FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2321825974> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2321825974 endingPage "e858" @default.
• W2321825974 startingPage "e858" @default.
• W2321825974 abstract "Upper back pain originating from the cervical disk itself is defined as cervical discogenic upper back pain. Coblation procedures can provide therapeutic effects for neck and radicular pain related to contained cervical disk herniation. However, no studies have reported the performance of coblation procedures, particularly for treating cervical discogenic upper back pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of coblation procedures in treating cervical discogenic upper back pain. In a prospective, clinical, observational study, 28 consecutive patients with discogenic upper back pain underwent coblation procedures on the cervical disk with a percutaneous anterior approach. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, patient responses stating significant (≥50%) pain relief, significant (≥50%) reduction in pain medicine intake and Modified MacNab criteria were adopted to evaluate the pain intensity, degree of pain relief, and functional status after 12 months of follow-up. The preoperative pain VAS score was 6.5 ± 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.085–6.915), and the pain VAS score significantly decreased to 2.4 ± 1.3 (95% CI 1.929–2.928), 2.5 ± 1.5 (95% CI 1.963–3.109), 2.7 ± 1.4 (95% CI 2.157–3.271), 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.457–3.686), and 3.1 ± 1.6 (95% CI 2.471–3.743) at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.05). Twenty-two (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), 19 (67.9%), and 18 (64.3%) of the patients expressed significant pain relief at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. 24 (85.7%), 23 (82.1%), 23 (82.1%), and 22 (78.6%) reported significant reduction in pain medication intake at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. According to the Modified MacNab criteria, the numbers of patients with “excellent” or “good” ratings were 22 (78.6%), 21 (75.0%), 20 (71.4%), and 18 (64.3%) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. No serious complications were observed. The findings of this study showed that coblation is an effective, safe, minimally invasive, and less uncomfortable procedure for the treatment of discogenic upper back pain." @default.
• W2321825974 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2321825974 creator A5031315906 @default.
• W2321825974 creator A5033491493 @default.
• W2321825974 creator A5077034623 @default.
• W2321825974 creator A5082782818 @default.
• W2321825974 creator A5087315345 @default.
• W2321825974 date "2015-05-01" @default.
• W2321825974 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2321825974 title "Efficacy of Coblation Technology in Treating Cervical Discogenic Upper Back Pain" @default.
• W2321825974 cites W151214717 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W1964228822 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W1973498888 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W1981630516 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W1986538784 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W1998899821 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2009648994 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2035707363 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2042236628 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2073386225 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2084434181 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2086818553 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2087381852 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2091734353 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2093797471 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2101412581 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2113650603 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2118436663 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2133514067 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2139170681 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2184971487 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2198229360 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2333782843 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W2890089549 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W3139001935 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W4232197577 @default.
• W2321825974 cites W76312985 @default.
• W2321825974 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000000858" @default.
• W2321825974 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4602856" @default.
• W2321825974 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25997062" @default.
• W2321825974 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2321825974 type Work @default.
• W2321825974 sameAs 2321825974 @default.
• W2321825974 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2321825974 countsByYear W23218259742016 @default.
• W2321825974 countsByYear W23218259742017 @default.
• W2321825974 countsByYear W23218259742018 @default.
• W2321825974 countsByYear W23218259742019 @default.
• W2321825974 countsByYear W23218259742021 @default.
• W2321825974 countsByYear W23218259742023 @default.
• W2321825974 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2321825974 hasAuthorship W2321825974A5031315906 @default.
• W2321825974 hasAuthorship W2321825974A5033491493 @default.
• W2321825974 hasAuthorship W2321825974A5077034623 @default.
• W2321825974 hasAuthorship W2321825974A5082782818 @default.
• W2321825974 hasAuthorship W2321825974A5087315345 @default.
• W2321825974 hasBestOaLocation W23218259741 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C2776501849 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C2779978343 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C2781038967 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C2910131515 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C126322002 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C141071460 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C14184104 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C142724271 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C188816634 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C204787440 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C2776501849 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C2779978343 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C2780813298 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C2781038967 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C2910131515 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C2985379065 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C42219234 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C44249647 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C44575665 @default.
• W2321825974 hasConceptScore W2321825974C71924100 @default.
• W2321825974 hasIssue "20" @default.
• W2321825974 hasLocation W23218259741 @default.
• W2321825974 hasLocation W23218259742 @default.
• W2321825974 hasLocation W23218259743 @default.
• W2321825974 hasLocation W23218259744 @default.
• W2321825974 hasOpenAccess W2321825974 @default.
• W2321825974 hasPrimaryLocation W23218259741 @default.
• W2321825974 hasRelatedWork W1968092337 @default.
• W2321825974 hasRelatedWork W2084770513 @default.

• next