidate the merit of the individual in an attempt to establish the identity of individuals whom are independent of the community, in the effort to promote their ideas on how to mitigate the social inequality that results from natural arbitrariness. The requirement to finalize this logical process is a strong moral reason equipped individual with the capacity of rational action. However, paradoxically, the logic of excessive reason has created an individual who is exclusive-rights-empowered but becomes ‘isolated and selfish’. The issues resulting from this situation are, first, the rational individual who is equipped with moral autonomy now becomes hidden behind a system-guaranteed set of exclusive rights; and second, the individual who should have been a rational actor and actively participating in cooperation and reciprocal relationships, does not find it easy to overcome the temptations of becoming a strategically located but passive and selfish actor within the mass market order. The result is that individuals easily relinquish their moral autonomy and exhibit a tendency to focus on personal gain. This has resulted in an increase in the polarization of society, and an increase of conflict between classes; and has engendered a crisis in the common good of the family and the political community. The true ‘good life’ and the ‘well-ordered community’ cannot be obtained by individuals who are only interested in their ‘share’, but requires ‘good citizens’ who are concerned about the happiness of others and of the society. When we are able to understand that the rational and selfish individual is necessarily non-self-sufficient; and acknowledge that there is a need for mutual philia with others, we will then be able to overcome rational reason and embrace civic friendship. The good citizen of a healthy community that is based on civic friendship, is an individual who has assimilated the virtue of justice, and will be able to aid in overcoming the limitations of modern liberalism, assist in the resolution of the pressing societal and individualistic crises and contribute to the establishment of a ‘well-ordered community’." @default.
• W2321825012 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2321825012 creator A5000998618 @default.
• W2321825012 date "2014-05-01" @default.
• W2321825012 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2321825012 title "A Critical Review on Civic Friendship andthe Liberal Theory of Justice : AnExploration of Self Identity and the Basis of Fair Share" @default.
• W2321825012 doi "https://doi.org/10.15801/je.1.95.201405.29" @default.
• W2321825012 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2321825012 type Work @default.
• W2321825012 sameAs 2321825012 @default.
• W2321825012 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2321825012 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2321825012 hasAuthorship W2321825012A5000998618 @default.
• W2321825012 hasBestOaLocation W23218250121 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C2778355321 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C2778736484 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C107038049 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C138885662 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C139621336 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C144024400 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C17744445 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C190253527 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C199539241 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C2778355321 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C2778736484 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C36289849 @default.
• W2321825012 hasConceptScore W2321825012C73484699 @default.
• W2321825012 hasIssue "95" @default.
• W2321825012 hasLocation W23218250121 @default.
• W2321825012 hasOpenAccess W2321825012 @default.
• W2321825012 hasPrimaryLocation W23218250121 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W1514339810 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W2071144117 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W2149195883 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W2158635314 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W2487031902 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W4293773973 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W4300487477 @default.
• W2321825012 hasRelatedWork W6313198 @default.
• W2321825012 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W2321825012 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2321825012 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2321825012 magId "2321825012" @default.
• W2321825012 workType "article" @default.