FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2324203915> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2324203915 endingPage "491e" @default.
• W2324203915 startingPage "490e" @default.
• W2324203915 abstract "Sir:FigureWe read with great interest the article by Sanniec et al. entitled “Adherence to Photographic Standards: A Review of Plastic Surgeon Websites,”1 and we agree with the authors that photographs are essential in a plastic surgeon's practice. Although several articles have been published on this subject, medical publications/presentations and Web sites continue to appear that fail to satisfy clinical photography standards.2 These images are valuable for various purposes, including the following: creating models for preoperative planning, providing visual references during surgery, assessing surgical outcome, sharing data and experience with colleagues, communicating with patients to clarify their treatment plan, educating residents, and preparing presentations and publications. Moreover, photographs should be an integral part of the patient clinical record, in addition to informed consent, because they could represent one of the few elements of a physician's defense in medicolegal issues. In fact, today, most plastic surgeons, at some point in their career, have to address a complaint filed by a patient about their clinical performance, which may be followed by litigation. Because of the increasing importance of photographs, standardization according to well-established criteria is necessary to obtain significant and comparable images to be used in lawsuits. Very small variations can cause notable changes and may decrease markedly the value of clinical photography.3 Maintenance of constant camera settings, lighting, accurate positioning of subjects, no post–image acquisition changes using computer software, and use of identical views and patient preparation will significantly increase standardization.4 On this topic, in 2007, our group published an article in the journal Aesthetic Plastic Surgery entitled “Digital Photography in Plastic Surgery: How to Achieve Reasonable Standardization Outside a Photographic Studio.”5 In this article, on the basis of the medical literature and our own experience, we reported general criteria concerning patient preparation and camera setting and specific criteria for accurate image capture within different anatomical areas. The aim of our letter is to emphasize the importance of digital photography for plastic surgeons during medicolegal litigation; emphasize that plastic surgeons should use standardized photographic criteria; and raise awareness about some criteria, published in 2007 by our group, that we currently use in clinical practice. Use of strict digital photography guidelines that control all image characteristics will significantly enhance the potential of these images to objectively illustrate the plastic surgeon's work. Achille Aveta, M.D. Angela Filoni, M.D. Paolo Persichetti, M.D., Ph.D. Plastic Surgery Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this communication." @default.
• W2324203915 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2324203915 creator A5003369850 @default.
• W2324203915 creator A5019702890 @default.
• W2324203915 creator A5047139739 @default.
• W2324203915 date "2012-09-01" @default.
• W2324203915 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2324203915 title "Digital Photography in Plastic Surgery" @default.
• W2324203915 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e31825dc515" @default.
• W2324203915 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22929285" @default.
• W2324203915 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2324203915 type Work @default.
• W2324203915 sameAs 2324203915 @default.
• W2324203915 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152015 @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152016 @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152017 @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152018 @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152019 @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152020 @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152022 @default.
• W2324203915 countsByYear W23242039152023 @default.
• W2324203915 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2324203915 hasAuthorship W2324203915A5003369850 @default.
• W2324203915 hasAuthorship W2324203915A5019702890 @default.
• W2324203915 hasAuthorship W2324203915A5047139739 @default.
• W2324203915 hasBestOaLocation W23242039151 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C119657128 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C137762411 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C188087704 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C2776505523 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C2780838233 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C28719098 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C111919701 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C119657128 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C136764020 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C137762411 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C141071460 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C142362112 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C153349607 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C166957645 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C17744445 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C188087704 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C19527891 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C199539241 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C2524010 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C2776505523 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C2777855551 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C2780838233 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C28719098 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C33923547 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C41008148 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C509550671 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C71924100 @default.
• W2324203915 hasConceptScore W2324203915C95457728 @default.
• W2324203915 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2324203915 hasLocation W23242039151 @default.
• W2324203915 hasLocation W23242039152 @default.
• W2324203915 hasOpenAccess W2324203915 @default.
• W2324203915 hasPrimaryLocation W23242039151 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W1540871478 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W1596393722 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W1885497808 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W2022249118 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W2046737675 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W2072761933 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W2378767206 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W3009921285 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W328308450 @default.
• W2324203915 hasRelatedWork W51147162 @default.
• W2324203915 hasVolume "130" @default.
• W2324203915 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2324203915 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2324203915 magId "2324203915" @default.
• W2324203915 workType "article" @default.