FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2324244302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2324244302 abstract "Introduction This research explores young people's uses and perceptions of social media and mobile technologies as a form of surveillance enabling technologies ; i.e. technologies that were not originally designed for surveillance but can be used for these ends. It investigates the place of these technologies within young people’s interpersonal relationships, as well as the social impacts of the increased capacities for checking', 'looking up' and 'searching', that these technologies provide, potentially leading to a normalisation of such practices. This paper will give an overview of my first empirical findings as well as focus on theoretical insights within current debates on Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), power, and personal relationships. The project adopts a nuanced approach to surveillance by looking at social media and digital technologies, neither through the framework of empowerment and participation (Albrechtslund, 2008), nor solely through the framework of control and threat (e.g. social control, commercial and state surveillance). Both approaches overlook the duality between agency and wider social structures at play within these technologies. My research focuses on these technologies a means of social sorting and of normalisation of surveillance practices embedded in wider neo-liberal dynamics (e.g. assimilation of work and play (Sennett, 1998, Wittel, 2001), processes of self-responsibility and individualisation). It has been argued that these dynamics lead to more commodified forms of interpersonal relationships (Sennett, 1998, Wittel, 2001, Andrejevic 2007). My research, therefore, investigates surveillance practices in interpersonal relationships but also importantly looks at the shifting perceptions, discourses and legitimacy of these practices in everyday life (Andrejevic, 2007, Jansson, 2012). According to Andrejevic (2007), continuous and normalised interactions with surveillance processes and technologies make possible the emergence of a 'culture of peer-to-peer monitoring that mimics and amplifies top–down forms of commercial and political surveillance’ (Ibid. : 213). This culture, according to him, is deeply embedded within a broader neo-liberal governance in everyday life where relationships have become managed, optimised, and risks have been reduced. A peer to peer monitoring culture is said to have emerged as a response to increasing uncertainties and perceived risks and a need to pro-actively anticipate them. Thus 'the perceived need for verification increases' (Ibid.), alongside a responsibility of not 'being duped', which helps create a culture of suspicion. These dynamics are arguably not new but they are said to be exacerbated and facilitated by the proliferation of technologies of surveillance and verification, as well of uncertainties and wider political and commercial structures of power that seep into everyday life. Thus this research focuses on surveillance as a socially constructed phenomenon that is embedded in young people's lives through these technologies, as well as a reflection of wider political and commercial structures of power that seep into everyday life. David Lyon (2001) argues that surveillance relates to the development of new kinds of solidarity, involving less trust or at least different kinds of trust (109ff). This research aims to explore whether or not digitally mediated practices involve less 'trust' in interpersonal relationships and what the new modalities of 'different kinds of trust' are. Indeed these technologies, that can be used as means of assessment and verification, can have an important impact on gaining and giving trust first in commercial and work settings (e.g. consumers' reviews on commercial websites, targeted advertising, collection of consumers' data, employers looking up future employees, etc.) as well as in permeating into interpersonal relationships. This has been coined as a 'surveillance creep' (Trottier, 2012), i.e. the spread of surveillance practices from one context to another, and as a consequence normalising these practices. Technologies that enable and enhance surveillance both shape and are shaped by social interactions. Van Dijck argues that sociality becomes technical due to technological capacities to manipulate and manage social connections through social media (2013: 12). However; to avoid the pitfall of techno-determinism, this research looks at how ICTs reinforce and shape social practices as much as how they are shaped by the wider social and economical context within which they have proliferated. Peer scrutiny is not a new phenomenon in interpersonal relationships, but within a specific social and political agenda alongside the widespread of these technologies, interpersonal relationships are said to become more and more commodified. A common argument is that mutual disclosure, and peer scrutiny (understood as a form of care and control) participate in an information exchange upon which social bonds are based (Wittel, 2001). However, this contributes to justifying such practices and rests upon the idea of 'one have nothing to hide', reinforcing surveillance, the pressing need of disclosure and justifications in different contexts. Moreover, these discourses have impacted on normalising surveillance practices as legitimate and even as a responsible conduct to adopt. This therefore reshapes interpersonal relations and social bonds by means of the introduction of and proliferation of acts such as cross checking and surveillance-like verification. This research aims to uncover whether such practices are embedded and routinised within young people's interpersonal relationships, and how they reshape social practices. The proliferation of social media and mobile technologies coincides with the extension and individualisation of young people’s transitions to adulthood (Furlong & Cartmel, 1997), and is embedded within wider social and economical dynamics (e.g. expansion of education, mix of work and study, increasing flexibility in the labour market, desynchronisation of young people's schedules (Woodman, 2012, 2013)), as well as particularities of age, class, nationality and gender. The research uses semi-structured interviews with young people aged 16-25 to examine how these technologies, through social media platforms such as Instagram, Twitter and Facebook, and mobile devices, are used as a resource or obstacle to develop and maintain interpersonal relationships (e.g. with school peers, work colleagues, flatmates, friends), as well as their contributions to particular forms of socialising in young people's everyday lives. References Albrechtslund, A., Online social networking as a practice based on participatory surveillance, in First Monday, 2008, 13(3) Andrejevic, M., iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2007. Andrejevic, M., The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. in Surveillance & Society, 2005, 2(4), 479-497. Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage Publications, 1992. Bourdieu, P. Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1998. Bourdieu, P. The logic of practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 1990. Fuchs, C. Web 2.0, Prosumption, and Surveillance in Surveillance & Society, 2011, 8(3): 288-309. Furlong, A. and Cartmel, F. Young People and Social Change: Individualisation and Risk in the Age of High Modernity, Open University Press, Buckingham, 2007 [1997]. Jansson, A. Perceptions of surveillance: Reflexivity and trust in a mediatized world in European Journal of Communication , 2012, 27(4) 410–427 Lyon, D. and D. Trottier, Key Features of Social media Surveillance in Fuchs, Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media, Routledge, 2011. Sennett, R., The Corrosion of Character, The Personal Consequences Of Work In the New Capitalism, Norton, London, 1998. Trottier, D., Social Media as Surveillance, Rethinking Visibility in a Converging World, Ashgate, Surrey, 2012. van Dijck, J., The Culture of Connectivity A Critical History of Social Media, Oxford University Press, 2013. Wittel, A., Toward a Network Sociality in Theory, Culture & Society, 2001, 18 (6), 51-76 Woodman, D. Life out of Synch: How New Patterns of Further Education and the Rise of Precarious Employment Are Reshaping Young People’s Relationships in Sociology, 2012 vol. 63, issue 4. Woodman, D., 'Young people’s friendships in the context of non-standard work patterns', in Economic and Labour Relations Review, Centre for Applied Economic Research, 2013, vol. 24, issue 3." @default.
• W2324244302 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2324244302 creator A5091440209 @default.
• W2324244302 date "2015-07-01" @default.
• W2324244302 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2324244302 title "Surveillance Enabling Technologies and Peer Scrutiny: Impacts on Young People's Interpersonal Relationships" @default.
• W2324244302 cites W1487019888 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W1560629497 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W1895063068 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W1959725665 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W1994743485 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W1999073188 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W2035974400 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W2062199894 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W2162551201 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W2169942406 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W84792642 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W163263659 @default.
• W2324244302 cites W2582779683 @default.
• W2324244302 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/isis-summit-vienna-2015-s3037" @default.
• W2324244302 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2324244302 type Work @default.
• W2324244302 sameAs 2324244302 @default.
• W2324244302 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2324244302 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2324244302 hasAuthorship W2324244302A5091440209 @default.
• W2324244302 hasBestOaLocation W23242443021 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C164850336 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C534932454 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C108827166 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C136764020 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C15744967 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C164850336 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C17744445 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C199539241 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C2776050585 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C41008148 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C534932454 @default.
• W2324244302 hasConceptScore W2324244302C77805123 @default.
• W2324244302 hasLocation W23242443021 @default.
• W2324244302 hasOpenAccess W2324244302 @default.
• W2324244302 hasPrimaryLocation W23242443021 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W1595983809 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W1979651879 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2002490650 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2067938758 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2138441205 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2322032246 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2324244302 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2361983247 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2362573687 @default.
• W2324244302 hasRelatedWork W2409386434 @default.
• W2324244302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2324244302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2324244302 magId "2324244302" @default.
• W2324244302 workType "article" @default.