FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2322777763> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2322777763 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologySurgical Technology & Simulation: Instrumentation & Technology I1 Apr 2016MP23-09 ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION FOR NON-SEMINOMATOUS TESTICULAR CANCER IN THE PRIMARY SETTING: A RETROSPECTIVE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS Michael Marshall, Haidar Abdul-Muhsin, Sean Stroup, Ithaar Derweesh, Michael Woods, James Porter, Erik Castle, and James L'Esperance Michael MarshallMichael Marshall More articles by this author , Haidar Abdul-MuhsinHaidar Abdul-Muhsin More articles by this author , Sean StroupSean Stroup More articles by this author , Ithaar DerweeshIthaar Derweesh More articles by this author , Michael WoodsMichael Woods More articles by this author , James PorterJames Porter More articles by this author , Erik CastleErik Castle More articles by this author , and James L'EsperanceJames L'Esperance More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.731AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RA-RPLND) for testicular cancer is an advanced surgical technique that has been slow to gain acceptance due to technical challenges and concerns about patient safety and oncologic efficacy. Herein, we report a multi-institutional analysis of RA-RPLND compared to the traditional open midline approach (O-RPLND) in the primary setting. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of 117 men with non-seminomatous testicular cancer who underwent either RA-RPLND or O-RPLND in the primary setting. The robotic technique performed has been described previously. A prospective, nerve-sparing approach was used for a majority of cases. Pertinent comparisons were made between each approach. RESULTS From March 1999 to June 2015, 69 RA-RPLND and 48 O-RPLND were conducted in the primary setting. Patient demographics and operative times were similar between groups. RA-RPLND showed statistically better outcomes in regard to intraoperative blood loss, post-operative pain, and duration of post-operative hospitalization. A significant number of high-grade complications were noted in the O-RPLND group whereas none were noted in the RA-RPLND group. Oncologic efficacy was suggested by similarities in total number of lymph nodes obtained, presence of occult stage II disease, and overall recurrence rates between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS RA-RPLND for non-seminomatous testicular cancer in the primary setting is safer, less morbid, and better tolerated than the traditional open approach. Our data suggests oncologic equivalency between the two approaches substantiating the continued use of RA-RPLND to treat this select group of patients. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e264-e265 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Michael Marshall More articles by this author Haidar Abdul-Muhsin More articles by this author Sean Stroup More articles by this author Ithaar Derweesh More articles by this author Michael Woods More articles by this author James Porter More articles by this author Erik Castle More articles by this author James L'Esperance More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2322777763 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5000639306 @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5004285397 @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5031102533 @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5032869458 @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5069174478 @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5077520250 @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5091657532 @default.
• W2322777763 creator A5091807397 @default.
• W2322777763 date "2016-04-01" @default.
• W2322777763 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2322777763 title "MP23-09 ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION FOR NON-SEMINOMATOUS TESTICULAR CANCER IN THE PRIMARY SETTING: A RETROSPECTIVE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS" @default.
• W2322777763 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.731" @default.
• W2322777763 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2322777763 type Work @default.
• W2322777763 sameAs 2322777763 @default.
• W2322777763 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2322777763 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5000639306 @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5004285397 @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5031102533 @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5032869458 @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5069174478 @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5077520250 @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5091657532 @default.
• W2322777763 hasAuthorship W2322777763A5091807397 @default.
• W2322777763 hasBestOaLocation W23227777631 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C2776212926 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C2776694085 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C2779511695 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C126322002 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C141071460 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C167135981 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C2775862295 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C2776212926 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C2776694085 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C2779511695 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C2780849966 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C61434518 @default.
• W2322777763 hasConceptScore W2322777763C71924100 @default.
• W2322777763 hasIssue "4S" @default.
• W2322777763 hasLocation W23227777631 @default.
• W2322777763 hasOpenAccess W2322777763 @default.
• W2322777763 hasPrimaryLocation W23227777631 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W1968716231 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W1972966692 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W2036200051 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W2060631358 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W2158826408 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W2401215387 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W2409926368 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W2412192487 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W3015176815 @default.
• W2322777763 hasRelatedWork W4251414785 @default.
• W2322777763 hasVolume "195" @default.
• W2322777763 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2322777763 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2322777763 magId "2322777763" @default.
• W2322777763 workType "article" @default.