FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2321833666> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2321833666 endingPage "2" @default.
• W2321833666 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2321833666 abstract "Acting as a usual means of everyday communication and collaboration, dialogue is also a fundamental mode of human presence in the world. It is innate and, therefore, feels organic to people. Nothing but a dialogue determines and defines the inborn human potential of reflexivity, empathy and communitivity. Naturally, it is hardly surprising that as a phenomenon, a dialogue constantly fell within the purview of most prominent European thinkers and throughout different historical epochs, in the spaces of philosophy and communication, it unfolded in a diverse and multidimensional manner. Ancient Greek philosopher Plato wrote in the form of dialogue, this way opening the possibility to a reader to learn about the world and the order of things as well as defining a certain relationship between the perceiving subject and the perceivable object. In the early Middle Ages, writings of Saint Augustine encouraged people to immerse into themselves and start a conversation with God, which established a certain living relationship between spaces empirical and transcendental. Much later, towards the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century, German phenomenologist Edmund Husserl, who developed the theory of the intentionality of the consciousness, perceived that no living relationship between people is feasible without intersubjectivity. In this case, the communication is conditioned on the focus of at least two subjects on a certain object. This object, in particular, ensures the potential of the meaning, content and the purpose of communication. Another German author Martin Buber treated the dialogue as a phenomenon, in which an individual establishes a personal relationship with the Christian God, and this gives rise to a certain immediacy: a confrontation with the Ruler of the Kingdom of Heaven gives meaning to all the other interpersonal relationships. These are but few different philosophical interpretations of dialogue as a phenomenon. The universe of issues related to dialogue emerges from thinking perspectives of philosophers as well as communication theorists. On the one hand, the perspective of communication trivializes the phenomenon of dialogue, depriving it of its depth and profoundness; and on the other hand, it defines and specifies the concept of dialogue, assigning to it a form or function. This issue of the journal is devoted to the analysis of the phenomenon of dialogue both in the fields of philosophy and communication, inquiring into different contexts of its development. In her article Communication Solutions by Improving Interactive Art Projects, Gintarė Vainalavičiūtė analyses the relationship between visual arts and contemporary technologies, which determines both the rise of the forms of dialogue and non-traditional understanding of works of art. Mindaugas Stoškus contributed an article entitled Disciplines of Political Philosophy and Political Science: Antagonism, Cooperation or Indifference? in which he investigates the relationship between these two disciplines, conditions and problems pertaining to their dialogue, and the particularly intensified dynamics of the dialogue in the fifties of the 20th century. In their article Online Artistic Activism: Case-Study of Hungarian-Romanian Intercultural Communication, Gizela Horváth and Rozália Klára Bakó delve into the interactive relationship between works of art and their perceiver, as these works of art send messages via the social media environment. Moral Perception, Cognition, and Dialogue is an article authored by Vojko Strahovnik, in which he examines the causes for the rise of cases that hinder intercommunication and mutual understanding, such as disagreement, intercultural dialogues, etc. Problems of visual communication and the specificity of visual languages, bringing together subjects into dialogue are discussed by Arto Mutanen in his article Relativity of Visual Communication. Another article entitled Scientific Realism versus Antirealism in Science Education is a contribution by Seungbae Park, in which he attempts to define how the dialogue between teachers and students is possible, as he takes the position stating that the doctrine of scientific realism is much more effective than provided opportunities of scientific antirealism. And finally, Algis Mickūnas, in his article The Different Other and Dialogue, discusses the reasons why members of different communities find it difficult to establish dialogue-based relationships and why in some cases they remain imprisoned in the state of a monologue. This issue of the journal presents a truly wide field of investigations into opportunities and obstacles for communication, interaction and collaboration. It is pleasing to see that representatives of various humanities and social sciences joined the same dialogue. Looking forward to the productive insights in the future, the Editor would like to express her gratitude to the authors of this issue." @default.
• W2321833666 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2321833666 creator A5037399804 @default.
• W2321833666 date "2016-03-31" @default.
• W2321833666 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2321833666 title "Editorial. Dialogue, Communication and Collaboration: Aspects of Philosophy and Communication" @default.
• W2321833666 doi "https://doi.org/10.3846/cpc.2016.246" @default.
• W2321833666 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2321833666 type Work @default.
• W2321833666 sameAs 2321833666 @default.
• W2321833666 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2321833666 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2321833666 hasAuthorship W2321833666A5037399804 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C13200473 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C186720457 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C188370112 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C2776261394 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C2777200299 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C2777200700 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C2777644567 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C2779885105 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C2781238097 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C30539005 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C50335755 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C107038049 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C111472728 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C13200473 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C136815107 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C138885662 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C144024400 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C154775046 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C15744967 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C17744445 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C186720457 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C188370112 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C199539241 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C2776261394 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C2777200299 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C2777200700 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C2777644567 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C2779885105 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C2780876879 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C2781238097 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C30539005 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C36289849 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C41895202 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C46312422 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C50335755 @default.
• W2321833666 hasConceptScore W2321833666C77805123 @default.
• W2321833666 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2321833666 hasLocation W23218336661 @default.
• W2321833666 hasOpenAccess W2321833666 @default.
• W2321833666 hasPrimaryLocation W23218336661 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W1588556810 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W1964491852 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W1980480379 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W2070720935 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W2321833666 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W2348325645 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W2961224124 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W2969704664 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W2461434864 @default.
• W2321833666 hasRelatedWork W3125918179 @default.
• W2321833666 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W2321833666 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2321833666 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2321833666 magId "2321833666" @default.
• W2321833666 workType "article" @default.