FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2321826184> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2321826184 endingPage "252" @default.
• W2321826184 startingPage "244" @default.
• W2321826184 abstract "Emergency nurses assess patients using objective and subjective data. When the charge nurse takes report from a paramedic, another form of assessment occurs. By eliciting apt data and using trauma-scoring criteria, a decision to enact a trauma code occurs. Considering the cost and staff utilization, it is important for the charge nurse to make sound decisions when activating a trauma code. The objective of this study is to explore the validity of nurses' use of intuition in patients to predict the severity of their injuries, and whether it impacts their choice to institute a trauma code.The study design was a descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional record review and cohort analysis. The setting was a rural Trauma Level III emergency department (ED) located 80 miles from the nearest Level I trauma center. Phase I was a convenience cluster sample of all charge nurses in an ED. Phase II was a collection of all trauma records from June 2010 to May 2012. The inclusion criterion for Phase I subjects was that all participants were currently working as ED charge nurses. Analysis for Phase I data consisted of evaluating demographic information provided in questions 1 through 6 in a questionnaire. For Phase II data, a power analysis using Cohen's d was performed to determine the sample size to be evaluated. On the basis of the 2012 trauma data, a total of 419 records needed to be assessed (confidence interval, 0.164; P < .286). Two groups were created: (1) gut instinct only, and (2) all other criteria. Injury severity scores were categorized by ascending severity: (1) 0 to 4, (2) 5 to 9, (3) 10 to 16, (4) 17 to 24, and (5) greater than 25. The data analysis consisted of a 2-tailed t test for probability and a linear regression analysis using Pearson's r for correlation. In Phase I, 6 of the 8 charge nurses responded. Results showed an average of greater than 10 years of experience as an ED registered nurse, certification was equally yes and no, and highest level of education was at the BSN level. Phase II consisted of a review of 393 eligible medical files during the specified period. Because of the lack of sufficient data, 33 records were excluded. A total of 360 files remained with 109 in the gut instinct and 251 in the other category. A t test was performed using a 2-tailed test with an α value of .05. Results were a t-score of 0.02, and the null hypothesis was rejected. To evaluate the linear relationship between the sets of data, a Pearson's r correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the relationship between the 2 variables. Results indicated a strong positive correlation (r = 0.992; P ≤ .001).Intuition is a well-known phenomenon within the nursing community, but it is an abstract concept that is difficult to substantiate. To enhance the development of properly utilizing intuition in practice, I suggest pairing experienced with novice nurses in their patient assignments. This would enable the less proficient nurse to observe and ask questions about the rationale surrounding decisions the expert nurse has made regarding patient assessment and care." @default.
• W2321826184 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2321826184 creator A5049430073 @default.
• W2321826184 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2321826184 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2321826184 title "Nursing Intuition as an Assessment Tool in Predicting Severity of Injury in Trauma Patients" @default.
• W2321826184 cites W2099018666 @default.
• W2321826184 cites W2133835051 @default.
• W2321826184 cites W2315587423 @default.
• W2321826184 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/jtn.0000000000000072" @default.
• W2321826184 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25198081" @default.
• W2321826184 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2321826184 type Work @default.
• W2321826184 sameAs 2321826184 @default.
• W2321826184 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2321826184 countsByYear W23218261842016 @default.
• W2321826184 countsByYear W23218261842017 @default.
• W2321826184 countsByYear W23218261842019 @default.
• W2321826184 countsByYear W23218261842020 @default.
• W2321826184 countsByYear W23218261842023 @default.
• W2321826184 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2321826184 hasAuthorship W2321826184A5049430073 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C132010649 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C187155963 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C190385971 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C2780110798 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConcept C85004164 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C105795698 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C126322002 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C129848803 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C132010649 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C141071460 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C142724271 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C15744967 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C159110408 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C167135981 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C187155963 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C188147891 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C190385971 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C194828623 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C2780110798 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C2780724011 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C3017944768 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C33923547 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C39896193 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C44249647 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C545542383 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C71924100 @default.
• W2321826184 hasConceptScore W2321826184C85004164 @default.
• W2321826184 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2321826184 hasLocation W23218261841 @default.
• W2321826184 hasLocation W23218261842 @default.
• W2321826184 hasOpenAccess W2321826184 @default.
• W2321826184 hasPrimaryLocation W23218261841 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W2028517814 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W2085641253 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W2087876009 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W2105210204 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W2287078641 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W2791959495 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W2911827542 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W3035266956 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W4242352147 @default.
• W2321826184 hasRelatedWork W4320491207 @default.
• W2321826184 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W2321826184 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2321826184 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2321826184 magId "2321826184" @default.
• W2321826184 workType "article" @default.